Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-22 Thread Danny Angus
As we get more and more into auth, it becomes tempting to auth the whole thing. Vote through the webapp and not an email, You could sign your mail with a key you register for the purpose. listens to emails and a script that sends out emails in a particular format. Might work, but parsing

Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-22 Thread Roland Weber
Hi Danny, As we get more and more into auth, it becomes tempting to auth the whole thing. Vote through the webapp and not an email, You could sign your mail with a key you register for the purpose. that's a big hurdle for a guest voter. cheers, Roland

Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-22 Thread Danny Angus
Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/12/2006 09:21:51: Hi Danny, As we get more and more into auth, it becomes tempting to auth the whole thing. Vote through the webapp and not an email, You could sign your mail with a key you register for the purpose. that's a big hurdle

Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-22 Thread Roland Weber
Hi Danny, It would only be necessary for binding votes to be signed. No? That's a possibility. On the other hand, that could send a wrong signal to the non-binding voters: you don't have to sign your votes, they're not important anyway. I'd be very careful with such distinctions. cheers,

Jakarta Voting

2006-12-21 Thread David Fisher
Hi Jakarta Board- A suggestion after reading with interest the recent POI vs. Jakarta smoke and flames threads. I think that Jakarta needs a voting application that can include PMC quorum requirements, direct email vote requests, committer approval, etc. Maybe it already exists?

Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/20/06, David Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jakarta Board- A suggestion after reading with interest the recent POI vs. Jakarta smoke and flames threads. I think that Jakarta needs a voting application that can include PMC quorum requirements, direct email vote requests, committer

Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-21 Thread Will Glass-Husain
I don't know... a secure webapp for votes seems overkill for most situations. I like the informal nature of the voting on the lists. It encourages participation. People can vote with non-binding votes, which is a good thing, I think -- they get to express their opinion and influence the

Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-21 Thread Roland Weber
Hi Henri, [...] I was mostly thinking about it because I felt like writing something new rather than maintaining code): That's the best reason of all :-) * Simplifies calling a vote. * Adds a better audit trail. * Can know about the binding votes and it can decide whether a vote is