Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9-build2 nexus only

2017-07-25 Thread Glenn Adams 
Please change the version number to a standard format, such as 1.9.1.

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Simon Steiner 
wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> The vote will end on 1/8/2017
>
> +1 from me.
>
> The batik 1.9 nexus release was built by hand and had a few errors due to
> some poms having wrong info.
>
> I have rebuilt batik maven artifacts using:
> mvn clean javadoc:jar source:jar repository:bundle-create -B
>
> Followed by signing using:
> import os
> def addasc(bundle, afile):
> os.system('jar xf ' + bundle + ' ' + afile)
> if os.path.exists(afile):
> os.remove(afile + '.asc')
> os.system('gpg --armor --detach-sign --force-v3-sigs --batch
> --verbose ' + afile)
> os.system('jar uf ' + bundle + ' ' + afile + '.asc')
> os.remove(afile)
> os.remove(afile + '.asc')
>
> for bundle in os.listdir('.'):
> if bundle.endswith('bundle.jar'):
> addasc(bundle, 'pom.xml')
> addasc(bundle, bundle.replace('-bundle', ''))
> addasc(bundle, bundle.replace('-bundle', '-javadoc'))
> addasc(bundle, bundle.replace('-bundle', '-sources'))
>
> Can be tested using in a pom:
>
>   org.apache.xmlgraphics
>   batik-all
>   1.9-build2
> 
>
> And settings.xml:
> 
>   
> 
>   myprofile
>   
> 
>   my-repo2
>   your custom repo
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging
> 
>   
> 
>   
>   
> myprofile
>   
> 
>
> Thanks
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJZd0W9AAoJEFuT8d98223qKNkP/iznsXlYftrDHWtAqiG6mMZs
> bjyCVv2wrYrQ4PF8YB1OxIEKk+27XndPif+4SqCipUhiHif+SldACWiwoYABdD8H
> 0GAjBylSGWUEukiR6zL59nWgA/ODZwGPq/PpTrGeM933EBiXEob/UtaUdxaU4R62
> pu5RF3v9PgZVbwztIXuVlRB4Vcrlmpig5yygoUdf+BIy42v9BJn4ViI9KUdW2M9h
> cc0DZCazLi2e/r9p9BAH0rIW8wmliupRafBj1z3rlcF/uUOEiBYF5IePspkg2z4m
> NSCXYl6ciuEqHGXxcYSkEMhxTykKEI7DSOk/Q0dwATUj44UaJNvO3ARdXtbvVWXW
> TAcVdvoWHLb7lTmjWNyqnt19goptkLUHNLUGAq3/ljf1jcBuofmRWw6JAwAMWBbR
> xl43e2aWYubd5hc/VodV83yXh9nKZpxWq8kv+Mx1uevX5ddQThlidUoo+Ne3mBX2
> p5We5lbKmmQcNQCKtyUs0VtQ67FvlsJZTSaQQ3cOIYP07BSGDIrMfhFTBtd4HSde
> aOa9NhMG3NRiq669GJ/UDzRQHuAp4gR2hfkoJyKLD5uCA05eQeF5FKlJkfeQPHjL
> EiAZVku3fLwdwnY+cSGbFKh8Rg8FR95xVH3pJmp+UniV5o2N6yrQpJAfqW9+fhE0
> LXtDrTBthombwrYiE3s+
> =3JIW
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

[VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9-build2 nexus only

2017-07-25 Thread Simon Steiner 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

The vote will end on 1/8/2017

+1 from me.

The batik 1.9 nexus release was built by hand and had a few errors due to
some poms having wrong info.

I have rebuilt batik maven artifacts using:
mvn clean javadoc:jar source:jar repository:bundle-create -B

Followed by signing using:
import os
def addasc(bundle, afile):
os.system('jar xf ' + bundle + ' ' + afile)
if os.path.exists(afile):
os.remove(afile + '.asc')
os.system('gpg --armor --detach-sign --force-v3-sigs --batch
--verbose ' + afile)
os.system('jar uf ' + bundle + ' ' + afile + '.asc')
os.remove(afile)
os.remove(afile + '.asc')  

for bundle in os.listdir('.'):
if bundle.endswith('bundle.jar'):
addasc(bundle, 'pom.xml')
addasc(bundle, bundle.replace('-bundle', ''))
addasc(bundle, bundle.replace('-bundle', '-javadoc'))
addasc(bundle, bundle.replace('-bundle', '-sources'))

Can be tested using in a pom:
   
  org.apache.xmlgraphics
  batik-all
  1.9-build2


And settings.xml:

  

  myprofile
  

  my-repo2
  your custom repo
 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging

  

  
  
myprofile
  


Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=3JIW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (3rd attempt)

