Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-22 Thread Jeremy Enos




I think the problem I'm seeing isn't kernel related... it's a problem
w/ the build process.  It's trying to write to a directory that hasn't
been created yet in the build root.

The error:
+ modsyms=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/Module.symvers
+ for modsym in '$modsyms'
+ cat /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/Module.symvers
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91zmLA: line 37:
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed20090922.x86_64//usr/src/ofa_kernel/Module.symvers:
No such file or directory

The script around line 37:
modsyms=`find $RPM_BUILD_DIR/ofa_kernel-1.5 -name Module.symvers -o
-name Modules.symvers`
for modsym in $modsyms
do
    cat $modsym >>
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT//usr/src/ofa_kernel/Module.symvers
done

The actual filesystem state:
[r...@33 ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed20090922.x86_64]# pwd
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed20090922.x86_64
[r...@33 ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed20090922.x86_64]# ls
lib
[r...@33 ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed20090922.x86_64]# 

Note the lack of a usr folder, hence the error.  Isn't anyone else
running into this?

    Jeremy

Jack Morgenstein wrote:

  On Thursday 10 September 2009 23:00, Jeremy Enos wrote:
  
  
 Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding this rpm with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm excluded- so I'm guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output (and last 50 lines of log) in case you can glean something useful from it.  Thank you-
 
     Jeremy
 
 Build ofa_kernel RPM
 Running rpmbuild --rebuild  --define '_topdir /var/tmp/OFED_topdir' --define 'configure_options   --with-core-mod --with-user_mad-mod --with-user_access-mod --with-addr_trans-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-nes-mod --with-qib-mod --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-rds-mod --with-qlgc_vnic-mod --with-iser-mod --with-nfsrdma-mod' --define 'build_kernel_ib 1' --define 'build_kernel_ib_devel 1' --define 'KVERSION 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64' --define 'K_SRC /lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/build' --define 'network_dir /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts' --define '_prefix /usr' --define '__arch_install_post %{nil}' /home-ib/ac/jenos/ofed/OFED-1.5-beta1/SRPMS/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.src.rpm
 Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM 
 See /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
 [r...@ac32 OFED-1.5-beta1]# tail -50 /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
     mkdir -p /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds; \
     mv /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/net/rds/rds*.ko /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/ ; \
     elif [ -d /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra ]; then \
     mkdir -p /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds; \
     mv /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/rds*.ko /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/ ; \
     fi;

  
  
I notice that you have a 2.6.30-based kernel.  The FC11 that we have here is 2.6.29-based:
  2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64

Has there been some change in FC11 that we are not aware of?
(the release notes for FC11 also state that it is 2.6.29-based).

That said, I notice that there is a bug in rds on our Fedora Core11 (2.6.29-based).
Andy, you need to put rds_to_2_6_28.patch into a 2.6.29 kernel_patches/backports directory.
There isn't one yet.

I can do this for you, but I suggest a rename to rds_to_2_6_29.patch for the file (in this directory
only).
Summary:  I will create kernel_patches/backport/2.6.29 directory, and put rds_to_2_6_29.patch inside.
  rds_to_2_6_29.patch is identical to rds_to_2_6_28.patch
  NOTE: as of now, there is no need for a separate 2.6.29_FC11 backports directory.  If the need
arises, we will create it.
 
If you ACK, I will take care of it.

-Jack

  



___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-14 Thread Andy Grover

Jack Morgenstein wrote:

That said, I notice that there is a bug in rds on our Fedora Core11 
(2.6.29-based).
Andy, you need to put rds_to_2_6_28.patch into a 2.6.29 
kernel_patches/backports directory.
There isn't one yet.

I can do this for you, but I suggest a rename to rds_to_2_6_29.patch for the 
file (in this directory
only).
Summary:  I will create kernel_patches/backport/2.6.29 directory, and put 
rds_to_2_6_29.patch inside.
  rds_to_2_6_29.patch is identical to rds_to_2_6_28.patch
  NOTE: as of now, there is no need for a separate 2.6.29_FC11 
backports directory.  If the need
arises, we will create it.
 
If you ACK, I will take care of it.


Sounds great, ACK, thanks.

