On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:48:11 +0300, Michel Merinoff wrote:
> > No, there's no way to make a pure binary driver that works on all
> > systems, because symbols in the kernel will be at different locations
> > depending on options it was compiled with.
> Should this mean, that you have to recompile
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 09:59, Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel recompile?':
>
>> I think gcc version should not have impact on X because NVidia's drivers
>> are binary, clo
sean wrote:
> Daniel Iliev wrote:
>> sean wrote:
>>> Here is where things stand.
>>>
>>> On boot, dmesg showed the modules did not load.
>>
>> Did you replace the old "System.map" file with the new one?
>> "cp /usr/src/linux/System.map /boot/System.map"
>> or
>> "/usr/src/linux/System.map /System.m
Daniel Iliev wrote:
sean wrote:
Here is where things stand.
On boot, dmesg showed the modules did not load.
Did you replace the old "System.map" file with the new one?
"cp /usr/src/linux/System.map /boot/System.map"
or
"/usr/src/linux/System.map /System.map"
Well your recommendations did t
Dnia środa, 1 listopada 2006 17:55, Florian D. napisał:
> ok, sorry for being off-topic, but what is the default installation
> target for 'make install'? /boot/vmlinuz? and is there a
> backup-function, say, that my last /boot/vmlinuz gets automatically
> moved to /boot/vmlinuz.old or something?
El Miércoles, 1 de Noviembre de 2006 17:55, Florian D. escribió:
> Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
> > So manual config, automatic install
> > is my way.
>
> ok, sorry for being off-topic, but what is the default installation
> target for 'make install'? /boot/vmlinuz? and is there a
> backup-function, say
Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
So manual config, automatic install
is my way.
ok, sorry for being off-topic, but what is the default installation
target for 'make install'? /boot/vmlinuz? and is there a
backup-function, say, that my last /boot/vmlinuz gets automatically
moved to /boot/vmlinuz.old or
Dnia środa, 1 listopada 2006 13:47, Daniel Iliev napisał:
> Pawel, I didn't say something's wrong with "make install".
>
> *Nothing's wrong with "make install".*
Please, why did you take this so personal? I didn't mean to criticize you by
any means!
> I just prefer to do it manually. Since I'm
Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 31 października 2006 19:39, Daniel Iliev napisał:
>
>
>> It seems correct to me. Now you have to install the kernel image.
>> Now the kernel image is compiled and can be found in
>> /usr/src/linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage
>> (replace x86_64 with your arch.
Dnia wtorek, 31 października 2006 19:39, Daniel Iliev napisał:
> It seems correct to me. Now you have to install the kernel image.
> Now the kernel image is compiled and can be found in
> /usr/src/linux/arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage
> (replace x86_64 with your arch. This is the gentoo-amd64 list, there
sean wrote:
> Here is where things stand.
>
> On boot, dmesg showed the modules did not load.
Did you replace the old "System.map" file with the new one?
"cp /usr/src/linux/System.map /boot/System.map"
or
"/usr/src/linux/System.map /System.map"
I think this will stop the warnings.
>
> Here is my
Daniel Iliev wrote:
Sean wrote:
With the line the way it was ending, I thought that it was some sort
of error.
I do not recall seeing such a line in the past when I built the kernel
for my system, which is an amd64 SMP box.
I used the min install CD and followed the Gentoo docs using the
manual
Sean wrote:
>
> With the line the way it was ending, I thought that it was some sort
> of error.
> I do not recall seeing such a line in the past when I built the kernel
> for my system, which is an amd64 SMP box.
>
> I used the min install CD and followed the Gentoo docs using the
> manual install
Daniel Iliev wrote:
Sean wrote:
it always displays the line
if [ -r System.map -a -x /sbin/depmod ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F
System.map 2.6.16-gentoo-r9; fi
then just a prompt display.
It seems correct to me. Now you have to install the kernel image.