2017-04-04 Thread Glenn Adams 
+1

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Simon Steiner 
wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. (Since last vote: updated
> serializer, fop-transcoder-allinone, xgc in pom and show line numbers on
> exception)
>
>
>
> Artifacts can be found there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>
>
>
> The release is signed with the key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will end on 4/4/2017
>
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2nA3AAoJEFuT8d98223qMzoP/1KlhY6uvheShfAZCt4PSxtc
>
> U4y5Wu1N7qICIfUobE2EjpgEYjGVdZhPH5DkdbFB5pcMHA2lEjoHntHC3CDrIu9S
>
> jXxIYTe7g9U6VBjAOvZ915lIp5PXLAm9d8R02SLE0MR2UTSl1S33UzfYaFOLW0/7
>
> 8HhySYZtplJb368X17iJR5duwm+WU7xeNBtEGI7jFxmbIlz6WF3RdmYXhqrYBkMo
>
> UgycownoJ264FkZHWjdfMQBnvBHqv/AEOUQyQj1F+iR54CyV3MoDrixIKDkoWPbq
>
> LMlAZcBTf2PfsFrRNTZnAvPsy64dqsR/b6AzhyC48MOhCtN3FVYDSxgcQqb7S7i+
>
> qqgZmTgJdSnCP8wLL39rF9iKMAmg0Zt0nUr0m90KmqiANe2/VexHBT21YMvq6r7D
>
> 9AFpfj/OzCToG7B4VH6cwVnR0gi6f4GCm6t5u+AKSAHXf40HO3ybvBXC+qN5LJbx
>
> Bwk431gEjHFOEtfG5+/7EcRrK+ql2GeaCN7RcbhekYPrLQ0UMI5hRcECYQ531/ku
>
> 8EDQyqQ258TmClPkC2tt+Xi74rLSU8oSiMCeHiAzCWxVkTr375fSLJffsXl0EbGb
>
> bZ2+VNJFGDUaGNFfnN7j8JkVsciqZlmZDfjUXstn1WtVFncuWPLfPEISL5iBE4AI
>
> bu9Cjl69eyC7HG1SaByO
>
> =YFuF
>
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (3rd attempt)

2017-03-30 Thread Pascal Sancho 
+1

2017-03-30 8:49 GMT+02:00 Chris :
> +1
>
> On 28/03/2017 15:18, Simon Steiner wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. (Since last vote: updated
>> serializer, fop-transcoder-allinone, xgc in pom and show line numbers on
>> exception)
>>
>>
>>
>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>
>>
>>
>> The release is signed with the key:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>
>>
>>
>> The vote will end on 4/4/2017
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>
>>
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2nA3AAoJEFuT8d98223qMzoP/1KlhY6uvheShfAZCt4PSxtc
>>
>> U4y5Wu1N7qICIfUobE2EjpgEYjGVdZhPH5DkdbFB5pcMHA2lEjoHntHC3CDrIu9S
>>
>> jXxIYTe7g9U6VBjAOvZ915lIp5PXLAm9d8R02SLE0MR2UTSl1S33UzfYaFOLW0/7
>>
>> 8HhySYZtplJb368X17iJR5duwm+WU7xeNBtEGI7jFxmbIlz6WF3RdmYXhqrYBkMo
>>
>> UgycownoJ264FkZHWjdfMQBnvBHqv/AEOUQyQj1F+iR54CyV3MoDrixIKDkoWPbq
>>
>> LMlAZcBTf2PfsFrRNTZnAvPsy64dqsR/b6AzhyC48MOhCtN3FVYDSxgcQqb7S7i+
>>
>> qqgZmTgJdSnCP8wLL39rF9iKMAmg0Zt0nUr0m90KmqiANe2/VexHBT21YMvq6r7D
>>
>> 9AFpfj/OzCToG7B4VH6cwVnR0gi6f4GCm6t5u+AKSAHXf40HO3ybvBXC+qN5LJbx
>>
>> Bwk431gEjHFOEtfG5+/7EcRrK+ql2GeaCN7RcbhekYPrLQ0UMI5hRcECYQ531/ku
>>
>> 8EDQyqQ258TmClPkC2tt+Xi74rLSU8oSiMCeHiAzCWxVkTr375fSLJffsXl0EbGb
>>
>> bZ2+VNJFGDUaGNFfnN7j8JkVsciqZlmZDfjUXstn1WtVFncuWPLfPEISL5iBE4AI
>>
>> bu9Cjl69eyC7HG1SaByO
>>
>> =YFuF
>>
>> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>



-- 
pascal

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (3rd attempt)

2017-03-29 Thread Clay Leeds 
+1

Warm regards,

Clay Leeds  -  the.webmaes...@gmail.com
"My religion is simple. My religion is kindness."
HH the Dalai Lama of Tibet

> On Mar 28, 2017, at 7:18 AM, Simon Steiner  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. (Since last vote: updated
> serializer, fop-transcoder-allinone, xgc in pom and show line numbers on
> exception)
> 
> 
> 
> Artifacts can be found there:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> 
> 
> 
> The release is signed with the key:
> 
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will end on 4/4/2017
> 
> 
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> 
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2nA3AAoJEFuT8d98223qMzoP/1KlhY6uvheShfAZCt4PSxtc
> 
> U4y5Wu1N7qICIfUobE2EjpgEYjGVdZhPH5DkdbFB5pcMHA2lEjoHntHC3CDrIu9S
> 
> jXxIYTe7g9U6VBjAOvZ915lIp5PXLAm9d8R02SLE0MR2UTSl1S33UzfYaFOLW0/7
> 
> 8HhySYZtplJb368X17iJR5duwm+WU7xeNBtEGI7jFxmbIlz6WF3RdmYXhqrYBkMo
> 
> UgycownoJ264FkZHWjdfMQBnvBHqv/AEOUQyQj1F+iR54CyV3MoDrixIKDkoWPbq
> 
> LMlAZcBTf2PfsFrRNTZnAvPsy64dqsR/b6AzhyC48MOhCtN3FVYDSxgcQqb7S7i+
> 
> qqgZmTgJdSnCP8wLL39rF9iKMAmg0Zt0nUr0m90KmqiANe2/VexHBT21YMvq6r7D
> 
> 9AFpfj/OzCToG7B4VH6cwVnR0gi6f4GCm6t5u+AKSAHXf40HO3ybvBXC+qN5LJbx
> 
> Bwk431gEjHFOEtfG5+/7EcRrK+ql2GeaCN7RcbhekYPrLQ0UMI5hRcECYQ531/ku
> 
> 8EDQyqQ258TmClPkC2tt+Xi74rLSU8oSiMCeHiAzCWxVkTr375fSLJffsXl0EbGb
> 
> bZ2+VNJFGDUaGNFfnN7j8JkVsciqZlmZDfjUXstn1WtVFncuWPLfPEISL5iBE4AI
> 
> bu9Cjl69eyC7HG1SaByO
> 
> =YFuF
> 
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (3rd attempt)

2017-03-29 Thread Andreas Delmelle 
+1

Cheers

Andreas


> On 28 Mar 2017, at 16:18, Simon Steiner  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. (Since last vote: updated
> serializer, fop-transcoder-allinone, xgc in pom and show line numbers on
> exception)
> 
> 
> 
> Artifacts can be found there:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> 
> 
> 
> The release is signed with the key:
> 
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will end on 4/4/2017
> 
> 
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> 
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2nA3AAoJEFuT8d98223qMzoP/1KlhY6uvheShfAZCt4PSxtc
> 
> U4y5Wu1N7qICIfUobE2EjpgEYjGVdZhPH5DkdbFB5pcMHA2lEjoHntHC3CDrIu9S
> 
> jXxIYTe7g9U6VBjAOvZ915lIp5PXLAm9d8R02SLE0MR2UTSl1S33UzfYaFOLW0/7
> 
> 8HhySYZtplJb368X17iJR5duwm+WU7xeNBtEGI7jFxmbIlz6WF3RdmYXhqrYBkMo
> 
> UgycownoJ264FkZHWjdfMQBnvBHqv/AEOUQyQj1F+iR54CyV3MoDrixIKDkoWPbq
> 
> LMlAZcBTf2PfsFrRNTZnAvPsy64dqsR/b6AzhyC48MOhCtN3FVYDSxgcQqb7S7i+
> 
> qqgZmTgJdSnCP8wLL39rF9iKMAmg0Zt0nUr0m90KmqiANe2/VexHBT21YMvq6r7D
> 
> 9AFpfj/OzCToG7B4VH6cwVnR0gi6f4GCm6t5u+AKSAHXf40HO3ybvBXC+qN5LJbx
> 
> Bwk431gEjHFOEtfG5+/7EcRrK+ql2GeaCN7RcbhekYPrLQ0UMI5hRcECYQ531/ku
> 
> 8EDQyqQ258TmClPkC2tt+Xi74rLSU8oSiMCeHiAzCWxVkTr375fSLJffsXl0EbGb
> 
> bZ2+VNJFGDUaGNFfnN7j8JkVsciqZlmZDfjUXstn1WtVFncuWPLfPEISL5iBE4AI
> 
> bu9Cjl69eyC7HG1SaByO
> 
> =YFuF
> 
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

[VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (3rd attempt)

2017-03-28 Thread Simon Steiner 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hash: SHA1

 

Hi,

 

This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. (Since last vote: updated
serializer, fop-transcoder-allinone, xgc in pom and show line numbers on
exception)

 

Artifacts can be found there:

http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/

 

The release is signed with the key:

https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS

 

The vote will end on 4/4/2017

 

+1 from me.

 

Thanks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Version: GnuPG v1

 

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2nA3AAoJEFuT8d98223qMzoP/1KlhY6uvheShfAZCt4PSxtc

U4y5Wu1N7qICIfUobE2EjpgEYjGVdZhPH5DkdbFB5pcMHA2lEjoHntHC3CDrIu9S

jXxIYTe7g9U6VBjAOvZ915lIp5PXLAm9d8R02SLE0MR2UTSl1S33UzfYaFOLW0/7

8HhySYZtplJb368X17iJR5duwm+WU7xeNBtEGI7jFxmbIlz6WF3RdmYXhqrYBkMo

UgycownoJ264FkZHWjdfMQBnvBHqv/AEOUQyQj1F+iR54CyV3MoDrixIKDkoWPbq

LMlAZcBTf2PfsFrRNTZnAvPsy64dqsR/b6AzhyC48MOhCtN3FVYDSxgcQqb7S7i+

qqgZmTgJdSnCP8wLL39rF9iKMAmg0Zt0nUr0m90KmqiANe2/VexHBT21YMvq6r7D

9AFpfj/OzCToG7B4VH6cwVnR0gi6f4GCm6t5u+AKSAHXf40HO3ybvBXC+qN5LJbx

Bwk431gEjHFOEtfG5+/7EcRrK+ql2GeaCN7RcbhekYPrLQ0UMI5hRcECYQ531/ku

8EDQyqQ258TmClPkC2tt+Xi74rLSU8oSiMCeHiAzCWxVkTr375fSLJffsXl0EbGb

bZ2+VNJFGDUaGNFfnN7j8JkVsciqZlmZDfjUXstn1WtVFncuWPLfPEISL5iBE4AI

bu9Cjl69eyC7HG1SaByO

=YFuF

-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-28 Thread Chris 
Simon,

I would rephrase it as: When we are releasing all the projects together 
(which is the case today), then we should try to sync up the bundled 
JARs. When we are only releasing FOP it is clear the previous Batik 
release would then be out of date.

Thanks

Chris

On 28/03/2017 11:03, Simon Steiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since batik includes fop-transcoder-allinone-*.jar and fop includes 
> batik-all-*.jar, we would always need to release both these projects together 
> at the same time.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris [mailto:bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 28 March 2017 10:30
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> I agree we should be sync'ing the releases.
>
> On 27/03/2017 22:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
>> Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to
>> sync them. Also, please update FOP to use the same
>> xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as is used by Batik.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner
>> <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to
>>> redo the other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a 
>>> mess.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
>>> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
>>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>
>>> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version
>>> discrepancies between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK
>>> source and binary
>>> artifacts:
>>>
>>>  - FOP 2.2 has
>>> - serializer-2.7.0.jar
>>>  - BATIK 1.9 has
>>> - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>>>
>>> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I
>>> would expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
>>>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases
>>>>> which was eg 1.8.
>>>>>
>>>> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to
>>>> keep an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should
>>>> have a discussion on version policy for both dev and release
>>>> processes; for example, we now need to choose dev versions for use
>>>> in upcoming work beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the
>>>> following should we use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to 
>>>> the next release:
>>>>
>>>>  - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>>>>  - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>>  - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>>
>>>> what do others think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>>>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>>>>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>>>
>>>>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>  - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>>>>  - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>>>>  instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0
>>>>> (for batik).
>>>>>  The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
>>>>> have been
>>>>>  2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAP

RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-28 Thread Simon Steiner 
Hi,

Since batik includes fop-transcoder-allinone-*.jar and fop includes 
batik-all-*.jar, we would always need to release both these projects together 
at the same time.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: 28 March 2017 10:30
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

I agree we should be sync'ing the releases.

On 27/03/2017 22:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to 
> sync them. Also, please update FOP to use the same 
> xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as is used by Batik.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner 
> <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to 
>> redo the other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a 
>> mess.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
>> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version 
>> discrepancies between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK 
>> source and binary
>> artifacts:
>>
>> - FOP 2.2 has
>>- serializer-2.7.0.jar
>> - BATIK 1.9 has
>>- xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>>
>> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I 
>> would expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner < 
>>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases 
>>>> which was eg 1.8.
>>>>
>>> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to 
>>> keep an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should 
>>> have a discussion on version policy for both dev and release 
>>> processes; for example, we now need to choose dev versions for use 
>>> in upcoming work beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the 
>>> following should we use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the 
>>> next release:
>>>
>>> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> what do others think?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>>>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>>
>>>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>>>
>>>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 
>>>> (for batik).
>>>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process 
>>>> have been
>>>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>>>> qualifier
>>>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have 
>>>> deleted
>> the
>>>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end 
>>>> up causing
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> G.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner < 
>>>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>>>
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>&

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-28 Thread Chris 
Hi Glenn,

On 27/03/2017 20:35, Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was
>> eg 1.8.
>>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep an
> eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work beyond
> this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we use for FOP
> dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?

2.3-SNAPSHOT is fine. We do releases quite infrequently, so it seems 
unlikely we will be using the third digit with the current yearly 
release cycle.

>
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>> batik).
>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>> causing
>> problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
>>> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The release is signed with the key:
>>>
>>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>>>
>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>>>
>>> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>>>
>>> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>>>
>>> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>>>
>>> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>>>
>>> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>>>
>>> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>>>
>>> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>>>
>>> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>>>
>>> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>>>
>>> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>>>
>>> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>>>
>>> =dYHK
>>>
>>> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-28 Thread Chris 
I agree we should be sync'ing the releases.

