commit: a18d11eb0bc22fc17be5206f597338193e44e027 Author: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999 <AT> gmail <DOT> com> AuthorDate: Mon Jan 8 08:34:20 2024 +0000 Commit: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999 <AT> gmail <DOT> com> CommitDate: Mon Jan 8 08:34:20 2024 +0000 URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/proj/guru.git/commit/?id=a18d11eb
sys-fs/dwarfs, sys-fs/dwarfs-bin: Add myself as maintainer Per https://github.com/mhx/dwarfs/issues/184#issuecomment-1880488381 Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999 <AT> gmail.com> sys-fs/dwarfs-bin/metadata.xml | 4 ++++ sys-fs/dwarfs/metadata.xml | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/sys-fs/dwarfs-bin/metadata.xml b/sys-fs/dwarfs-bin/metadata.xml index 9a552c3d3b..b3521a7f9e 100644 --- a/sys-fs/dwarfs-bin/metadata.xml +++ b/sys-fs/dwarfs-bin/metadata.xml @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ <email>denis7...@gmail.com</email> <name>Denis Reva</name> </maintainer> + <maintainer type="person"> + <email>zhuyifei1...@gmail.com</email> + <name>YiFei Zhu</name> + </maintainer> <longdescription lang="en"> DwarFS is a read-only file system with a focus on achieving very high compression ratios in particular for very redundant data. This probably doesn't sound very exciting, because if it's redundant, it should compress well. However, I found that other read-only, compressed file systems don't do a very good job at making use of this redundancy. See here for a comparison with other compressed file systems. diff --git a/sys-fs/dwarfs/metadata.xml b/sys-fs/dwarfs/metadata.xml index 7fa35c4554..38be78d248 100644 --- a/sys-fs/dwarfs/metadata.xml +++ b/sys-fs/dwarfs/metadata.xml @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ <name>Denis Reva</name> <description>rarogcmex</description> </maintainer> + <maintainer type="person"> + <email>zhuyifei1...@gmail.com</email> + <name>YiFei Zhu</name> + </maintainer> <longdescription lang="en"> DwarFS is a read-only file system with a focus on achieving very high compression ratios in particular for very redundant data. This probably doesn't sound very exciting, because if it's redundant, it should compress well. However, I found that other read-only, compressed file systems don't do a very good job at making use of this redundancy. See here for a comparison with other compressed file systems.