Regards -- Andy

___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-13 Thread Jeremy Enos

Jack Morgenstein wrote:

On Thursday 10 September 2009 23:00, Jeremy Enos wrote:
  

 Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding this rpm 
with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm excluded- so I'm 
guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output (and last 50 lines of log) 
in case you can glean something useful from it.  Thank you-
 
 Jeremy
 
 Build ofa_kernel RPM

 Running rpmbuild --rebuild  --define '_topdir /var/tmp/OFED_topdir' --define 
'configure_options   --with-core-mod --with-user_mad-mod --with-user_access-mod 
--with-addr_trans-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod 
--with-cxgb3-mod --with-nes-mod --with-qib-mod --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod 
--with-rds-mod --with-qlgc_vnic-mod --with-iser-mod --with-nfsrdma-mod' 
--define 'build_kernel_ib 1' --define 'build_kernel_ib_devel 1' --define 
'KVERSION 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64' --define 'K_SRC 
/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/build' --define 'network_dir 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts' --define '_prefix /usr' --define 
'__arch_install_post %{nil}' 
/home-ib/ac/jenos/ofed/OFED-1.5-beta1/SRPMS/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.src.rpm
 Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM 
 See /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
 [r...@ac32 OFED-1.5-beta1]# tail -50 /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
 mkdir -p /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds; \

 mv 
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/net/rds/rds*.ko
 
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
 ; \
 elif [ -d 
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
 ]; then \
 mkdir -p 
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
 \
 mv 
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/rds*.ko
 
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
 ; \
 fi;



I notice that you have a 2.6.30-based kernel.  The FC11 that we have here is 
2.6.29-based:
  2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64

Has there been some change in FC11 that we are not aware of?
(the release notes for FC11 also state that it is 2.6.29-based).

  
Yep... your FC11 is not up to date.  An up to date FC11 runs kernel 
2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64.  (This is critical given recent kernel exploit 
vulnerabilities)

thx-

   Jeremy

That said, I notice that there is a bug in rds on our Fedora Core11 
(2.6.29-based).
Andy, you need to put rds_to_2_6_28.patch into a 2.6.29 
kernel_patches/backports directory.
There isn't one yet.

I can do this for you, but I suggest a rename to rds_to_2_6_29.patch for the 
file (in this directory
only).
Summary:  I will create kernel_patches/backport/2.6.29 directory, and put 
rds_to_2_6_29.patch inside.
  rds_to_2_6_29.patch is identical to rds_to_2_6_28.patch
  NOTE: as of now, there is no need for a separate 2.6.29_FC11 
backports directory.  If the need
arises, we will create it.
 
If you ACK, I will take care of it.


-Jack

  

___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-13 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Thursday 10 September 2009 23:00, Jeremy Enos wrote:
>  Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding this rpm 
> with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm excluded- so I'm 
> guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output (and last 50 lines of 
> log) in case you can glean something useful from it.  Thank you-
>  
>      Jeremy
>  
>  Build ofa_kernel RPM
>  Running rpmbuild --rebuild  --define '_topdir /var/tmp/OFED_topdir' --define 
> 'configure_options   --with-core-mod --with-user_mad-mod 
> --with-user_access-mod --with-addr_trans-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-mlx4-mod 
> --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-nes-mod --with-qib-mod 
> --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-rds-mod --with-qlgc_vnic-mod 
> --with-iser-mod --with-nfsrdma-mod' --define 'build_kernel_ib 1' --define 
> 'build_kernel_ib_devel 1' --define 'KVERSION 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64' 
> --define 'K_SRC /lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/build' --define 
> 'network_dir /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts' --define '_prefix /usr' --define 
> '__arch_install_post %{nil}' 
> /home-ib/ac/jenos/ofed/OFED-1.5-beta1/SRPMS/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.src.rpm
>  Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM 
>  See /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
>  [r...@ac32 OFED-1.5-beta1]# tail -50 
> /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
>      mkdir -p 
> /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
>  \
>      mv 
> /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/net/rds/rds*.ko
>  
> /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
>  ; \
>      elif [ -d 
> /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
>  ]; then \
>      mkdir -p 
> /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
>  \
>      mv 
> /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/rds*.ko
>  
> /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
>  ; \
>      fi;

I notice that you have a 2.6.30-based kernel.  The FC11 that we have here is 
2.6.29-based:
  2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64

Has there been some change in FC11 that we are not aware of?
(the release notes for FC11 also state that it is 2.6.29-based).

That said, I notice that there is a bug in rds on our Fedora Core11 
(2.6.29-based).
Andy, you need to put rds_to_2_6_28.patch into a 2.6.29 
kernel_patches/backports directory.
There isn't one yet.

