Apache Licence

2001-05-22 Thread Jasper Potts
What do I need to do to release a program and its source under an Apache Licence? How do I recommend a project to Apache? Many Thanks Jasper Potts - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Apache Licence

2001-05-22 Thread dhl patel
From: Jasper Potts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apache Licence Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:42:59 +0100 What do I need to do to release a program and its source under an Apache Licence? How do I recommend a project to Apache? Many Thanks Jasper

RE: Apache Licence

2001-05-22 Thread Jasper Potts
The email you sent as a reply was empty other than a quote? Thanks Jasper __ From: Jasper Potts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apache Licence Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:42:59 +0100 What

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Turbine

2001-05-22 Thread Sam Ruby
Jason van Zyl wrote: What is going on here? I fixed this code almost two days ago. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-05-21/cvs_index.html http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-05-22/cvs_index.html Compare this to the good old days:

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Turbine

2001-05-22 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Tim Vernum wrote: In general, I believe that automated build/test processes are *very* important, an do work. We've got some teams using CruiseControl here, and it is doing well. The reasons I think that gump registers so many failures are: 1) The environment in which gump runs is not

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Turbine

2001-05-22 Thread Sam Ruby
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: There is nothing (other than the sloth of Daedalus) which prevents us from adding any 'test' we want - Gump is running the Velocity testbed, for example, which is more than interface-related, but functional as well. That test suite takes 58 seconds to run. I think

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Turbine

2001-05-22 Thread Conor MacNeill
3) Developers can't/don't test other projects. This is particularly relevant to ant, but also to some of the XML and (soon) commons modules. A number of build failures have been due to changes in ant. Ant should continue to be free to change things as needed to make

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Turbine

2001-05-22 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Sam Ruby wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: There is nothing (other than the sloth of Daedalus) which prevents us from adding any 'test' we want - Gump is running the Velocity testbed, for example, which is more than interface-related, but functional as well. That test suite takes