aking network configuration (software+hardware)
for an index of this size.
Thank you.
Slava Imeshev
exes. This works
> fine on commodity hardware, and you will be IO bound, so get multiple drives
> in each machine.
>
> Out of curiosity, what project are you working on? That's a lot of hits!
>
> Sincerely,
> James Ryley, Ph.D.
> www.FreePatentsOnline.com
>
&
x and the "dog" in another.
Slava
>
> Sincerely,
> James Ryley, Ph.D.
> www.FreePatentsOnline.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Slava Imeshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 2:28 PM
> > To: general@lucene.apache.org
increased.
I think I oversimplified the problem with this example.
Slava
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Slava Imeshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:59 PM
> > To: general@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Infrastructure for
y issues hopefully don't mean one index is getting pounded
> while others are inactive for certain searches).
Yes, this is valid concern.
Slava
>
> Sincerely,
> James
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Slava Imeshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
-- James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the index is broken into multiple "shards" then we need multiple copies
> of each shard, and some way of loadbalancing and failing over amongst copies
> of shards.
>
> Yep. Unfortunately it's not simple, but those are all pieces of what we are
> currentl
Doug,
--- Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the availability of this approach doesn't scale very cleanly though ... if
> > any one box in either cluster goes down, the entire cluster becomes
> > unusable.
>
> A cost-effective variation works as follows: if you have 10 indexes and
> 11
Hello everyone,
Is it possible to pass the QueryParser a query that uses
a field that contains spaces in its name? Apparently
stuff like this doesn't work:
+"my field with spaces":test
Thanks.
Slava