I can do this for you, but I suggest a rename to rds_to_2_6_29.patch for the 
file (in this directory
only).
Summary:  I will create kernel_patches/backport/2.6.29 directory, and put 
rds_to_2_6_29.patch inside.
  rds_to_2_6_29.patch is identical to rds_to_2_6_28.patch
  NOTE: as of now, there is no need for a separate 2.6.29_FC11 
backports directory.  If the need
arises, we will create it.
 
If you ACK, I will take care of it.

-Jack
___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-11 Thread Jeremy Enos
If created in the wrong place though, why isn't this a universal 
problem?  Or is it?  thx-


   Jeremy

Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:00:56PM -0500, Jeremy Enos wrote:
  

Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding this rpm
with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm excluded- so I'm
guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output (and last 50 lines of log)
in case you can glean something useful from it.  Thank you-



Hmm.. looks like a scripting problem to me, no compiler errors hidden
someplace in that log?

  

if [ ! -n "/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64"
]; then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
++ find /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5 -name Module.symvers -o -name
Modules.symvers
+ modsyms=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/Module.symvers
+ for modsym in '$modsyms'
+ cat /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/Module.symvers
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7Js3WE: line 37: /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/
ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//usr/src/ofa_kernel/Module.symvers: No such
file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7Js3WE (%install)



Funky. Created it in the wrong place?

Jason

  

___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-11 Thread Jeremy Enos




Just tried a 1.5 beta build on Rawhide as of yesterday- still fails. 
Unless I've done something wrong, there is no Fedora past Fedora 9
(including pre-release stuff) that OFED builds on.  This seems so hard
to believe, I'm inclined to think I'm doing something wrong somewhere,
but the install script really doesn't give me much of a chance to mess
up.  I'm out of ideas- I don't know how important it is to OFED to
support Fedora, but it would be nice to have a firm idea of what the
future will be.
thx-

    Jeremy

Jeremy Enos wrote:

  
Additionally, I'd be happy to set up an FC11 sandbox system and give
you access if it's any help.
  
    Jeremy
  
Jeremy Enos wrote:
  

Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding
this rpm with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm
excluded- so I'm guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output
(and last 50 lines of log) in case you can glean something useful from
it.  Thank you-

    Jeremy

Build ofa_kernel RPM
Running rpmbuild --rebuild  --define '_topdir /var/tmp/OFED_topdir'
--define 'configure_options   --with-core-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-addr_trans-mod --with-mthca-mod
--with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-nes-mod
--with-qib-mod --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-rds-mod
--with-qlgc_vnic-mod --with-iser-mod --with-nfsrdma-mod' --define
'build_kernel_ib 1' --define 'build_kernel_ib_devel 1' --define
'KVERSION 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64' --define 'K_SRC
/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/build' --define 'network_dir
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts' --define '_prefix /usr' --define
'__arch_install_post %{nil}'
/home-ib/ac/jenos/ofed/OFED-1.5-beta1/SRPMS/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.src.rpm
Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM 
See /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
[r...@ac32 OFED-1.5-beta1]# tail -50
/tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/net/rds/rds*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
; \
    elif [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/rds*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
; \
    fi;
if [ ! -n
"/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64" ];
then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
# Copy new mlx4 kernel module to
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4
if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/drivers/net/mlx4
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    fi; \
    if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/drivers/net/mlx4
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4/
; \
    elif [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4/
; \
    fi;
if [ ! -n
"/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64" ];
then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
# Copy new infiniband kernel modules to
/var/

Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-10 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:00:56PM -0500, Jeremy Enos wrote:
> Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding this rpm
> with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm excluded- so I'm
> guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output (and last 50 lines of log)
> in case you can glean something useful from it.  Thank you-

Hmm.. looks like a scripting problem to me, no compiler errors hidden
someplace in that log?

> if [ ! -n "/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64"
> ]; then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
> ++ find /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5 -name Module.symvers -o 
> -name
> Modules.symvers
> + modsyms=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/Module.symvers
> + for modsym in '$modsyms'
> + cat /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/Module.symvers
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7Js3WE: line 37: /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/
> ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//usr/src/ofa_kernel/Module.symvers: No 
> such
> file or directory
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7Js3WE (%install)

Funky. Created it in the wrong place?

