On Thursday 14 September 2006 20:08, Duncan wrote:
Here's my CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS:
...etc.
Which model of Opteron are your CPUs? I have a feeling they differ from my
246s, and I've been wondering how I ought to tune your helpfully explained
flags to suit my box.
--
Rgds
Peter
--
Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 23 Sep
2006 14:39:11 +:
Which model of Opteron are your CPUs? I have a feeling they differ from my
246s, and I've been wondering how I ought to tune your helpfully explained
flags to suit my box.
I'm
On Saturday 23 September 2006 16:21, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Nope. SSE and SSE2, but not SSE3. According to /proc/cpuinfo, that is.
The flag in cpuinfo is pni for Prescott New Instructions.
Cheers,
Jason
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 23 September 2006 17:21, Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop
interactivity anyone?':
On Saturday 23 September 2006 19:52, Duncan wrote:
However, the only difference (CFLAGS wise) that I'm aware of for the
AMD dual
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:43:19 -0700:
Now, you are very adept at this. You're explanations make sense to
the level I've considered them. (Not very far right now...) Main
questions:
Adept, perhaps, but don't take my
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:06:47 -0700:
On 9/14/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm just curious whether anyone besides me is noticing their
machine feeling somewhat sluggish since doing the gcc-4.1 upgrade?
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:15:42 -0700:
I'm just curious whether anyone besides me is noticing their machine
feeling somewhat sluggish since doing the gcc-4.1 upgrade? Mine seems ot
be using a lot of memory. Alt-tabbing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Hmm - no -ftree-vectorize? Care to comment on that? I hear that it can
be buggy with a few packages, but I'm guessing it is worth having in
there in general.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
On 9/14/06, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:15:42 -0700:
I'm just curious whether anyone besides me is noticing their machine
feeling somewhat sluggish since doing the gcc-4.1 upgrade? Mine seems
