Hi,
I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be another
Jakarta (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that
Jakata is always considered a bad example).
On the opposite. The Velocity TLP is intended to help reducing the
number of projects that Jakarta has. Which
On 9/23/06, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be another
Jakarta (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that
Jakata is always considered a bad example).
On the opposite. The Velocity TLP is intended to
Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 9/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there was no
stated deadline.
Aw, c'mon. It's been in discussion on velocity-dev for over a month,
and i gave the vote a full week!
Not complaining,
Adding velocity-dev
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
I'm completely with Nathan here. A Velocity TLP will not be another
Jakarta (though I do fail to see why everyone seems to believe that
Jakata is always considered a bad example).
Right - the only thing that was bad about Jakarta is
Hi,
I responded on velocity-dev, not general. Should we take the rest of
this discussion to velocity-dev so it's appropriate archived and no
one is left out?
best,
WILL
-- Forwarded message --
From: Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 23, 2006 3:22 PM
Subject: Re:
