[gentoo-dev] New Category Proposal: dev-eclipse

2005-05-13 Thread Saleem A.
Hey folks. The Eclipse project has really matured and the number of ebuilds from this project are slowly and steadily growing. It seems to make sense to have a category for the ebuilds corresponding to this project. In the tree, currently, the following packages would fall under this new categor

[gentoo-dev] Web application data

2005-05-13 Thread david stanek
It seems that many web applications have a need to store data, logs, etc. I have been using a directory scheme I thought others on this mailing list may be interested in. Because of my need to keep things neat, clean and separate I do not like having this dynamic data in the same web directory that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subversion and Apache 2.0.54

2005-05-13 Thread Ian Brandt
Paul de Vrieze wrote: > Quite likely you changed db versions along the run. While this > theoretically should work. The best course of action is to dump the > repository. Make sure you have a consistent use of db, and load the > repository. Alternatively you could try to use fs_fs Eventually I wa

Re: [gentoo-dev] get_number_of_jobs

2005-05-13 Thread Daniel Goller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: | On Thursday 12 May 2005 02:40 pm, Rafael EspĂ­ndola wrote: | |>Why does get_number_of_jobs | | | it's an old hack that should be punted ... it's only used by glibc/gcc now, i | just havent gotten around to removing it will be grea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subversion and Apache 2.0.54

2005-05-13 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Sunday 08 May 2005 19:09, Ian Brandt wrote: > I realized I had added: > >=dev-libs/apr-0.9.6 > >=dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.6 > > to /etc/portage/package.keywords, and that is why apr-1.1.1 and > apr-1.1.2 were installed, and not because they were required by > apache-2.0.54. I changed >= to ~ on th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subversion and Apache 2.0.54

2005-05-13 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Saturday 07 May 2005 20:44, Ian Brandt wrote: > I suppose this is effectively to Paul: > > Have you had a chance to try Subversion with Apache 2.0.54? I'm > getting the following error after emerging apache-2.0.54 (along with > apr-1.1.1 and apr-1.1.2), and re-emerging subversion-1.1.4: > > [no

Re: [gentoo-dev] ATTN: fonts herd maintainers

2005-05-13 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Sunday 08 May 2005 11:19, Aaron Walker wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > You are incorrectly reading it. This is why the > > tag exists, so we don't need to duplicate the same information in 500 > > places. > > Yeah tove informed me of this on irc. > > Actually, herdstat was incorrectly readi

Re: [gentoo-dev] encode useflag

2005-05-13 Thread Luca Barbato
Gregorio Guidi wrote: > > ...toolame doesn't seem to do mp3s, so it doesn't overlap with lame. > (and btw it seems a dead project since two years, who would want it ;) > looks like there is yet another fork called twolame[1] that is mantained. lu [1]http://twolame.sf.net -- Luca Barbato G