On 27/03/2017 22:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to sync
> them. Also, please update FOP to use the same xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as
> is used by Batik.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the
>> other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
>> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies
>> between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
>> artifacts:
>>
>> - FOP 2.2 has
>>- serializer-2.7.0.jar
>> - BATIK 1.9 has
>>- xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>>
>> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would
>> expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
>>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which
>>>> was eg 1.8.
>>>>
>>> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep
>>> an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
>>> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
>>> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work
>>> beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we
>>> use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>>>
>>> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> what do others think?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>>>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>>
>>>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>>>
>>>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>>>> batik).
>>>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
>>>> have been
>>>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>>>> qualifier
>>>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted
>> the
>>>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>>>> causing
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> G.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>>>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>>>
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
>>>>> zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>&

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams 
Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to sync
them. Also, please update FOP to use the same xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as
is used by Batik.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the
> other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> Hi,
>
> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies
> between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
> artifacts:
>
>- FOP 2.2 has
>   - serializer-2.7.0.jar
>- BATIK 1.9 has
>   - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>
> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would
> expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
> > simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which
> >> was eg 1.8.
> >>
> >
> > understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep
> > an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> > discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> > example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work
> > beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we
> > use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
> >
> >- 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> >- 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> >- 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > what do others think?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> >> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
> >> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
> >>
> >> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
> >>
> >>- Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
> >>- I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
> >>instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
> >> batik).
> >>The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
> >> have been
> >>2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
> >> qualifier
> >>is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted
> the
> >>final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
> >> causing
> >>problems.
> >>
> >> G.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
> >> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> >
> >> > Hash: SHA1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
> >> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Artifacts can be found there:
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The release is signed with the key:
> >> >
> >> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > +1 from me.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> &g

RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Simon Steiner 
Hi,

Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the 
other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

Hi,

Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies 
between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
artifacts:

   - FOP 2.2 has
  - serializer-2.7.0.jar
   - BATIK 1.9 has
  - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar

Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would 
expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner < 
> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which 
>> was eg 1.8.
>>
>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep 
> an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a 
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for 
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work 
> beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we 
> use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
>- 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>- 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>- 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>>- Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>- I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for 
>> batik).
>>The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process 
>> have been
>>2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>>is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>>final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up 
>> causing
>>problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner < 
>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> >
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source 
>> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Artifacts can be found there:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The release is signed with the key:
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>> >
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>> >
>> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>> >
>> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>> >
>> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>> >
>> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>> >
>> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>> >
>> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>> >
>> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>> >
>> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>> >
>> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>> >
>> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>> >
>> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>> >
>> > =dYHK
>> >
>> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Simon Steiner 
Hi,

Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com] 
Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies 
between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
artifacts:

   - FOP 2.2 has
  - serializer-2.7.0.jar
   - BATIK 1.9 has
  - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar

Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would 
expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner < 
> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which 
>> was eg 1.8.
>>
>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep 
> an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a 
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for 
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work 
> beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we 
> use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
>- 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>- 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>- 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>>- Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>- I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for 
>> batik).
>>The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process 
>> have been
>>2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>>is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>>final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up 
>> causing
>>problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner < 
>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> >
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source 
>> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Artifacts can be found there:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The release is signed with the key:
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>> >
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>> >
>> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>> >
>> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>> >
>> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>> >
>> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>> >
>> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>> >
>> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>> >
>> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>> >
>> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>> >
>> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>> >
>> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>> >
>> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>> >
>> > =dYHK
>> >
>> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams 
On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies
between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
artifacts:

   - FOP 2.2 has
  - serializer-2.7.0.jar
   - BATIK 1.9 has
  - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar

Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would
expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was
>> eg 1.8.
>>
>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep an
> eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work beyond
> this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we use for FOP
> dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
>- 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>- 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>- 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>>- Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>- I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>> batik).
>>The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have
>> been
>>2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>>is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>>final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>> causing
>>problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>> simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> >
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
>> > modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Artifacts can be found there:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The release is signed with the key:
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>> >
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>> >
>> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>> >
>> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>> >
>> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>> >
>> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>> >
>> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>> >
>> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>> >
>> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>> >
>> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>> >
>> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>> >
>> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>> >
>> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>> >
>> > =dYHK
>> >
>> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams 
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was
> eg 1.8.
>

understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep an
eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work beyond
this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we use for FOP
dev builds after this release and up to the next release:

   - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
   - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
   - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT

what do others think?


>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
> To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>
>- Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>- I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
> batik).
>The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
>2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
> qualifier
>is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
> causing
>problems.
>
> G.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
> > modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
> >
> >
> >
> > Artifacts can be found there:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> >
> >
> >
> > The release is signed with the key:
> >
> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> > Version: GnuPG v1
> >
> >
> >
> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
> >
> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
> >
> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
> >
> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
> >
> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
> >
> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
> >
> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
> >
> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
> >
> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
> >
> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
> >
> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
> >
> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
> >
> > =dYHK
> >
> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Simon Steiner 
Hi,

I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was eg 
1.8.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com] 
Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.

   - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
   - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
   instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for batik).
   The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
   2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT" qualifier
   is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
   final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up causing
   problems.

G.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz 
> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>
>
>
> Artifacts can be found there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>
>
>
> The release is signed with the key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>
> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>
> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>
> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>
> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>
> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>
> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>
> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>
> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>
> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>
> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>
> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>
> =dYHK
>
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams 
There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.

   - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
   - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
   instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for batik).
   The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
   2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT" qualifier
   is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
   final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up causing
   problems.

G.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner 
wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>
>
>
> Artifacts can be found there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>
>
>
> The release is signed with the key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>
> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>
> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>
> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>
> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>
> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>
> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>
> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>
> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>
> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>
> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>
> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>
> =dYHK
>
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Clay Leeds 
+1

Warm regards,

Clay Leeds  -  the.webmaes...@gmail.com
"My religion is simple. My religion is kindness."
HH the Dalai Lama of Tibet

> On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:29 AM, Simon Steiner  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
> 
> 
> 
> Artifacts can be found there:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> 
> 
> 
> The release is signed with the key:
> 
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
> 
> 
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> 
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
> 
> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
> 
> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
> 
> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
> 
> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
> 
> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
> 
> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
> 
> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
> 
> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
> 
> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
> 
> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
> 
> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
> 
> =dYHK
> 
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9

2017-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams 
-1 Missing pom.xml in top level directory.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Simon Steiner 
wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9.
>
>
>
> Artifacts can be found there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>
>
>
> The release is signed with the key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will end on 27/3/2017
>
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYz6GyAAoJEFuT8d98223qVNoQAJG/Z9utERu4m7V+9l4coF0x
>
> Enwj3ZWcaGdY4+MNFpo3BjGSEhOK12t7FOz2YwHxNf+RRfiqCm5ZvxxvJmx4qmqF
>
> Appt1UjylNnZYwNi91Vt3GOi7Nytc+zEZGSAVOeYJgNe2rUtCuBLaGWee+8glXxA
>
> dkDLqHBfjiwa1akKzhbSjxqBYV3ZI0a9yLgWRfS9CWaSDkI7b8aofZRDsJVs2cK+
>
> 4xr0A/tMqeiM3Tm8Ly3cBrFpkN26f2mp3TYPG08tfdS5luFX4ZjMd9W7odyHSYgl
>
> 9n+UQAyNe/XMlKWoJQxQKZ4YJhyuM549CHQ/OLGysHybGSD+yESeenPtXakf9v1u
>
> UeileMejSQeR6IUQis4V3p+nJPRMho5a2dJ9Oe/jEPkU8Pk0Hjdjph/zdFQ0tqIV
>
> jYMCZx3OFdkqrcIngAH+5B0PqOspEy9FCXJDFnJ5pS5cy2/8JgkIA/4hCa37rpPX
>
> A3GHuH3rgWu1JJoRDZ+8qrRi4dzysPF8d/F/Zyf8+qBDdsP+Q8FhmdkGJJBzihOT
>
> sSztPYq8+XTlSuRu9Be5/u99Sa716nmGjPR94p2EEwmMYaKM+PvD00uUgW+9BK5H
>
> 3p3wN93c5qPRkSEWw8uoxv8RxpLtyOhaoTpCrwwNnAmIw0VRTaZSyaHVuzvlV1g2
>
> /ZzIFJSatlzfM9F0+SwQ
>
> =jRtu
>
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>

[VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)

2017-03-27 Thread Simon Steiner 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hash: SHA1

 

Hi,

 

This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.

 

Artifacts can be found there:

http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/

 

The release is signed with the key:

https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS

 

The vote will end on 31/3/2017

 

+1 from me.

 

Thanks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Version: GnuPG v1

 

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn

POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1

UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy

4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi

mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j

i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y

TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM

fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5

dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw

4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww

Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE

ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6

=dYHK

-END PGP SIGNATURE-

RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9

2017-03-27 Thread Simon Steiner 
Hi,

I didn't see your -1 email in my mailbox for some reason, I will take a look.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com] 
Sent: 27 March 2017 10:08
To: XML Graphics Project <general@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9

To follow up on this. There doesn't seem to be *any* pom.xml present in either 
the batik-bin-1.9.zip or batik-src-1.9.zip artifacts you posted.
Perhaps this was done in error when you built the artifacts?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:

> -1 Missing pom.xml in top level directory.
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Simon Steiner 
> <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9.
>>
>>
>>
>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>
>>
>>
>> The release is signed with the key:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>
>>
>>
>> The vote will end on 27/3/2017
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>
>>
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYz6GyAAoJEFuT8d98223qVNoQAJG/Z9utERu4m7V+9l4coF0x
>>
>> Enwj3ZWcaGdY4+MNFpo3BjGSEhOK12t7FOz2YwHxNf+RRfiqCm5ZvxxvJmx4qmqF
>>
>> Appt1UjylNnZYwNi91Vt3GOi7Nytc+zEZGSAVOeYJgNe2rUtCuBLaGWee+8glXxA
>>
>> dkDLqHBfjiwa1akKzhbSjxqBYV3ZI0a9yLgWRfS9CWaSDkI7b8aofZRDsJVs2cK+
>>
>> 4xr0A/tMqeiM3Tm8Ly3cBrFpkN26f2mp3TYPG08tfdS5luFX4ZjMd9W7odyHSYgl
>>
>> 9n+UQAyNe/XMlKWoJQxQKZ4YJhyuM549CHQ/OLGysHybGSD+yESeenPtXakf9v1u
>>
>> UeileMejSQeR6IUQis4V3p+nJPRMho5a2dJ9Oe/jEPkU8Pk0Hjdjph/zdFQ0tqIV
>>
>> jYMCZx3OFdkqrcIngAH+5B0PqOspEy9FCXJDFnJ5pS5cy2/8JgkIA/4hCa37rpPX
>>
>> A3GHuH3rgWu1JJoRDZ+8qrRi4dzysPF8d/F/Zyf8+qBDdsP+Q8FhmdkGJJBzihOT
>>
>> sSztPYq8+XTlSuRu9Be5/u99Sa716nmGjPR94p2EEwmMYaKM+PvD00uUgW+9BK5H
>>
>> 3p3wN93c5qPRkSEWw8uoxv8RxpLtyOhaoTpCrwwNnAmIw0VRTaZSyaHVuzvlV1g2
>>
>> /ZzIFJSatlzfM9F0+SwQ
>>
>> =jRtu
>>
>> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9

