Re: [gentoo-amd64] Firefox and 32bit

2005-05-16 Thread Simon Stelling
Hi, Luigi Pinna wrote: Don't use the -m32 CFLAGS, instead, emerge the binary package. Ok, I emerged firefox-bin. But why cannot I compile as a 32bit program? You can compile it, but not with portage. It would mess up your DEPENDs and we really don't want that, do we? To compile it 32bit, you

Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc-4.0.1-beta20050514 emerges glibc-2.3.5.20050421, now

2005-05-16 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Sunday 15 May 2005 15:33, Duncan wrote: BTW, haven't done any hard number comparisons, but I do run a memory monitor sysguard applet in kicker, and if I'm not mistaken, the system with the new glibc seems to be taking ~50MB less memory, also, perhaps 75MB less. Note that the glibc ebuild

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Installing LILO in place of GRUB on amd64?

2005-05-16 Thread Duncan
Duncan posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 16 May 2005 01:52:33 -0700: Olivier CrĂȘte posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 May 2005 22:16:09 -0400: I added a patch for bin86... So you should be able to build/install lilo now (it works here at least). BTW,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Firefox and 32bit

2005-05-16 Thread John Myers
On Sunday 15 May 2005 21:36, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: Actually, how was the binary version of the openoffice compiled ? It was compiled on an x86 machine. pgpSX73nJqnY5.pgp Description: PGP signature