Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

2001-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this didn't seem to go through yesterday It did :) -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:24:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lists that don't require subscriber

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

2001-09-06 Thread Peter Donald
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Things I also noticed: - cactus-user I don't know what this is all about... There is no archive, cactus is related to the commons project, so, it should be really a commons-user@jakarta... I think when it was initially voted on it was to be

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

2001-09-06 Thread Vincent Massol
- Original Message - From: Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:45 PM Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:44, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Things I also noticed: -

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

2001-09-06 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just sent a request for vote now on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... :) Since you're at it already, can you please also tell them that I'm going to change the mailing list name from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? :) Let me know... Pier

Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval

2001-09-06 Thread Jon Stevens
on 9/6/01 7:45 AM, Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S. Perhaps the right fix here is to create a jakarta-cactus subproject. Agreed... I would kindly ask to the Jakarta-Commons people, to vote on making Cactus become a top-level subproject of

Standardizing build.xml files

2001-09-06 Thread Berin Loritsch
I propose that we all use a standard target convention for all Ant based projects. This is something that helps adopters of GNU software all over. A person who has never seen GNOME or GCC knows they can compile it by running ./configure and make all check install. These conventions make it

Re: Standardizing build.xml files

2001-09-06 Thread Berin Loritsch
The Alexandria project with Gump, Maveric, et. al. are doing a great job of keeping all the builds working with each other. It also helps with notifying projects of changes in the API. But there hasn't been any official documentation or requests for target naming conventions like I just

Re: Standardizing build.xml files

2001-09-06 Thread Sam Ruby
Berin Loritsch wrote: Jon Stevens wrote: Please join the alexandria project's mailing lists. Gump, Maveric, JJAR, etc, are all trying to do this in one way or another. The Alexandria project with Gump, Maveric, et. al. are doing a great job of keeping all the builds working with each