2017-03-27 Thread Glenn Adams 
To follow up on this. There doesn't seem to be *any* pom.xml present in
either the batik-bin-1.9.zip or batik-src-1.9.zip artifacts you posted.
Perhaps this was done in error when you built the artifacts?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Glenn Adams  wrote:

> -1 Missing pom.xml in top level directory.
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Simon Steiner  > wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9.
>>
>>
>>
>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>
>>
>>
>> The release is signed with the key:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>
>>
>>
>> The vote will end on 27/3/2017
>>
>>
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>
>>
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYz6GyAAoJEFuT8d98223qVNoQAJG/Z9utERu4m7V+9l4coF0x
>>
>> Enwj3ZWcaGdY4+MNFpo3BjGSEhOK12t7FOz2YwHxNf+RRfiqCm5ZvxxvJmx4qmqF
>>
>> Appt1UjylNnZYwNi91Vt3GOi7Nytc+zEZGSAVOeYJgNe2rUtCuBLaGWee+8glXxA
>>
>> dkDLqHBfjiwa1akKzhbSjxqBYV3ZI0a9yLgWRfS9CWaSDkI7b8aofZRDsJVs2cK+
>>
>> 4xr0A/tMqeiM3Tm8Ly3cBrFpkN26f2mp3TYPG08tfdS5luFX4ZjMd9W7odyHSYgl
>>
>> 9n+UQAyNe/XMlKWoJQxQKZ4YJhyuM549CHQ/OLGysHybGSD+yESeenPtXakf9v1u
>>
>> UeileMejSQeR6IUQis4V3p+nJPRMho5a2dJ9Oe/jEPkU8Pk0Hjdjph/zdFQ0tqIV
>>
>> jYMCZx3OFdkqrcIngAH+5B0PqOspEy9FCXJDFnJ5pS5cy2/8JgkIA/4hCa37rpPX
>>
>> A3GHuH3rgWu1JJoRDZ+8qrRi4dzysPF8d/F/Zyf8+qBDdsP+Q8FhmdkGJJBzihOT
>>
>> sSztPYq8+XTlSuRu9Be5/u99Sa716nmGjPR94p2EEwmMYaKM+PvD00uUgW+9BK5H
>>
>> 3p3wN93c5qPRkSEWw8uoxv8RxpLtyOhaoTpCrwwNnAmIw0VRTaZSyaHVuzvlV1g2
>>
>> /ZzIFJSatlzfM9F0+SwQ
>>
>> =jRtu
>>
>> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9

2017-03-21 Thread Andreas Delmelle 
+1

Cheers

Andreas

> On 20 Mar 2017, at 10:35, Simon Steiner  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9.
> 
> 
> 
> Artifacts can be found there:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> 
> 
> 
> The release is signed with the key:
> 
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will end on 27/3/2017
> 
> 
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> 
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYz6GyAAoJEFuT8d98223qVNoQAJG/Z9utERu4m7V+9l4coF0x
> 
> Enwj3ZWcaGdY4+MNFpo3BjGSEhOK12t7FOz2YwHxNf+RRfiqCm5ZvxxvJmx4qmqF
> 
> Appt1UjylNnZYwNi91Vt3GOi7Nytc+zEZGSAVOeYJgNe2rUtCuBLaGWee+8glXxA
> 
> dkDLqHBfjiwa1akKzhbSjxqBYV3ZI0a9yLgWRfS9CWaSDkI7b8aofZRDsJVs2cK+
> 
> 4xr0A/tMqeiM3Tm8Ly3cBrFpkN26f2mp3TYPG08tfdS5luFX4ZjMd9W7odyHSYgl
> 
> 9n+UQAyNe/XMlKWoJQxQKZ4YJhyuM549CHQ/OLGysHybGSD+yESeenPtXakf9v1u
> 
> UeileMejSQeR6IUQis4V3p+nJPRMho5a2dJ9Oe/jEPkU8Pk0Hjdjph/zdFQ0tqIV
> 
> jYMCZx3OFdkqrcIngAH+5B0PqOspEy9FCXJDFnJ5pS5cy2/8JgkIA/4hCa37rpPX
> 
> A3GHuH3rgWu1JJoRDZ+8qrRi4dzysPF8d/F/Zyf8+qBDdsP+Q8FhmdkGJJBzihOT
> 
> sSztPYq8+XTlSuRu9Be5/u99Sa716nmGjPR94p2EEwmMYaKM+PvD00uUgW+9BK5H
> 
> 3p3wN93c5qPRkSEWw8uoxv8RxpLtyOhaoTpCrwwNnAmIw0VRTaZSyaHVuzvlV1g2
> 
> /ZzIFJSatlzfM9F0+SwQ
> 
> =jRtu
> 
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9