Jason
___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Enos




Additionally, I'd be happy to set up an FC11 sandbox system and give
you access if it's any help.

    Jeremy

Jeremy Enos wrote:

  
Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding
this rpm with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm
excluded- so I'm guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output
(and last 50 lines of log) in case you can glean something useful from
it.  Thank you-
  
    Jeremy
  
Build ofa_kernel RPM
Running rpmbuild --rebuild  --define '_topdir /var/tmp/OFED_topdir'
--define 'configure_options   --with-core-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-addr_trans-mod --with-mthca-mod
--with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-nes-mod
--with-qib-mod --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-rds-mod
--with-qlgc_vnic-mod --with-iser-mod --with-nfsrdma-mod' --define
'build_kernel_ib 1' --define 'build_kernel_ib_devel 1' --define
'KVERSION 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64' --define 'K_SRC
/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/build' --define 'network_dir
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts' --define '_prefix /usr' --define
'__arch_install_post %{nil}'
/home-ib/ac/jenos/ofed/OFED-1.5-beta1/SRPMS/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.src.rpm
Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM 
See /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
[r...@ac32 OFED-1.5-beta1]# tail -50
/tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/net/rds/rds*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
; \
    elif [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/rds*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
; \
    fi;
if [ ! -n
"/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64" ];
then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
# Copy new mlx4 kernel module to
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4
if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/drivers/net/mlx4
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    fi; \
    if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/drivers/net/mlx4
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4/
; \
    elif [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4/
; \
    fi;
if [ ! -n
"/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64" ];
then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
# Copy new infiniband kernel modules to
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/infiniband
if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/infiniband
]; then \
    /bin/rm -rf
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/infiniband;
\
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/dr

Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Enos




Fails w/ ofa_kernel like the others have... I didn't test excluding
this rpm with FC11, but the others also fail elsewhere w/ this rpm
excluded- so I'm guessing FC11 would as well.  I included the output
(and last 50 lines of log) in case you can glean something useful from
it.  Thank you-

    Jeremy

Build ofa_kernel RPM
Running rpmbuild --rebuild  --define '_topdir /var/tmp/OFED_topdir'
--define 'configure_options   --with-core-mod --with-user_mad-mod
--with-user_access-mod --with-addr_trans-mod --with-mthca-mod
--with-mlx4-mod --with-mlx4_en-mod --with-cxgb3-mod --with-nes-mod
--with-qib-mod --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-rds-mod
--with-qlgc_vnic-mod --with-iser-mod --with-nfsrdma-mod' --define
'build_kernel_ib 1' --define 'build_kernel_ib_devel 1' --define
'KVERSION 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64' --define 'K_SRC
/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/build' --define 'network_dir
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts' --define '_prefix /usr' --define
'__arch_install_post %{nil}'
/home-ib/ac/jenos/ofed/OFED-1.5-beta1/SRPMS/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.src.rpm
Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM 
See /tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
[r...@ac32 OFED-1.5-beta1]# tail -50
/tmp/OFED.1584.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log 
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/net/rds/rds*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
; \
    elif [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/rds*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/net/rds/
; \
    fi;
if [ ! -n
"/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64" ];
then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
# Copy new mlx4 kernel module to
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4
if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/drivers/net/mlx4
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    fi; \
    if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/drivers/net/mlx4
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4/
; \
    elif [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra
]; then \
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/mlx4*.ko
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/net/mlx4/
; \
    fi;
if [ ! -n
"/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64" ];
then /sbin/depmod -r -ae 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64;fi;
# Copy new infiniband kernel modules to
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/infiniband
if [ -d
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/infiniband
]; then \
    /bin/rm -rf
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers/infiniband;
\
    mkdir -p
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILDROOT/ofa_kernel-1.5-ofed1.5.beta1.x86_64//lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/updates/kernel/drivers;
\
    mv
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/infiniband
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/

Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-10 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:43:10PM -0500, Jeremy Enos wrote:

> So I accepted that I'd have to move Fedora version to get OFED
> support... and I was ok with that.  However, I see now that FC12 is
> not released, and won't be until November.  I have tested FC11, and
> it doesn't work w/ the OFED 1.5 beta1 either.  It seems OFED has
> skipped out on support for Fedora for like 1.5 years of release.
> Moving back to Fedora9 isn't really an option for me either...  so
> it looks like I'm out of options until November unless OFED were to
> target support for the latest /released/ Fedora OS instead of
> alpha/beta pre-releases.  :(

What doesn't work on FC11?

