On 15:26 Mon 12 Jan , Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi all,
>I have a few packages listed in /var/lib/portage/world that I was
> wondering whether they needed to be in there? Thanks in advance,
>
> 1) Emulation stuff
>
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
>
>
Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm curious. I have mplayer installed but amd64codecs is not. What use
flag turns that on?
It's not needed anymore. mplayer supports those codecs now natively as
of 1.0_rc2_p28288.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Paul Hartman
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Thanks
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Paul Hartman
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks guys. I understand how portage works and what to do to clean
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> Thanks guys. I understand how portage works and what to do to clean
>>> things up. That part isn't an issue this time around.
>>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Thanks guys. I understand how portage works and what to do to clean
>> things up. That part isn't an issue this time around.
>>
>> I'm more trying to understand whether this is just left
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Thanks guys. I understand how portage works and what to do to clean
> things up. That part isn't an issue this time around.
>
> I'm more trying to understand whether this is just left over from old
> installs and hasn't gotten cleaned up along
Thanks guys. I understand how portage works and what to do to clean
things up. That part isn't an issue this time around.
I'm more trying to understand whether this is just left over from old
installs and hasn't gotten cleaned up along the way. I had about 6
emul-linux packages. The all were depen
Christoph Mende писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 13 Jan
2009 04:33:30 +0500:
then, remove app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java and
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs from world file and run emerge -C
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs or
depclean.
On Tue
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:29:26 +0500
Verm wrote:
> Mark Knecht писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 13 Jan
> 2009 04:26:29 +0500:
>
> > Hi all,
> >I have a few packages listed in /var/lib/portage/world that I was
> > wondering whether they needed to be in there? Thanks in advance,
> >
> > 1) Emulat
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a few packages listed in /var/lib/portage/world that I was
> wondering whether they needed to be in there? Thanks in advance,
>
> 1) Emulation stuff
>
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
Mark Knecht писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 13 Jan
2009 04:26:29 +0500:
Hi all,
I have a few packages listed in /var/lib/portage/world that I was
wondering whether they needed to be in there? Thanks in advance,
1) Emulation stuff
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java
app-emulation/emul-linux-x8
Hi all,
I have a few packages listed in /var/lib/portage/world that I was
wondering whether they needed to be in there? Thanks in advance,
1) Emulation stuff
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
Nothing seems to depend on them. Can I remove them?
lightning ~
2009/1/12 Nadav Horesh :
> It is a desktop. I do not know how netplugd poped in, I do not see it in
> rc-update -s.
> Is this may my the source of my problem?
>
maybe it's a dep of some other service.
> -הודעה מקורית-
> מאת: Sebastian Redl [mailto:sebastian.r...@getdesigned.at]
> נשלח: ב
It is a desktop. I do not know how netplugd poped in, I do not see it in
rc-update -s.
Is this may my the source of my problem?
Nadav.
-הודעה מקורית-
מאת: Sebastian Redl [mailto:sebastian.r...@getdesigned.at]
נשלח: ב 12-ינואר-09 17:24
אל: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
נושא: Re: [gento
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:27:31 +0200, Nadav Horesh
wrote:
> The file /etc/conf.d/net is basically empty (only comments)
>
>>>From /var/log/messages:
>
> Jan 12 14:07:54 nadav :00:19.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1)
> 00:16:76:b9:00:76
> Jan 12 14:07:54 nadav :00:19.0: eth0: Intel(
Nadav Horesh писал(а) в своём письме Mon, 12 Jan
2009 18:27:06 +0500:
Hm..
Run make menuconfig in /usr/src/linux and make print screen of Networking
support -> Networking options.
No help. I tried to remove ipv6, but it is not an option in 2.27-r7 (it
can be either a module or build-in
No help. I tried to remove ipv6, but it is not an option in 2.27-r7 (it can be
either a module or build-in). lsmod shows that ipv6 is loaded. I see no sign
for ipv4 module with lsmod, but I assume that if there was not ipv4 protocol I
could not bring dhcp up manually. Is it possible that the in
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 02:27:31PM +0200, Nadav Horesh wrote:
>The file /etc/conf.d/net is basically empty (only comments)
Find the line config_eth0= and try this :
config_eth0=( "dhcp" )
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 02:22:48PM +0200, Nadav Horesh wrote:
>This could be the point: The local network has only IPv4. What should I
>do?
Check your linux configuration file, see if IPv4 is built-in or as
module. In case you have the module built, check if it's loaded (lsmod).
Check y
The file /etc/conf.d/net is basically empty (only comments)
>From /var/log/messages:
Jan 12 14:07:54 nadav :00:19.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x1)
00:16:76:b9:00:76
Jan 12 14:07:54 nadav :00:19.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network
Connection
Jan 12 14:07:54 nadav :00:19.0: eth0:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:10:37AM +0100, Sebastian Redl wrote:
> > I think that the net.eth0 service start properly:
> >
> > nadav nadav # ifconfig
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:76:b9:00:76
> > inet6 addr: fe80::216:76ff:feb9:76/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROA
This could be the point: The local network has only IPv4. What should I
do?
Nadav.
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 11:10 +0100, Sebastian Redl wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:35:47 +0200, Nadav Horesh
> wrote:
> > I think that the net.eth0 service start properly:
> >
> > nadav nadav # ifconfig
> > et
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:35:47 +0200, Nadav Horesh
wrote:
> I think that the net.eth0 service start properly:
>
> nadav nadav # ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:76:b9:00:76
> inet6 addr: fe80::216:76ff:feb9:76/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTIC
Show your /etc/conf.d/net and cat /var/log/messages | grep eth0
Nadav Horesh писал(а) в своём письме Mon, 12 Jan
2009 16:35:47 +0500:
I think that the net.eth0 service start properly:
nadav nadav # ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:76:b9:00:76
inet6 addr: fe80:
I think that the net.eth0 service start properly:
nadav nadav # ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:76:b9:00:76
inet6 addr: fe80::216:76ff:feb9:76/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:3103228 errors:0 dropped:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:57:51AM +0200, Nadav Horesh wrote:
> After login I have to start the dhcp and smb services manualy and directly
>
> nadav nadav # dhcpcd eth0
> nadav nadav # smbd start
> nadav nadav # nmbd start
>
> When I try to run manually the init.d scripts I get a strange result
27 matches
Mail list logo
