Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:40 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting Scott Bahling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build > > status > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 09:59 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > > > Hi Doug! > > > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > > > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > > > > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > > > > > > > Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in > > > > the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... > > > Some part of this thread might confuse. And really, it's not about > > > any specific backport issue from ehca or other component(s). It's a > > > general prereq for ofed's daily build to have rhel4.5 resp sles10 ppc64 > > > in their daily build runs too. > > > > I have checked, and Mellanox still has an active partner account with > > Novell which means they can download our product isos (which contain the > > kernel-source rpms) at http://download.novell.com and any package > > updates at support.novell.com http://support.novell.com/linux/psdb/ > > using proper Mellanox logins. You can contact me offline of you need > > help here. > > > > Also, our current cvs snapshots can be found at > > > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/ > > or the following mirror > > ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/projects/kernel/kotd/ > > > > These are unreleased bits, but give you a peek into what changes might > > be coming in the next kernel update. Not sure if this is of use to you. > > I don't have a ppc machine so I can't use your install ISOs. Nonsense. Of course you can. At a minimum rpm2cpio | cpio -ivd gets around the arch of the package regardless of what machine you are on and installs it without involving the rpm database. > If someone cares enough about SLES/RHEL on ppc support in OFED, > she can upload the unpacked kernel devel headers for these distros > to ofa server and we'll use these to cross-compile OFED kernel bits, > nightly. -- Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Scott Bahling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build > status > > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 09:59 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > > Hi Doug! > > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > > > > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > > > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > > > > > Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in > > > the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... > > Some part of this thread might confuse. And really, it's not about > > any specific backport issue from ehca or other component(s). It's a > > general prereq for ofed's daily build to have rhel4.5 resp sles10 ppc64 > > in their daily build runs too. > > I have checked, and Mellanox still has an active partner account with > Novell which means they can download our product isos (which contain the > kernel-source rpms) at http://download.novell.com and any package > updates at support.novell.com http://support.novell.com/linux/psdb/ > using proper Mellanox logins. You can contact me offline of you need > help here. > > Also, our current cvs snapshots can be found at > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/ > or the following mirror > ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/projects/kernel/kotd/ > > These are unreleased bits, but give you a peek into what changes might > be coming in the next kernel update. Not sure if this is of use to you. I don't have a ppc machine so I can't use your install ISOs. If someone cares enough about SLES/RHEL on ppc support in OFED, she can upload the unpacked kernel devel headers for these distros to ofa server and we'll use these to cross-compile OFED kernel bits, nightly. -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 09:59 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > Hi Doug! > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > > > Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in > > the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... > Some part of this thread might confuse. And really, it's not about > any specific backport issue from ehca or other component(s). It's a > general prereq for ofed's daily build to have rhel4.5 resp sles10 ppc64 > in their daily build runs too. I have checked, and Mellanox still has an active partner account with Novell which means they can download our product isos (which contain the kernel-source rpms) at http://download.novell.com and any package updates at support.novell.com http://support.novell.com/linux/psdb/ using proper Mellanox logins. You can contact me offline of you need help here. Also, our current cvs snapshots can be found at ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/ or the following mirror ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/projects/kernel/kotd/ These are unreleased bits, but give you a peek into what changes might be coming in the next kernel update. Not sure if this is of use to you. -Scott ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build > status > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 09:59 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > > Hi Doug! > > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > > > > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > > > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > > > > > Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in > > > the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... > > Some part of this thread might confuse. And really, it's not about > > any specific backport issue from ehca or other component(s). It's a > > general prereq for ofed's daily build to have rhel4.5 resp sles10 ppc64 > > in their daily build runs too. > > Thanks > > Nam > > All of the kernel rpms from our U5 kernel have been on my web page in my > sig for *ages*. All you need to do is download the needed rpms and > install. I