Pier,
I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says:
Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ...
I can't imagine something that could be worse than
this for the software business and the
intellectual-property business.
It takes a huge amount of effort to build
Hi Ceki!
Long mail follows.
Ceki Glc wrote:
Pier,
I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says:
Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ...
I can't imagine something that could be worse than
this for the software business and the
intellectual-property
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 08:35:43AM +1100, Green, Alan wrote:
Ceki Glc wrote:
I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says:
Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ...
I can't imagine something that could be worse than
this for the software business and the
Ceki Glc wrote:
I am not sure that Allaire is entirely insane. He says:
Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer ...
I can't imagine something that could be worse than
this for the software business and the
intellectual-property business.
Shouldn't this be attributed to
Hi guys!
This is what I think about Open Source being "unamerican"
First of all, let me tell you that I am not North American I am Venezuelan
(that's South Amarican) and my parents are Cuban, so let me tell you that
Open Source isn't comunism, Open Source IS Freedom, in the sense that you
"They were pursuing their own happiness without regard to revenue
generation or
market share.
What could be more American than that?"
hmm, doesn't sound American to me - sounds more like socialism.
Not that I agree or disagree with MS - but those lines are just wrong.
American == Capitalism ==
Message-
From: Doug Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 6:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is open source "unamerican"...
"They were pursuing their own happiness without regard to revenue
generation or
market share.
What could b
How Ironic, the very thing that Microsoft conveyed during anti trust trials,
which is "innovation" and government intervention would only stifle it,
apparently does not apply to us I guessed?
-Original Message-
From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February
