Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-16 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Late, but not too late... :-)

+1  Let's do it.

On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 17:58, Henri Yandell wrote:
 Suggested new bylaws are at:
 
 http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
 
 The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set
 of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
 sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
 (ie: active/inactive projects).
 
 Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
 
 ===
 [ ] +1 - let's do it
 [ ] -1 - not good
 ===
 
 I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we
 could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
 disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
 nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] Updating
 PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.
 
 Hen
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen  INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
 
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
 fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
 position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
 is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
 deserves to be on this list of the top five problems.
   --Michelle Levesque, Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-11 Thread jean-frederic clere
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
(ie: active/inactive projects).
Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
===
[ ] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===
I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we
could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] Updating
PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.
Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-11 Thread Danny Angus
+1

d.
Danny Angus







***
The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. 
If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to 
the intended recipient) please notify us immediately on 0141 306 2050 and delete the 
message from your computer. You may not copy or forward it or use or disclose its 
contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data 
corruption Student Loans Company Limited does not accept any  responsibility for 
changes made to this message after it was sent. For this reason it may be 
inappropriate to rely on advice or opinions contained in an e-mail without obtaining 
written confirmation of it. Neither Student Loans Company Limited or the sender 
accepts any liability or responsibility for viruses as it is your responsibility to 
scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of 
the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of The Student Loans Company 
Limited.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of 
computer viruses.

**


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-11 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
[X] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
Vadim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-11 Thread Larry Isaacs
===
[X] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===

Larry

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Avik Sengupta
+1

On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 21:28, Henri Yandell wrote:
 Suggested new bylaws are at:
 
 http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
 
...




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Minor tweak under Membership: I would switch the 2 paragraphs such
that the voting-new-members-in bit comes before the I'm outta here
bit. Makes the item more positive methinks.

Gary

 -Original Message-
 From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 08:59
 To: Jakarta General List
 Subject: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
 
 
 Suggested new bylaws are at:
 
 http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
 
 The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new
set
 of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
 sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
 (ie: active/inactive projects).
 
 Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
 
 ===
 [ ] +1 - let's do it
 [ ] -1 - not good
 ===
 
 I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others
we
 could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
 disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
 nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE]
Updating
 PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.
 
 Hen
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Hi,

Suggested new bylaws are at:

http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html

The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new
set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
(ie: active/inactive projects).

Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.

===
[ X ] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===

Yoav Shapira



This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Michael Becke
+1
Mike
Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
(ie: active/inactive projects).
Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
===
[ ] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===
I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we
could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] Updating
PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.
Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Mark Thomas
+1

Mark 

 -Original Message-
 From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:59 PM
 To: Jakarta General List
 Subject: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws
 
 
 Suggested new bylaws are at:
 
 http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
 
 The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan 
 out a new set
 of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
 sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
 (ie: active/inactive projects).
 
 Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
 majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
 
 ===
 [ ] +1 - let's do it
 [ ] -1 - not good
 ===
 
 I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there 
 are others we
 could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
 disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
 nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: 
 [VOTE] Updating
 PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.
 
 Hen
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
+1
On Aug 10, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new 
set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
(ie: active/inactive projects).

Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
===
[ ] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===
I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others 
we
could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] 
Updating
PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.

Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
+1
Oliver
Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
(ie: active/inactive projects).
Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
===
[ ] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===
I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we
could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] Updating
PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.
Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Adrian Sutton
+1
Adrian Sutton.
On 11/08/2004, at 1:58 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new 
set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
(ie: active/inactive projects).

Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
===
[ ] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===
I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others 
we
could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] 
Updating
PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.

Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Intencha tomorrow's technology today
Ph: 38478913 0422236329
Suite 8/29 Oatland Crescent
Holland Park West 4121
Australia QLD
www.intencha.com


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Phil Steitz
+1
Phil
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new 
set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping things from the text as they require discussion
(ie: active/inactive projects).

Voting rules are that we need at least 3 +1 _PMC votes_, and a 3/4
majority of +1's to -1's. I'll announce results next Tuesday.
===
[ ] +1 - let's do it
[ ] -1 - not good
===
I think the above voting rule is fair enough, though there are others we
could use. Let's not worry too much about it unless we have major
disagreements. Also, if people have non-voting commentary, it would be
nice if they could change the subject (ie:  Madness   Was: [VOTE] 
Updating
PMC bylaws). Makes counting the votes a lot easier.

Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [VOTE] Updating PMC bylaws

2004-08-10 Thread Bill Barker
 ===
 [X] +1 - let's do it
 [ ] -1 - not good
 ===
 


This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in 
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this 
message and any attachments.

In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the 
Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as 
social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and 
passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]