Phil Steitz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It seems odd to me that code changes effectively require consensus,
but a release would not. What am I missing here?
All code in CVS is already there on consensus.
As are the bugs ;-)
Seriously, this seems like sort of a grey area between
Phil Steitz wrote:
Robert Leland wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It seems odd to me that code changes effectively require consensus,
but a release would not. What am I missing here?
All code in CVS is already there on consensus.
As are the bugs ;-)
Seriously
Can we really store non Apache licensed jars in the CVS ?
My personal preference is to store no jars in CVS
For Example I noticed ognl stored in Tapestry CVS :
//--
//Copyright (c) 2002, Drew Davidson and Luke Blanshard
Henri Yandell wrote:
(I need to get a real sleep schedule)
http://www.apache.org/~bayard/japache/ is a list of all Java projects at
Apache that I found.
Am just pondering ways in which to display all of them on one site, and
thought I'd share.
This is good. Since there is no single right way
-1
My knee jerk reaction to Proactively encourage TLP status is the same
as I had to one of my conservative friend who set out to
convert a family of another religion to their true religion. That is
repugnant to me, and so is Proactively encourage TLP status
If you want to make the information
