On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:44 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
...
How about adding a download-libraries target to the Ant build, that
downloads the dependencies from the central (Maven) repository?
That's a possibility for a
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:44 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
...
How about adding a download-libraries target to the Ant build, that
downloads the dependencies from the central (Maven) repository?
That's a
On 01/06/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:44 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
...
How about adding a download-libraries target to the Ant
sebb wrote:
On 01/06/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:44 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
...
How about adding a download-libraries target to the Ant build, that
You need the binary archive to build the binary archive? That makes no
sense to me. It should be possible to download only the sources and then
build the binary archives.
Remember, the source *is* the only form of release that we actually do.
The binaries are just an added bonus. This has
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:56 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/05/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/05/2008, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MD5, PGP good.
It's a bit odd that the binary version comes chock full of jars and
the source version doesn't.
On 31/05/2008, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:56 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/05/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/05/2008, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MD5, PGP good.
It's a bit odd that the binary version
On 31/05/2008, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need the binary archive to build the binary archive? That makes no sense
to me.
No, one just needs the libraries contained in the binary archive in
order to build the binaries.
This is to avoid unnecessary duplication - the
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2008, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need the binary archive to build the binary archive? That makes no sense
to me.
No, one just needs the libraries contained in the binary archive in
order to build the binaries.
This is to avoid unnecessary
On 31/05/2008, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2008, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need the binary archive to build the binary archive? That makes no
sense
to me.
No, one just needs the libraries contained in the binary
On 28/05/2008, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MD5, PGP good.
It's a bit odd that the binary version comes chock full of jars and
the source version doesn't. When I run 'ant' in the source version I
get:
BUILD FAILED
/Users/hen/apache/jmeter/jakarta-jmeter-2.3.2/build.xml:925:
On 30/05/2008, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/05/2008, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MD5, PGP good.
It's a bit odd that the binary version comes chock full of jars and
the source version doesn't. When I run 'ant' in the source version I
get:
BUILD FAILED
MD5, PGP good.
It's a bit odd that the binary version comes chock full of jars and
the source version doesn't. When I run 'ant' in the source version I
get:
BUILD FAILED
/Users/hen/apache/jmeter/jakarta-jmeter-2.3.2/build.xml:925:
/Users/hen/apache/jmeter/jakarta-jmeter-2.3.2/lib/opt not found.
13 matches
Mail list logo