What would it take to fix this?

Jason
___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Enos




So I accepted that I'd have to move Fedora version to get OFED
support... and I was ok with that.  However, I see now that FC12 is not
released, and won't be until November.  I have tested FC11, and it
doesn't work w/ the OFED 1.5 beta1 either.  It seems OFED has skipped
out on support for Fedora for like 1.5 years of release.  Moving back
to Fedora9 isn't really an option for me either...  so it looks like
I'm out of options until November unless OFED were to target support
for the latest /released/ Fedora OS instead of alpha/beta
pre-releases.  :(

    Jeremy

Jack Morgenstein wrote:

  

  

  I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
FC10 use?
In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11
  
  

Actually, it supports FC12 (kernel 2.6.29).


  
  We had originally planned to support FC11 -- however, in the interim, FC12 was
released -- based on kernel 2.6.29, which is supported -- so we decided to support
FC12 instead.

-Jack
  

  
   Actually, Tziporet is correct.  FC11 is built on kernel 2.6.29.4-167.
 OFED 1.5 supports FC11 (I confused this with OpenSuse) -- No FC12 as yet.

 There is no support for FC10.

sorry about the mistake.
-Jack

  



___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-09-01 Thread Jeremy Enos
Though bad news, it's good news to get news.  :)  Now I have a direction 
to pursue.  FC11 next week.  thx-


   Jeremy

Jack Morgenstein wrote:
I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
FC10 use?

In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11
  
  

Actually, it supports FC12 (kernel 2.6.29).



We had originally planned to support FC11 -- however, in the interim, FC12 was
released -- based on kernel 2.6.29, which is supported -- so we decided to 
support
FC12 instead.

-Jack
  

 Actually, Tziporet is correct.  FC11 is built on kernel 2.6.29.4-167.
 OFED 1.5 supports FC11 (I confused this with OpenSuse) -- No FC12 as yet.

 There is no support for FC10.

sorry about the mistake.
-Jack

  

___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-31 Thread Jack Morgenstein
> >>> I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
> >>> FC10 use?
> >>> In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11
> >>>   
> >> Actually, it supports FC12 (kernel 2.6.29).
> >> 
> > We had originally planned to support FC11 -- however, in the interim, FC12 
> > was
> > released -- based on kernel 2.6.29, which is supported -- so we decided to 
> > support
> > FC12 instead.
> >
> > -Jack
 Actually, Tziporet is correct.  FC11 is built on kernel 2.6.29.4-167.
 OFED 1.5 supports FC11 (I confused this with OpenSuse) -- No FC12 as yet.

 There is no support for FC10.

sorry about the mistake.
-Jack
___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-30 Thread Jeremy Enos
Is it supposed to support FC10 as well then, or just fc12?  Actually- it 
wouldn't matter if I couldn't use 1.5.  I just want *some* version that 
supports FC10.  Is there one?

thx-

   Jeremy

Jack Morgenstein wrote:

On Sunday 30 August 2009 18:47, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
  

On Sunday 23 August 2009 11:16, Tziporet Koren wrote:


Jeremy Enos wrote:
  
Coming up on a year of Fedora 10 GA...  Fedora 9 no longer maintained. 
No OFED support for FC10 yet creates a tough spot if trying to stay
secure.  Is there *any* version (1.5, etc) that will even build on FC10? 
thx-


Jeremy


  

I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
FC10 use?

In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11
  

Actually, it supports FC12 (kernel 2.6.29).


We had originally planned to support FC11 -- however, in the interim, FC12 was
released -- based on kernel 2.6.29, which is supported -- so we decided to 
support
FC12 instead.

-Jack

  

- Jack



Tziporet


___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

  


  

___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-30 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Sunday 30 August 2009 18:47, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
> On Sunday 23 August 2009 11:16, Tziporet Koren wrote:
> > Jeremy Enos wrote:
> > > Coming up on a year of Fedora 10 GA...  Fedora 9 no longer maintained. 
> > > No OFED support for FC10 yet creates a tough spot if trying to stay
> > > secure.  Is there *any* version (1.5, etc) that will even build on FC10? 
> > > thx-
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > 
> > I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
> > FC10 use?
> > In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11
> Actually, it supports FC12 (kernel 2.6.29).
We had originally planned to support FC11 -- however, in the interim, FC12 was
released -- based on kernel 2.6.29, which is supported -- so we decided to 
support
FC12 instead.

