Re: [gentoo-amd64] Big white splotch on web page

2007-05-02 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone else get a big white splotch across the stop of this web page like I do? Using Firefox-bin-2.0.0.3 and netscape-flash-9.0.31.0. I'm assuming this is a Flash problem. I don't see it on my Windows box.. On your Windows box you use

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Anyone using i965 3D?

2007-04-06 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Jack Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wanted to ping the list to see if anyone using i965 embedded graphics was having any luck with 3d/DRI? Regardless of the driver, it seems that hardware 3d is completely non-functional on this chip under Linux. I've seen other people complain

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Anyone using i965 3D?

2007-04-06 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Jack Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wanted to ping the list to see if anyone using i965 embedded graphics was having any luck with 3d/DRI? Regardless of the driver, it seems that hardware 3d is completely non-functional on this chip under Linux. I've seen other people complain

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is Xorg server built in static form?

2007-03-05 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps you don't have the start of this thread. This is how it looks here and that's the reason I asked the question: Section Module Load extmod SubSection extmod Option omit xfree86-dga

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: MAKEOPTS values for Athlon 64 X2

2007-01-16 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Thomas Rösner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw, may I come to your place when UT2007 is out? ;-) Unless it will be released under a free license I doubt Duncan will let you run it on his computer :-p

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is Xorg server built in static form?

2007-01-15 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Option omit xfree86-dga Let me rephrase the question: I want to load all extensions provided by extmod, all but xfree86-dga. How should I do this? Did you try using the exact cases as in the man page? There is says XFree86-DGA not

Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2.6.18 kernel

2006-11-01 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it just me or is the .18 kernel slow in getting unmasked? I don't recall any other releases taking as long to be marked stable, but then I haven't been quite as anxious to test a new kernel as I have been for .18. I'm sure people are running

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Anybody else having problems with audio/vidio apps and glibc-2.5?

2006-10-24 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you mentioned, the latest kernel didn't want to boot, so there again I backed up a couple notches and got a working one, but everything else I had merged since then, notably including all of KDE 3.5.5, merged against glibc-2.5, seems to be working

RE: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How To Play WMV (thread drift - slaveryware)

2006-09-30 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Bob Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a very shallow definition of the essence of freedom, from the perspective of most end users, your scenario doesn't really change anything. From the end users perspective s/he is still dependent on someone else to make the changes. I wouldn't say

Re: [gentoo-amd64] PDF Editor

2006-09-26 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, Can anyone recommend an application to edit a pdf file, and of course works on 64 bit Gentoo? Well, KWord (part of the KOffice suite) has the ability to import PDF files, but it doesn't work very well. You can give it a try and maybe

Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1

2006-08-31 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Bráulio Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thank you for you comments... could you please explain me more about what is ISA? Well, in this context, ISA means Instruction Set Architecture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instruction_set). The ISA defines all the instructions that a CPU needs to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1

2006-08-31 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:40, Andrei Slavoiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote First, -mtune is implied when you use -march, for any architecture. Yeah, but -march might be filtered by the ebuild and -mtune not; I like using both

Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1

2006-08-30 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Bráulio Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -mtune=athlon64 -march=athlon64 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -m3dnow Somebody else already pointed out that gcc 4.1.1 will soon go stable on all architectures, but I have some comments on your compiler flags. First, -mtune is implied when you

Re: [gentoo-amd64] About xgl (was About gcc 4.1.1)

2006-08-30 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Martin Ostrica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cool, finally is there any plan to put xgl stable soon? ;) Now this is a completely different issue. There isn't even a release of xgl, so no chance to be added to portage any time soon, let alone be marked stable. ;)

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: accelerated X 7.1 ATI card

2006-08-21 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Piotr Pruszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By the way - do you have DRM working ?? Yes I have. I use the DRM drivers in kernel 2.6.17, not the separate ebuild which is recommended in the HOWTO because it works and it's easier to update if it's in kernel. Unfortunately, doing everything

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: accelerated X 7.1 ATI card

2006-08-21 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... I /thought/ it was there, but the manpage said no... [snip] Maybe the manpage is wrong? I know it had /some/ updates for 6.6.1, as the options tweaked a bit. Maybe they updated the options but forgot to upgrade the supported hardware status?

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: accelerated X 7.1 ATI card

2006-08-20 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:03:51 +0200: Duncan - where is masked xorg 7.2 ?? I do not see it in my /usr/portage/profiles ?? As best I know, what happened is that xorg-7.2 is very similar to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Jahshaka

2006-08-15 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Andrei Slavoiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, it helps if you place LC_ALL=C before the command so that the error messages are in english. (Ex. `LC_ALL=C emerge jahshaka`) I just realized my choice of words was not the best. What I meant with the above is that it would help us, the english

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE is dead...

2006-08-15 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Peter Davoust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so I've been hibernate-ram-ing my computer recently, and it got to the point where /tmp was full. I thought it was time for a restart, and I did shutdown -r now, and when I rebooted, logged into kdm, I was taken right back to kdm. I tried it a

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Jahshaka

2006-08-15 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Peter Davoust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two questions: will that compile jahshaka in english? No, portage will respect your LINGUAS settings as usual. And besides, when you need to compile it with LC_ALL=C so that you can post the error message here you allready know it will fail to compile

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Jahshaka

2006-08-15 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Luigi Pinna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alle 10:53, martedì 15 agosto 2006, Andrei Slavoiu ha scritto: From my very basic knowledge of german I believe you are using gcc-4 and this package is not yet ready for this. Try with gcc-3

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problem emerging x11-drm

2006-07-27 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Rafael Barrera Oro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Determining the location of the kernel source code * Found kernel source directory: * /usr/src/linux * Found sources for kernel version: * 2.6.16-gentoo-r13 * Please verify that your /usr/src/linux symlink is pointing * to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] amd64, gcc-4.1.1 kde-3.5

2006-06-02 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to compile KDE 3.5 with gcc-4.1.1 on my amd64 computer. KDE_multimedia can't link with the following error : /usr/kde/3.5/lib64/libkhtml.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [juk]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Xorg issue now after update!

2006-05-14 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
#Option ReverseDDC# [bool] #Option LVDSProbePLL # [bool] #Option AccelMethod # str Identifier Card0 Driver ati It's better to specify directly radeon as the driver. Using ati will result in loading

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Sguil on AMD64

2006-02-18 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Clemente Aguiar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope I don't have to start all over again and turn that machine an x86 ... Definetly not. Worst case scenario is that you will have to create a 32bit chroot for it http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1chap=2 However you

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Fragmentation

2006-02-17 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't mind using whatever tools are available for the initial partitioning scheme, but this box gets treated pretty much as a development machine would, with partitions moving up and down and being copied between disks far more often than lots

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Installing ATI Radeon 7000 driver

2006-01-29 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
--- Clemente Aguiar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The machine has a - ATI Radeon 7000 - RV100 Video controller. I installed the ati-drivers but get lots of undefined symbols. The ati drivers work only for radeon 8500 and newer. For your card use the x11 driver. As for the resolution problem try to