think there's no way to unpack these without a ppc machine, though. Is that right? -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 09:59 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > Hi Doug! > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > > > Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in > > the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... > Some part of this thread might confuse. And really, it's not about > any specific backport issue from ehca or other component(s). It's a > general prereq for ofed's daily build to have rhel4.5 resp sles10 ppc64 > in their daily build runs too. > Thanks > Nam All of the kernel rpms from our U5 kernel have been on my web page in my sig for *ages*. All you need to do is download the needed rpms and install. -- Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Hi Doug! > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in > the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... Some part of this thread might confuse. And really, it's not about any specific backport issue from ehca or other component(s). It's a general prereq for ofed's daily build to have rhel4.5 resp sles10 ppc64 in their daily build runs too. Thanks Nam ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in > the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... Our cross build environment has the headers from the x86_64 version but not the ppc version. -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 16:08 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build > > status > > > > > > Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download > > > > above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed > > > > code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early > > > > stage. > > > > Thanks much in advance! > > > > > > Nam, > > >why can't you do this yourself? > > > > I may not upload code, for which I'm not a distributor, to the > > (public) ofa server. Please understand that. > > Oh? > GPL clearly gives you the right to distribute kernel code. I think IBM's attorneys have probably banned uploading code to public servers unless you are part of their IT department and uploading an officially blessed product. Technically, if Nam uploaded code to a public server, then IBM can be seen as a distributor of that code, and that's when certain parts of the GPL kick in and obligate the distributor to various things. I'm guessing the lawyers didn't want the company to be accidentally obligated to anything, and the only safe way to avoid that is not to allow developers to upload code. > > >I think that IBM's the one that needs this most of all. > > > > I think it's ofed group who should ask redhat and suse for help in this > > matter, because in the long run, this is about ofed development and build. > > Tziporet, please add this topic to today's ofed call. > > > -- Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 21:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? Don't you guys already have RHEL4U5? It had a backports directory in the OFED 1.2 release...and it's been out for quite a while... > > >This would make it possible for us to add it to nightly builds. > > Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download > > above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed > > code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early > > stage. > > Thanks much in advance! > > > > Regards > > Nam > > Nam, > why can't you do this yourself? > I think that IBM's the one that needs this most of all. > -- Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build > status > > > > Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download > > > above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed > > > code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early > > > stage. > > > Thanks much in advance! > > > > Nam, > >why can't you do this yourself? > > I may not upload code, for which I'm not a distributor, to the > (public) ofa server. Please understand that. Oh? GPL clearly gives you the right to distribute kernel code. > >I think that IBM's the one that needs this most of all. > > I think it's ofed group who should ask redhat and suse for help in this > matter, because in the long run, this is about ofed development and build. > Tziporet, please add this topic to today's ofed call. -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> > Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download > > above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed > > code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early > > stage. > > Thanks much in advance! > > Nam, >why can't you do this yourself? I may not upload code, for which I'm not a distributor, to the (public) ofa server. Please understand that. >I think that IBM's the one that needs this most of all. I think it's ofed group who should ask redhat and suse for help in this matter, because in the long run, this is about ofed development and build. Tziporet, please add this topic to today's ofed call. Nam ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > >This would make it possible for us to add it to nightly builds. > Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download > above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed > code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early > stage. > Thanks much in advance! > > Regards > Nam Nam, why can't you do this yourself? I think that IBM's the one that needs this most of all. -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:30 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > > Hello Doug and Scott! > > > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > > >This would make it possible for us to add it to nightly builds. > > Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download > > above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed > > code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early > > stage. > > Actually, with RHEL4 didn't we already establish that me uploading a > source tarball is definitely *not* the way to go? The kernel-devel rpm > on each arch only includes the files that it thinks are relevant to that > arch, and by compiling against a complete source tree, you missed the > fact that the ppc64 arch wouldn't compile against the kernel-devel.ppc64 > package entirely. This was never intended as a replacement for testing - this is just a tool to speed up backport development. But fine - upload the files from the kernel-devel rpm then. -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:30 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > Hello Doug and Scott! > > On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > >ehca in build for these kernels. > > > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? > >This would make it possible for us to add it to nightly builds. > Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download > above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed > code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early > stage. Actually, with RHEL4 didn't we already establish that me uploading a source tarball is definitely *not* the way to go? The kernel-devel rpm on each arch only includes the files that it thinks are relevant to that arch, and by compiling against a complete source tree, you missed the fact that the ppc64 arch wouldn't compile against the kernel-devel.ppc64 package entirely. -- Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status > > Hello Michael and Vladimir! > > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable > >ehca in build for these kernels. > I downloaded daily build package ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200.tgz > and followed the build scheme configure, make on 2.6.19, 2.6.18, 2.6.17 > and 2.6.16/sles10/sles10_sp1. Except for 2.6.16/sles10/sles10_sp1 > a patch for kmem_cache_zalloc() is required for ehca the others were > built without errors, see below. Thus, I'm wondering what I'm doing > differently than your daily build script? Could be different kernel configs or compiler version? Can you please build on ofa server against kernels in ~vlad/kernel.org/? The cross tool chain is here: /home/vlad/cross/ -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Hello Doug and Scott! On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable >ehca in build for these kernels. > > 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? >This would make it possible for us to add it to nightly builds. Could you please provide Michael and Vladimir with a URL to download above kernel source tree in order to perform daily build of ofed code suite? This will help us to prevent build issues in very early stage. Thanks much in advance! Regards Nam ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Hello Michael and Vladimir! > ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. > 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable >ehca in build for these kernels. I downloaded daily build package ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200.tgz and followed the build scheme configure, make on 2.6.19, 2.6.18, 2.6.17 and 2.6.16/sles10/sles10_sp1. Except for 2.6.16/sles10/sles10_sp1 a patch for kmem_cache_zalloc() is required for ehca the others were built without errors, see below. Thus, I'm wondering what I'm doing differently than your daily build script? PS: Will run the build on rhel5 (still to set up kernel tree). Thanks Nam * linux-2.6.19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200]# uname -r 2.6.19 gcc -m64 -Wp,-MD,/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/.ib_ipoib.mod.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/include -D__KERNEL__ \ -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.19/include/ \ -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/include \ -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/include \ -Iinclude \ \ -include include/linux/autoconf.h \ -include /root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/include/linux/autoconf.h \ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -O2 -msoft-float -pipe -mminimal-toc -mtraceback=none -mcall-aixdesc -mtune=power4 -mno-altivec -funit-at-a-time -mstring -Wa,-maltivec -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-stack-protector -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/include -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/include -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/debug -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/core -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/net/cxgb3 -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/net/rds -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/net/mlx4 -I/root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4 -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(ib_ipoib.mod)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(ib_ipoib)" -DMODULE -c -o /root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ib_ipoib.mod.o /root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ib_ipoib.mod.c ld -m elf64ppc -r -o /root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ib_ipoib.ko /root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ib_ipoib.o /root/2.6.19/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ib_ipoib.mod.o make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.19' [EMAIL PROTECTED] ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200]# find . -name '*.ko' ./drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ib_ipoib.ko ./drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ib_ehca.ko ./drivers/infiniband/core/ib_mad.ko ./drivers/infiniband/core/iw_cm.ko ./drivers/infiniband/core/ib_uverbs.ko ./drivers/infiniband/core/ib_ucm.ko ./drivers/infiniband/core/ib_cm.ko ./drivers/infiniband/core/ib_sa.ko ./drivers/infiniband/core/ib_core.ko * 2.6.18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.6.18]# uname -r 2.6.18 gcc -m64 -Wp,-MD,/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/.ib_ipoib.mod.