Now the kernel image is compiled and can
Sean wrote:
>
> Well from your email and Mathieu it has helped a bit. I have tried to
> rebuild the kernel several times and after the line
>
> INSTALL sound/soundcore.ko
>
> it always displays the line
> if [ -r System.map -a -x /sbin/depmod ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F
> System.map 2.6.16-gentoo-r
Sean wrote:
> Daniel Iliev wrote:
>> Sean wrote:
>>> Since my gcc upgrade all my modules fail on boot with an error of
>>> version magic '2.6.16-gentoo-r9 SMP gcc-4.1' should be
>>> '2.6.16.16-gentoo-r9 SMP gcc-3.4'
>>>
>>> However when I try to start the rebuild of my kernel it stops just
>>> afte
Daniel Iliev wrote:
Sean wrote:
Since my gcc upgrade all my modules fail on boot with an error of
version magic '2.6.16-gentoo-r9 SMP gcc-4.1' should be
'2.6.16.16-gentoo-r9 SMP gcc-3.4'
However when I try to start the rebuild of my kernel it stops just
after starting with the line
'if [ -r Sy
Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 31 października 2006 16:59, Daniel Iliev napisał:
>
>
>> My X is just fine. It is Mr. Sean who has hard time with the X.
>> I think gcc version should not have impact on X because NVidia's drivers
>> are binary, closed source - they don't care about the gcc
Sean wrote:
>
> Since my gcc upgrade all my modules fail on boot with an error of
> version magic '2.6.16-gentoo-r9 SMP gcc-4.1' should be
> '2.6.16.16-gentoo-r9 SMP gcc-3.4'
>
> However when I try to start the rebuild of my kernel it stops just
> after starting with the line
>
> 'if [ -r System.ma
Dnia wtorek, 31 października 2006 16:59, Daniel Iliev napisał:
> My X is just fine. It is Mr. Sean who has hard time with the X.
> I think gcc version should not have impact on X because NVidia's drivers
> are binary, closed source - they don't care about the gcc used to
> compile the kernel or th
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 09:59, Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel recompile?':
> I think gcc version should not have impact on X because NVidia's drivers
> are binary, closed source - they don't care about the gcc used
Piotr Pruszczak wrote:
> Daniel Iliev napisał(a):
>> Piotr Pruszczak wrote:
>>> Sean napisał(a):
I asked in another message due to an X problem I am now having, but I
also thought this question deserved a post of its own.
With my recent upgrade of gcc to 4, does the kernel need
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:04, Sean wrote:
> Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
> > No. In this case you'd need new NVidia kernel driver each time kernel's
> > version changes.
> >
> > During installation NVidia's kernel module (in compiler's meaning - .o
> > file provided by NVidia) is linked against a fr
Daniel Iliev napisał(a):
Piotr Pruszczak wrote:
Sean napisał(a):
I asked in another message due to an X problem I am now having, but I
also thought this question deserved a post of its own.
With my recent upgrade of gcc to 4, does the kernel need to be
recompiled?
YES !!!
- Why !?
modules
Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
No. In this case you'd need new NVidia kernel driver each time kernel's
version changes.
During installation NVidia's kernel module (in compiler's meaning - .o file
provided by NVidia) is linked against a freshly compiled stub adopting it to
running kernel and making
I asked in another message due to an X problem I am now having, but I
also thought this question deserved a post of its own.
With my recent upgrade of gcc to 4, does the kernel need to be recompiled?
When should a kernel be rebuilt?
Thanks
Piotr Pruszczak wrote:
> Sean napisał(a):
>> I asked in another message due to an X problem I am now having, but I
>> also thought this question deserved a post of its own.
>>
>> With my recent upgrade of gcc to 4, does the kernel need to be
>> recompiled?
>
> YES !!!
>
- Why !?
--
Best regards,
Sean wrote:
> With my recent upgrade of gcc to 4, does the kernel need to be
> recompiled?
Not necessarily. I've been running a gcc3-compiled kernel for some weeks
now with a gcc4-compiled system. (Can't seem to get around to upgrading
the kernel.)
However, external modules, if compiled with gcc4,
Sean napisał(a):
I asked in another message due to an X problem I am now having, but I
also thought this question deserved a post of its own.
With my recent upgrade of gcc to 4, does the kernel need to be recompiled?
YES !!!
When should a kernel be rebuilt?
each timeyou change GCC version
29 matches
Mail list logo