-Jack

> - Jack
> 
> > Tziporet
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > general mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> > 
> > To unsubscribe, please visit 
> > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> > 
> 
___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-30 Thread Jack Morgenstein
On Sunday 23 August 2009 11:16, Tziporet Koren wrote:
> Jeremy Enos wrote:
> > Coming up on a year of Fedora 10 GA...  Fedora 9 no longer maintained. 
> > No OFED support for FC10 yet creates a tough spot if trying to stay
> > secure.  Is there *any* version (1.5, etc) that will even build on FC10? 
> > thx-
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
> FC10 use?
> In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11
Actually, it supports FC12 (kernel 2.6.29).
- Jack

> Tziporet
> 
> 
> ___
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-27 Thread Jeremy Enos




Is this concerning at all?  (specific reference to sles11)

-include
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/include/linux/autoconf.h \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.27_sles11/include/

It's doing this on a FC10 box.

	Jeremy


Jeremy Enos wrote:

  Latest available 1.5 tar fails w/ this error building.  This an fc10 x64
machine up to date as of last week.
thx-

Jeremy

Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM
See /tmp/OFED.26978.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log

[r...@ac27 OFED-1.5-20090825-0729]# tail -50
/tmp/OFED.26978.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log
mkdir -p /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/.tmp_versions ; rm -f
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/.tmp_versions/*
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5
make -f scripts/Makefile.build
obj=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband
make -f scripts/Makefile.build
obj=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core
  gcc
-Wp,-MD,/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/.addr.o.d 
-nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.2/include
-D__KERNEL__ \
-D__OFED_BUILD__ \
-include include/linux/autoconf.h \
-include
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/include/linux/autoconf.h \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.27_sles11/include/
\
 \
 \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/include \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/debug \
-I/usr/local/include/scst \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/net/cxgb3 \
-Iinclude \
 \
-I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.27.29-170.2.79.fc10.x86_64/arch/x86/include \
 -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Os -m64 -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone
-mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args
-DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
-Iinclude/asm-x86/mach-default -fno-stack-protector
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -g
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow
-DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(addr)" 
-D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(ib_addr)" -c -o
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.o
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
In file included from
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.27_sles11/include/linux/cpumask.h:7,
 from include/asm/paravirt.h:33,
 from include/asm/page.h:159,
 from include/asm/pda.h:9,
 from include/asm/current.h:20,
 from include/asm/processor.h:16,
 from include/linux/prefetch.h:15,
 from include/linux/list.h:7,
 from include/linux/mutex.h:14,
 from
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c:37:
include/asm/topology.h: In function 'cpu_to_node':
include/asm/topology.h:93: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_pda'
include/asm/topology.h:93: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
include/asm/topology.h: In function 'early_cpu_to_node':
include/asm/topology.h:102: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have
'int')
make[4]: ***
[/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.o]
Error 1
make[3]: ***
[/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core] Error 2
make[2]: ***
[/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband] Error 2
make[1]: *** [_module_/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.27.29-170.2.79.fc10.x86_64'
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ynduey (%build)


RPM build errors:
user vlad does not exist - using root
group vlad does not exist - using root
user vlad does not exist - using root
group vlad does not exist - using root
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ynduey (%build)
[r...@ac27 OFED-1.5-20090825-0729]# uname -r
2.6.27.29-170.2.79.fc10.x86_64
[r...@ac27 OFED-1.5-20090825-0729]#


Jeremy Enos wrote:
  
  
2.6.27.29-170.2.79 is the current fc10 x64 kernel.  I had tried the
latest tarball for 1.5- perhaps that's too late?  I can try something
older but would be great to have a starting point.  Thx-

   Jeremy

Tziporet Koren wrote:


  Jeremy Enos wrote:
  
  
Coming up on a year of Fedora 10 GA...  Fedora 9 no longer
maintained. No OFED support for FC10 yet creates a tough spot if
trying to stay
secure.  Is there *any* version (1.5, etc) that will even build on
FC10? thx-

Jeremy


  

  
  I t

Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-25 Thread Jeremy Enos
Latest available 1.5 tar fails w/ this error building.  This an fc10 x64
machine up to date as of last week.
thx-

Jeremy

Failed to build ofa_kernel RPM
See /tmp/OFED.26978.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log

