Re: More fun with unused/duplicate/unnecessary import statements

2002-11-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Tom Copeland wrote: Done: http://cvs.apache.org/~tcopeland/bad_imports_20_nov_02.htm How about adding xml-* projects into the list? Vadim Tom -Original Message- From: Lavandowska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:26 PM To: Jakarta General List

Re: I win!

2002-12-03 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Yes, I win! http://cvs.apache.org/~rubys/committers.html Ok, that page makes me laugh. =) While in good mood, may be you could apply http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467 ? Vadim -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I win!

2002-12-03 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/3 12:20 PM, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Done. Attached to the bug report: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=4029 Done. As an added bonus, I updated the build system to use more current standards. ant

Re: [POLL] OS of choice

2002-12-17 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
for any I see]. Ok, here it is: * MS Windows XP - Vadim Gritsenko (came with company's notebook) * Linux - Vadim Gritsenko (desktop) Vadim Hen On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: I added a simple poll for Jakarta developers. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/os.html Please

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Logging Services project

2003-12-18 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Ceki Gülcü wrote: Good morning to all, The log4j developers are pleased to announce that the Board of Directors of the Apache Software Foundation unanimously passed a resolution for the creation of the Apache Logging Services project. A copy of the resolution can be found at:

Re: Differences

2004-01-18 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Ted Husted wrote: Perhaps once most of the Committers are on the PMC list, we can move the administrative nonsense there again, and let the General list be the General list again :) Looking forward to it. Do not remember when good flame worth reading last happened on this list. Vadim

Re: Differences

2004-01-22 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: The last really good (by some people's definition, I guess) flame war happened a couple of years ago ... and caused the subscription count on this list to drop from 4000 to 1500 in less than a month. I wonder what that was? :-) It is currently 718. Hope it will

Re: Slide 2.0 release: How to roll out the distributions

2004-01-22 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Hi again! The Slide community is just about to make a first beta release for a 2.0 version. As I have never done any releases on Apache Jakarta what is the normal distribution process? What are the steps taken once the Slide committers have decided the release

Re: news symlinks

2004-03-02 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Marcus Sundman wrote: Would it be possible to have symlinks like http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/news-latest.html http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/elsewhere-latest.html that would point to the latest news? we'd then risk people losing long term urls. probably getting apache to do

Re: [VOTE] HiveMind as a Jakarta sub-project

2004-03-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: [ ] +1 I support this proposal [ ] -1 I don't support this proposal [X] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal Comments : I'm not up-to-date on HiveMind :-) Vadim - To unsubscribe,

Re: [site] Sister Resources

2004-03-23 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Resources (Unofficial) gets my vote, works for me. Ditto Vadim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: Updating the PMC bylaws

2004-08-06 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: ... However, the aim for this modification is to bring it in line with reality and not future plans and we've never had a PMC member who was not a committer. Every (loose) description I've seen of a PMC describes it as the active committers to a project. Yup. So I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-11 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: Suggested new bylaws are at: http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html [X] +1 - let's do it [ ] -1 - not good Vadim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: CVS-SVN Was: SVN of ECS

2004-09-28 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: My suggestion would be: jakarta/tomcat/tomcat-5 jakarta/tomcat/connectors jakarta/tomcat/servletapi ie) we'd delineate on definite subproject lines, rather than having projects with multiple directories in the jakarta-root. I'm not against servletapi (or any) being their own

Re: Can I use Hibernate in an Apache project without compromising the Apache License?

2004-09-29 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 11:11, Brett Porter wrote: is not ASF License compliant? If yes, than I would really hate to have to point you at

Re: Can I use Hibernate in an Apache project without compromising the Apache License?

2004-09-29 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin van den Bemt wrote: On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 13:56, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 11:11, Brett Porter wrote: is not ASF License compliant? If yes, than I would really hate to have to point you at http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven-plugins

Re: Can I use Hibernate in an Apache project without compromising the Apache License?

2004-09-29 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Sep 29, 2004, at 4:56 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: The problem, AFAIU, is that this Maven's code now has to become LGPL licensed itself, due to LGPL license requirements. And ASF repositories can't contain LGPL code. So the answer is to pull (quickly) this code

Re: Dormancy worries

2004-12-28 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: snip/ Then we can solicit volunteers from the PMC to be committers for each project to ensure that each has at least three. Volunteering means you agree to review and adddress patches and bug reports, vote on releases, etc., but

Re: Download counts?

2005-02-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Howard Lewis Ship wrote: That seems low; how did you come up with that number? Some regexps over httpd logs. See http://www.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/index.html Vadim On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:37:49 -0500, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howard Lewis Ship wrote: I'm continually asked

Re: Download counts?