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/include -D__KERNEL__ \ -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.18/include/ \ -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/include \ -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/include \ -Iinclude \ \ -include include/linux/autoconf.h \ -include /root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/include/linux/autoconf.h \ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -O2 -msoft-float -pipe -mminimal-toc -mtraceback=none -mcall-aixdesc -mtune=power4 -mno-altivec -funit-at-a-time -mstring -Wa,-maltivec -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-stack-protector -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/include -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/include -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/debug -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/core -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/net/cxgb3 -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/net/rds -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/net/mlx4 -I/root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070804-0200/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4 -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(ib_ipoib.mod)" -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(ib_ipoib)" -DMODULE -c -o /root/2.6.18/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-2
Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
If I clone from my local system over the net, I _get_ all the branches! Anybody know why local clones on the ofa build server are not pulling all the branches? Maybe I'm abusing git? It sounds like a different between git versions. Older git versions brought in remote branches such that 'git branch' would show them. (This causes problems if a remote branch conflicts with a local branch.) With the newer git version (what's on the ofa server), you need to use 'git branch -r' to see all of the actual branches. - Sean ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Sean Hefty wrote: Yea, that's it. But how do I checkout the remote branch? The man page and 'git help' don't even show the -r option... I think you use the full name. Example: git checkout origin/ofed_1_2 - Sean Yep, that did it! And if you want to make a local branch, you do git checkout -b origin/ofed_1_2 Thanks! Steve. ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Yea, that's it. But how do I checkout the remote branch? The man page and 'git help' don't even show the -r option... I think you use the full name. Example: git checkout origin/ofed_1_2 - Sean ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Sean Hefty wrote: If I clone from my local system over the net, I _get_ all the branches! Anybody know why local clones on the ofa build server are not pulling all the branches? Maybe I'm abusing git? It sounds like a different between git versions. Older git versions brought in remote branches such that 'git branch' would show them. (This causes problems if a remote branch conflicts with a local branch.) With the newer git version (what's on the ofqmanqa server), you need to use 'git branch -r' to see all of the actual branches. - Sean Yea, that's it. But how do I checkout the remote branch? The man page and 'git help' don't even show the -r option... Steve. ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
I've narrowed my problem down to this: I'm cloning vlad's ofabuild repos, but it only gets me the master branch. So if I clone via: git clone git://git.openfabrics.org/~vlad/ofabuild.git or git clone -s /home/vlad/scm/ofabuild.git My clone repos only has the master branch. There should be master, ofed_1_2, ofed_1_2_c, and origin. If I clone from my local system over the net, I _get_ all the branches! Anybody know why local clones on the ofa build server are not pulling all the branches? Maybe I'm abusing git? Thanks, Steve. Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Looke here: /home/vlad/scripts/ofed_1_2 Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Subject: Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status I'm havin' a bad day. Can you all help me? My normal process is to use the build_ofa_kernel.sh script from the ofabuild repository to build against all ofed kernels. But that scripts in the master branch of the ofabuild repository now assumes 1.2.c because it tries to configure in the connectx device. There aren't ofed_1_2 and ofed_1_2_c branches in that repos for tree-specific build scripts. S: What exactly should I be using to do cross-compile builds of my patched trees before submitting patches for inclusion into ofed? Thanks and sorry for the pain. And if there a RTFM somewhere that I should be readying, feel free to say RTFM. :) Steve. ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Looke here: /home/vlad/scripts/ofed_1_2 Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Subject: Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status I'm havin' a bad day. Can you all help me? My normal process is to use the build_ofa_kernel.sh script from the ofabuild repository to build against all ofed kernels. But that scripts in the master branch of the ofabuild repository now assumes 1.2.c because it tries to configure in the connectx device. There aren't ofed_1_2 and ofed_1_2_c branches in that repos for tree-specific build scripts. S: What exactly should I be using to do cross-compile builds of my patched trees before submitting patches for inclusion into ofed? Thanks and sorry for the pain. And if there a RTFM somewhere that I should be readying, feel free to say RTFM. :) Steve. -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