[r...@ac27 OFED-1.5-20090825-0729]# tail -50
/tmp/OFED.26978.logs/ofa_kernel.rpmbuild.log
mkdir -p /var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/.tmp_versions ; rm -f
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/.tmp_versions/*
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5
make -f scripts/Makefile.build
obj=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband
make -f scripts/Makefile.build
obj=/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core
  gcc
-Wp,-MD,/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/.addr.o.d
 
-nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.2/include
-D__KERNEL__ \
-D__OFED_BUILD__ \
-include include/linux/autoconf.h \
-include
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/include/linux/autoconf.h \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.27_sles11/include/
\
 \
 \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/include \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/debug \
-I/usr/local/include/scst \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt \
-I/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/net/cxgb3 \
-Iinclude \
 \
-I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.27.29-170.2.79.fc10.x86_64/arch/x86/include \
 -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Os -m64 -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone
-mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args
-DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
-Iinclude/asm-x86/mach-default -fno-stack-protector
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -g
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow
-DMODULE -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(addr)" 
-D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(ib_addr)" -c -o
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.o
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
In file included from
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.27_sles11/include/linux/cpumask.h:7,
 from include/asm/paravirt.h:33,
 from include/asm/page.h:159,
 from include/asm/pda.h:9,
 from include/asm/current.h:20,
 from include/asm/processor.h:16,
 from include/linux/prefetch.h:15,
 from include/linux/list.h:7,
 from include/linux/mutex.h:14,
 from
/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c:37:
include/asm/topology.h: In function 'cpu_to_node':
include/asm/topology.h:93: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_pda'
include/asm/topology.h:93: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
include/asm/topology.h: In function 'early_cpu_to_node':
include/asm/topology.h:102: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have
'int')
make[4]: ***
[/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.o]
Error 1
make[3]: ***
[/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband/core] Error 2
make[2]: ***
[/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5/drivers/infiniband] Error 2
make[1]: *** [_module_/var/tmp/OFED_topdir/BUILD/ofa_kernel-1.5] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.27.29-170.2.79.fc10.x86_64'
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ynduey (%build)


RPM build errors:
user vlad does not exist - using root
group vlad does not exist - using root
user vlad does not exist - using root
group vlad does not exist - using root
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ynduey (%build)
[r...@ac27 OFED-1.5-20090825-0729]# uname -r
2.6.27.29-170.2.79.fc10.x86_64
[r...@ac27 OFED-1.5-20090825-0729]#


Jeremy Enos wrote:
> 2.6.27.29-170.2.79 is the current fc10 x64 kernel.  I had tried the
> latest tarball for 1.5- perhaps that's too late?  I can try something
> older but would be great to have a starting point.  Thx-
>
>Jeremy
>
> Tziporet Koren wrote:
>> Jeremy Enos wrote:
>>> Coming up on a year of Fedora 10 GA...  Fedora 9 no longer
>>> maintained. No OFED support for FC10 yet creates a tough spot if
>>> trying to stay
>>> secure.  Is there *any* version (1.5, etc) that will even build on
>>> FC10? thx-
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>
>> I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version
>> FC10 use?
>> In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11
>>
>> Tziporet
>>
>>
>
___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsu

Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-24 Thread Jeremy Enos
2.6.27.29-170.2.79 is the current fc10 x64 kernel.  I had tried the 
latest tarball for 1.5- perhaps that's too late?  I can try something 
older but would be great to have a starting point.  Thx-


   Jeremy

Tziporet Koren wrote:

Jeremy Enos wrote:
Coming up on a year of Fedora 10 GA...  Fedora 9 no longer 
maintained. No OFED support for FC10 yet creates a tough spot if 
trying to stay
secure.  Is there *any* version (1.5, etc) that will even build on 
FC10? thx-


Jeremy


  


I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
FC10 use?

In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11

Tziporet



___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [ofa-general] Fedora 10 OFED support plans

2009-08-23 Thread Tziporet Koren

Jeremy Enos wrote:
Coming up on a year of Fedora 10 GA...  Fedora 9 no longer maintained. 
No OFED support for FC10 yet creates a tough spot if trying to stay
secure.  Is there *any* version (1.5, etc) that will even build on FC10? 
thx-


Jeremy


  


I think OFED 1.5 might work on it but not sure. Which kernel version 
FC10 use?

In general OFED 1.5 supports FC11

Tziporet


___
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general