Cool :)
Attached is some documentation on what all the scripts do, and
step by step instructions for installing the whole system on a new CVS
repository.
--Jeff
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 2/4/01 12:03 AM, "Jeff Turner" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd l
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 07:48:05PM -0700, Tal Dayan wrote:
For all the Microsoft lovers (and not so lovers) in this list. Take a look
at http://tal.ontero.net/home/Mocrosoft. This is a 1:15min mpeg file showing
Steve Balmar shouting, dancing and getting the Microsoft crowd excited.
Is this
that suggests there should be a fourth entry like
Package-stability: alpha | beta | release
so you could a) see this info, and b) decide what version should be used
based on stability.
d.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November
Howdy,
I've written up a Java utility, called DoctypeChanger, that I hope could
be useful to many people who exchange XML documents. I've mentioned it
on jakarta-commons and briefly on general@xml, but I thought I should
introduce it properly:
Probably the first XML interoperability issue that
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:58:06PM -0800, Dave Jarvis wrote:
Hello, again.
Neeme Praks wrote:
Have you ever had a look at Apache Cocoon project? That achieves all the
Yes.
benefits you outlined in your paper plus more.
Here are a few items BOX addresses that Cocoon does not (as
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 03:44:50PM -0500, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Guys,
This whole experience has become a bit disheartening. Craig McClanahan
who is like an idol of mine said this:
We will continue to do what we've done in the past -- reject projects
that only want the name
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 03:44:50PM -0500, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Guys,
This whole experience has become a bit disheartening. Craig McClanahan
who is like an idol of mine said this:
We will continue to do what we've done in the past -- reject projects
that only want the name
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:59:51PM -0800, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 1/7/02 5:10 PM, Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see you crying a lot over this but no POSITIVE initiative.
That is because I don't see a way to fix the problems and I'm not sure I
have the energy to actually go
This idea was (is) part of the Commons charter:
(1.5.2) the directory
The subproject will also catalog packages and other resources
available to the public related to other Jakarta subprojects and ASF
projects. This will be a dynamic catalog, like Bugzilla and Jyve,
similar in
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:29:18PM +1100, Peter Donald wrote:
...
To drive this point home, the subject line of this thread identifies
exactly one such set of duplication - between Turbine and Struts. My
nagging lead Berin to propose moving the Avalon collections code into
commons, to
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:48:42AM -, Danny Angus wrote:
Jon wrote:
My opinion is that there are to many peers in the process and that is what
is breaking Jakarta. This wasn't a problem until now. We are starting to
explode under our own ever growing weight.
I've been involved in
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:53:08AM -0800, Joe Labbe wrote:
Hello Everyone -
I am working on a project porting one of the oldest dynamic content
servers to the Java platform. The WebDish Presentation Server was
originally released in 93, and in 95 was named as the platform of
choice by
Hi,
Is there a page somewhere at apache.org, explaining why anyone would want to
switch from GPL to ASL? The GNU.org site paints a very inspiring picture of a
world of Free Software. It would be nice if there was an Apache equivalent
somewhere explaining the Apache philosophy. This could be used
Hi,
As promised, I've written up an ASL vs. GPL page, for possible
inclusion on jakarta-site2. I've more tried to capture the spirit of the
thing from the Apache POV, than duplicate the detailed arguments in the
O'Reilly article referenced at the end.
Please vote on whether you think the
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:46:51AM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
Hi,
As promised, I've written up an ASL vs. GPL page, for possible
inclusion on jakarta-site2.
...
Please vote on whether you think the reasons outlined here are
sufficiently representative. Constructive criticism and change
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:38:42PM +0100, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Jeff,
Kudos for having the courage to proceed with this. Comments inline.
:) It's not easy or fun.
At 08:46 07.03.2002 +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
...
Why prefer the ASL to a copyleft license (eg GPL
-flavoured introduction to the debate, by introducing the main
issue (GPL virality) and showing how that conflicted with Apache's
community-orientedness. And then link to the real thing.
I kinda think the link off of the Apache Manual was fine...
+1
--Jeff
-Andy
On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 16:46, Jeff
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:03:21PM +, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Paul Hammant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Enterprise Object Broker (EOB) is an application server that tries to a
be a simpler EJB container. It is not complete yet, but we have many
demos showing local, remote, and
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:00:11PM +0100, Santiago Gala wrote:
...
Then could we perhaps have a news@jakarta list for this sort of thing? A
lot of people find announcements like this relevant and interesting.
On a related (technological) note:
We Jetspeed people (actually Raphael Lutta)
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 12:10:13PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded Krysalis and Centipede, hoping to find some easy way of
building docs, but I was sorely disappointed. You have to know a ton of
stuff about Cocoon, Cocoon's 'book' format (which isn't DocBook), and the
other
Answered offlist. In the meanwhile, everyone pay homage to the
jakarta-site2 docs:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site2.html
and acknowledge that anything less ain't good enough for everyday
Jakarta use.
The DVSL-based system that Jason van Zyl mentioned sounds best:
Yup, that's my
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:23:35PM -0800, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 3/27/02 2:26 PM, Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All this and more is being tackled (slowly but steadily) in Forrest -
and having some Jakarta people involved for cross-pollination would be
good.
There's not
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:54:48AM +0100, Alex McLintock wrote:
At 09:02 13/05/2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I would like to encourage information about commercial entities that
support
Apache software, but I really have no clue about how it should be done.
I too am setting up an
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:04:20PM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
..
Perhaps we should just adopt a simple subject line convention, [ADV] for
adverts, to go with [ANN] for announcements.
I've noticed too that the annoumcement list stuff gets CCd to other lists.
How about having all
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:20:24PM +0100, Alex McLintock wrote:
At 13:13 13/05/2002, Jeff Turner wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:54:48AM +0100, Alex McLintock wrote:
At 09:02 13/05/2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I would like to encourage information about commercial entities
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 02:04:24PM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
If you are a commiter - you have the same rights with all other commiters.
If you don't want to exercise some rights - it's your choice.
Carnegie Mellon did a survey of ~300 Apache developers (56 committers) a
while ago, and posted interim results to respondents last month. With the
permission of the researcher, here are some stats:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:35:18PM +0100, Danny Angus wrote:
Vincent Massol once wrote:
I
and
performance.
From: Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 14:42:35 +1000
To: Frank Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TestMaker as subproject
Hi,
This looks very interesting. I'm trying to download the source to have a
play. I've downloaded CVS modules
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:46:25PM -, Rob Oxspring wrote:
As you can see the timetable has slipped a bit! However, there doesn't
seem to be a lot to go in this issue (just an entry for lucene +
whatever I write to summarise general@) and I was wondering whether it
was worth bothering
29 matches
Mail list logo