I'm havin' a bad day. Can you all help me? My normal process is to use the build_ofa_kernel.sh script from the ofabuild repository to build against all ofed kernels. But that scripts in the master branch of the ofabuild repository now assumes 1.2.c because it tries to configure in the connectx device. There aren't ofed_1_2 and ofed_1_2_c branches in that repos for tree-specific build scripts. S: What exactly should I be using to do cross-compile builds of my patched trees before submitting patches for inclusion into ofed? Thanks and sorry for the pain. And if there a RTFM somewhere that I should be readying, feel free to say RTFM. :) Steve. ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status Also, Is something broken in the ofed_1_2 branch? I cannot even build against the local kernel on the ofa server using the ~vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 repository. Does directory ~vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 exist? Turns out this is a pilot error. I'm using the 1.2.c build script apparently. So its trying to configure the connetx driver on the ofed_1_2 branch. also, vlad tells me to use /pub/scm/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 and not the one in his dir... (i'm battin' 0 today on builds :) steve. ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
> Quoting Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build > status > > Also, > > Is something broken in the ofed_1_2 branch? I cannot even build against > the local kernel on the ofa server using the ~vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 > repository. Does directory ~vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 exist? -- MST ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
Also, Is something broken in the ofed_1_2 branch? I cannot even build against the local kernel on the ofa server using the ~vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 repository. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/git/ofabuild$ env git_url=~vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 git_branch=ofed_1_2 CHECK_LOCAL=yes CHECK_KERNEL_ORG=no CHECK_CROSS=no ~swise/git/ofabuild/build_ofa_kernel.sh mkdir -p /home/swise/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0912 ~/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0912 ~/git/ofabuild git clone -s --bare --reference /home/vlad/scm/ofed_1_2 /home/vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 .git git checkout ofed_1_2 ofed_scripts/ofed_checkout.sh ofed_scripts/ofed_checkout.sh ofed_1_2 git update-ref HEAD ofed_1_2 Git: /home/vlad/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6 ofed_1_2 commit 020bfb400c759ba89ffb0b13c41f2ca50181aebe ~/git/ofabuild cp -a /home/swise/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0912 /home/swise/builds/ofa_1_2_c_kernel/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0912 rm -rf /home/swise/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0912 Build failed on i686 with 2.6.15-23-server ___ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status
ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable ehca in build for these kernels. 2. Could you upload kernels for RHEL4U5 and SLES10 ppc64? This would make it possible for us to add it to nightly builds. -- Failed: Build failed on powerpc with linux-2.6.18 Log: /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.18_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:831: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.18_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:834: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.18_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:835: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ make[4]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.18_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.18_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.18_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband] Error 2 make[1]: *** [_module_/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.18_powerpc_check] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/vlad/kernel.org/powerpc/linux-2.6.18' make: *** [kernel] Error 2 -- Build failed on powerpc with linux-2.6.19 Log: /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:831: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:834: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:835: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ make[4]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband] Error 2 make[1]: *** [_module_/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/vlad/kernel.org/powerpc/linux-2.6.19' make: *** [kernel] Error 2 -- Build failed on ppc64 with linux-2.6.16 Log: /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.16_ppc64_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_pd.c: In function ‘ehca_alloc_pd’: /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.16_ppc64_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_pd.c:53: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmem_cache_zalloc’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.16_ppc64_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_pd.c:53: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast make[4]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.16_ppc64_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_pd.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.16_ppc64_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.16_ppc64_check/drivers/infiniband] Error 2 make[1]: *** [_module_/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.16_ppc64_check] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/vlad/kernel.org/ppc64/linux-2.6.16' make: *** [kernel] Error 2 -- Build failed on powerpc with linux-2.6.17 Log: /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.17_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:831: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.17_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:834: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.17_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:835: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ make[4]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.17_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.17_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.17_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband] Error 2 make[1]: *** [_module_/home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070802-0201_linux-2.6.17_powerpc_check] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/vlad/kernel.org/powerpc/linux-2.6.17' make: *** [kernel] Error 2 -