2005-02-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: So low can be very good, as it means people are using the mirrors. Ever looked into getting logs from the mirrors Vadim? No; I believe it will be hard to impossible to do, as those mirrors are independent entities and might not want anybody messing with theirs log files. As

Re: VOTE: Tomcat - TLP

2005-04-06 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Ian F. Darwin wrote: The question: I vote in support of the proposal to move Tomcat to an Apache Top Level Project as detailed in the attached Resolution. [ X ] +1 Vote in support Vadim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[VOTE] Release Regexp 1.4

2005-08-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Hi All, With several recent bugfixes [1,2], and with previous release published almost two years ago [3], I think it is a good time to make a next, 1.4 release of the Jakarta Regexp. Please try out current svn (r232390) version [4] and test for any regressions, and vote for a release. My

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Regexp 1.4

2005-08-16 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please try out current svn (r232390) version [4] and test for any regressions, and vote for a release. Vote passes with 4 +1s [1], I'm cutting the release. Vadim [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11238848995r=1

[ANN] Jakarta Regexp 1.4 released

2005-08-17 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
The Jakarta Regexp team announces availability of the Jakarta Regexp 1.4 release. This is a maintenance release containing several (eleven, to be presice) bug fixes accumulated since the 1.3 release almost 2 years ago. Complete list of changes is available at the website:

Re: [ANN] Jakarta Regexp 1.4 released

2005-08-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
David J. M. Karlsen wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: The Jakarta Regexp team announces availability of the Jakarta Regexp 1.4 release. Are there any plans for consolidating ORO and Regexp ? I had none. Unless you want to do it. Vadim

Re: Fw: Subscribing a new Project into Jakarta

2005-10-13 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote: jakarta's been self consciously shrinking over the last few years (it's just too big and too complex) with a lot of old sub-projects graduating to lop level status. it's more difficult now to persuade people that new

Re: Fw: Subscribing a new Project into Jakarta

2005-10-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Felipe Leme wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: projects, but still, i must ask this to the FtpServer developers (i don´t know who they are). Hmm, there is a Maven-generated link that says Who We Are :-) I didn´t find this information on the site. Here is the link I mentioned:

Re: [VOTE] Jakarta Http Components

2005-10-22 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: So, period of comments now over, let's go ahead and vote on the creation of a Jakarta Subproject named Http Components with the following initial charter: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-httpclient/NewProjectCharter [ ] +1 [ ] -1 +1 Vadim

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin van den Bemt wrote: The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) : - Leave it as is - Move them to emuritus Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can discuss means and mechanisms of moving to emeritus and back, but

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-13 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin van den Bemt wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Martin van den Bemt wrote: The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) : - Leave it as is - Move them to emuritus Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can discuss means

Re: Representing project inactivity on the site

2006-03-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: * ECS, ORO, Regexp to be moved to a label of Inactive. Think of Regexp as of low maintenance project. There are several issues reported against it, and some of those can be (relatively) easy fixed and new release can be pushed out. It would be disappointing if such

Re: PROPOSAL: commons-ssl

2006-12-01 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Julius Davies wrote: ... I had to explain that Commons-SSL just sits on top of the JSSE and JCE to try and make working with SSL and Java easier. Your point about the name is a good one. The counterpoint to name argument. Just single example, I'm sure there are many more: commons-logging

Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of JakartaBoardReport-current by HenriYandell

2007-02-13 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Apache Wiki wrote: + * Inactive - No activity, no one watching it. Candidate for dormancy. + * Maintenance - No activity, someone watching it. Henri, Regexp + See ORO. + According to your definition, Regexp should be in Maintenance state. Vadim

[VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-13 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Hi All, With 5 recent bug fixes [1], one *major* speed improvement for {m,n} closures [2], with other various optimizations to compiler and runtime, and with previous release published sometime back in 2005 [3], now is the best, or at the very least, really good time to to cut next, 1.5

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
sebb wrote: The LICENSE and NOTICE files are now in the zip and jar, but they show up for me as License and Notice. Ideally they should be in capitals. They are: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/public_html/regexp $ tar -tzf jakarta-regexp-1.5-dev.tar.gz | grep dev/[^dsx] jakarta-regexp-1.5-dev/LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
sebb wrote: Also I think I need to update headers as per [3], is that correct? You also need a NOTICE file [3] Updated license headers, added NOTICE to zip/tar.gz. The LICENSE and NOTICE files ought to go into the jar as well, as the jar may well be used on its own. Added both files to

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-18 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
The vote to release passes with +1s from: Vadim Gritsenko Henning Schmiedehausen Daniel F. Savarese sebb Henri Yandell wrote: There are (to my knowledge) three types of vote/release styles that have been happening at the ASF. 1) A vote to do a release, with no sign of release files