2017-03-20 Thread Clay Leeds 
+1 from me

Ÿ Clay Leeds
@ the.webmaes...@gmail.com

Sent from my iThing

> On Mar 20, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Simon Steiner  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9.
> 
> 
> 
> Artifacts can be found there:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> 
> 
> 
> The release is signed with the key:
> 
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will end on 27/3/2017
> 
> 
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> 
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYz6GyAAoJEFuT8d98223qVNoQAJG/Z9utERu4m7V+9l4coF0x
> 
> Enwj3ZWcaGdY4+MNFpo3BjGSEhOK12t7FOz2YwHxNf+RRfiqCm5ZvxxvJmx4qmqF
> 
> Appt1UjylNnZYwNi91Vt3GOi7Nytc+zEZGSAVOeYJgNe2rUtCuBLaGWee+8glXxA
> 
> dkDLqHBfjiwa1akKzhbSjxqBYV3ZI0a9yLgWRfS9CWaSDkI7b8aofZRDsJVs2cK+
> 
> 4xr0A/tMqeiM3Tm8Ly3cBrFpkN26f2mp3TYPG08tfdS5luFX4ZjMd9W7odyHSYgl
> 
> 9n+UQAyNe/XMlKWoJQxQKZ4YJhyuM549CHQ/OLGysHybGSD+yESeenPtXakf9v1u
> 
> UeileMejSQeR6IUQis4V3p+nJPRMho5a2dJ9Oe/jEPkU8Pk0Hjdjph/zdFQ0tqIV
> 
> jYMCZx3OFdkqrcIngAH+5B0PqOspEy9FCXJDFnJ5pS5cy2/8JgkIA/4hCa37rpPX
> 
> A3GHuH3rgWu1JJoRDZ+8qrRi4dzysPF8d/F/Zyf8+qBDdsP+Q8FhmdkGJJBzihOT
> 
> sSztPYq8+XTlSuRu9Be5/u99Sa716nmGjPR94p2EEwmMYaKM+PvD00uUgW+9BK5H
> 
> 3p3wN93c5qPRkSEWw8uoxv8RxpLtyOhaoTpCrwwNnAmIw0VRTaZSyaHVuzvlV1g2
> 
> /ZzIFJSatlzfM9F0+SwQ
> 
> =jRtu
> 
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org

[VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9

2017-03-20 Thread Simon Steiner 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hash: SHA1

 

Hi,

 

This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9.

 

Artifacts can be found there:

http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/

 

The release is signed with the key:

https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS

 

The vote will end on 27/3/2017

 

+1 from me.

 

Thanks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Version: GnuPG v1

 

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYz6GyAAoJEFuT8d98223qVNoQAJG/Z9utERu4m7V+9l4coF0x

Enwj3ZWcaGdY4+MNFpo3BjGSEhOK12t7FOz2YwHxNf+RRfiqCm5ZvxxvJmx4qmqF

Appt1UjylNnZYwNi91Vt3GOi7Nytc+zEZGSAVOeYJgNe2rUtCuBLaGWee+8glXxA

dkDLqHBfjiwa1akKzhbSjxqBYV3ZI0a9yLgWRfS9CWaSDkI7b8aofZRDsJVs2cK+

4xr0A/tMqeiM3Tm8Ly3cBrFpkN26f2mp3TYPG08tfdS5luFX4ZjMd9W7odyHSYgl

9n+UQAyNe/XMlKWoJQxQKZ4YJhyuM549CHQ/OLGysHybGSD+yESeenPtXakf9v1u

UeileMejSQeR6IUQis4V3p+nJPRMho5a2dJ9Oe/jEPkU8Pk0Hjdjph/zdFQ0tqIV

jYMCZx3OFdkqrcIngAH+5B0PqOspEy9FCXJDFnJ5pS5cy2/8JgkIA/4hCa37rpPX

A3GHuH3rgWu1JJoRDZ+8qrRi4dzysPF8d/F/Zyf8+qBDdsP+Q8FhmdkGJJBzihOT

sSztPYq8+XTlSuRu9Be5/u99Sa716nmGjPR94p2EEwmMYaKM+PvD00uUgW+9BK5H

3p3wN93c5qPRkSEWw8uoxv8RxpLtyOhaoTpCrwwNnAmIw0VRTaZSyaHVuzvlV1g2

/ZzIFJSatlzfM9F0+SwQ

=jRtu

-END PGP SIGNATURE-