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-18 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: snip/ PS I noticed that you forgot to vote this year :-) http://marc.info/?l=jakarta-generalm=11231425543 Vadim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-18 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: 3) Creating the actual files that are going to be released and voting on them. There's pressure to go this way, but it's not the policy yet. Vote has passed, so now actual files are made, and are available at the same location [1]. Vadim [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
opinion. Best regards Henning Vadim Gritsenko schrieb: Henri Yandell wrote: 3) Creating the actual files that are going to be released and voting on them. There's pressure to go this way, but it's not the policy yet. Vote has passed, so now actual files are made, and are available

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
sebb wrote: On 19/03/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: resulting files. It's quick sine no actual software testing need to be performed, just verify that zip unzips and tar untars. I think one also needs to check that: * that the various signature files are present and correct

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
sebb wrote: Surely voting on creating a tag (if this is necessary) Absolutely. Any release tag must be a community decision == vote is required. is completely different from voting on a release? Not to me. Voting on a release (on a tag) signifies that software is in a state where it can

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Jesse Kuhnert wrote: Ehh...Obviously I'm alone in my opinion so I'll shut up now, just wanted to make sure I got my two cents in. Make that two of us. ASF today indeed contains much more Administratium (thanks Dave, great link!) than it used to. Vadim

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin Cooper wrote: Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection. Who says there is no way to combine legal protection and non-absurd procedures? For example: community votes for a release, RM tags a release (and prepares files), pmc rubber-stamps it with 'ACK'

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection. Who says there is no way to combine legal protection and non-absurd procedures? Not me. We don't have absurd procedures, so

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: On 3/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: Those sites provide infrastructure, but absolutely no legal protection. Who says there is no way to combine legal

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-20 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Niall Pemberton wrote: On 3/14/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: Also I think I need to update headers as per [3], is that correct? You also need a NOTICE file [3] Updated license headers, added NOTICE to zip/tar.gz. The NOTICE file is missing the copyright

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-20 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: This 'how we release' conversation has been bouncing around the ASF for 4 months now, the above is my best grok on the summary. I've not seen anyone yet speaking in favour of a view that we should have a vote on the idea of releasing and then someone does it when they can.

Re: svn commit: r520239 - /jakarta/site/docs/site/news/news-2007-q1.html

2007-03-20 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
sebb wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=520239 Log: set eol-style Modified: jakarta/site/docs/site/news/news-2007-q1.html (contents, props changed) By the way, when changing the SVN eol-style to native, if possible, it is best to do this on a platform which has the

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Jakarta Regexp 1.5 released

2007-03-20 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
The Jakarta Regexp team announces availability of the Jakarta Regexp 1.5 release. This is a maintenance release containing several bug fixes as well as performance optimizations for several classes of expressions. Complete list of changes is available at the website:

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-24 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote: So the question is; is the above direction worth discussing, Not sure about moving to incubator part -- but overall -- yes, IMHO it is worth discussing. Vadim or should we just go with the Commons TLP. Hen

Re: [VOTE] - please! - Release JMeter 2.3 final

2007-09-27 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
sebb wrote: Thanks to those who voted so far. At least two more PMC votes are needed - please! S/// On 25/09/2007, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've created what I hope will be JMeter 2.3 final in the directory: http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/dist Site/Docs are here:

Re: [VOTE] Merge dev lists

2009-10-20 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Oct 19, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: [Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only] This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into one development and one notifications list. For background including timing, anticipated benefits and some

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic

2010-08-17 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Aug 15, 2010, at 12:16 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: This is a vote (or more correctly, three independent votes) to move Jakarta ECS, Jakarta ORO and Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. There is one unreleased bugfix on trunk

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic

2010-08-18 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: With RegEx in Java since 1.4, I do not see the need for these libs aside from legacy application support. I consider mothballing a service to the community at large: please, join us in the 21st century, port your RegEx code to Java 1.4. ;)

Re: Regexp (was: Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic)

2011-03-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Mar 12, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Ian Darwin i...@darwinsys.com wrote: Six months have passed and there hasn't been much activity. Should we revisit this now? Someone recently offered to contribute some code on regexp-user@, but it didn't

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic

2011-03-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
On Mar 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: Someone recently offered to contribute some code on regexp-user@, Daniel - Unless I miss something... regexp-user is dead though? Was replaced by general a good while ago. Vadim

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Jakarta Regexp to Attic

2011-03-22 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
+1 Vadim On Mar 21, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. Since Regexp may not have enough PMC members active, this vote will be held by lazy consensus. If you