Sven Vermeulen posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:28:49 +0200:
In the mail [Daniel Robbins] states that we can republish his articles
on Gentoo as long as we put the following note in each document:
The original version of this article was first published on
On Saturday 11 June 2005 17:15, foser wrote:
Anyway, my feud is with the inconsistency within packages and how it got
introduced, not with whatever order is preferred by some. Now tell me
how this happened again?
By lack of policy?
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgp16vjho2Xm4.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 17:28 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
By lack of policy?
Well I'm sort of concerned by the fact that I have to state the obvious,
but really by people reordering them for no reason.
It's not the lack of policy that is the problem here, it's the use of
some self defined not
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 10:15:22AM +0200, foser wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 12:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
you'd
know that scattered KEYWORDS is a pita to deal with ... i've seen cases
where
a specific arch was duplicated in KEYWORDS; once near the beginning and
once
near
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for changing the thread topic; I don't have the original on this
system. This time I am addressing 6.8.2-r2 as you asked, not .99.x as I
wanted you to have asked. :)
You asked for patches. Both of these are incorporated in the 6.8.99
I think the actual idea of what Gentoo does is much larger than people tend to
realize it. When Linux first came out, it was a hacker's choice and has now
expanded into something much greater than Linus himself I think had ever
anticipated.
Now, when this whole idea of distributions came to
On 6/11/05, foser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 17:28 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
By lack of policy?
Well I'm sort of concerned by the fact that I have to state the obvious,
but really by people reordering them for no reason.
It's not the lack of policy that is the
On Saturday 11 June 2005 17:21, Joshua Baergen wrote:
I don't
care what order they're in. It's not like there are 100 keywords or
something,
Wait until ppc-od, x86-fbsd and amd64-fbsd keywords make their way into the
tree... the problem there is worst, and the alphabetical order is really
Georgi Georgiev wrote: [Fri Jun 10 2005, 08:04:25PM EDT]
maillog: 10/06/2005-13:19:30(-0400): Aron Griffis types
Btw, here's an interesting statistic which really doesn't add to (or
detract from, I hope) this discussion...
grep -hr --include=\*.ebuild '^KEYWORDS=' /usr/portage | perl
On 6/11/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 11 June 2005 17:21, Joshua Baergen wrote:
I don't
care what order they're in. It's not like there are 100 keywords or
something,
Wait until ppc-od, x86-fbsd and amd64-fbsd keywords make their way into the
tree...
foser wrote:[Sat Jun 11 2005, 04:15:22AM EDT]
Arch keywords are concepts and as such may not primarily be dealt as
a an alphabetical list but as words in a sentence, there is no abc
order in sentences.
Foser, no offense intended, but you started out in this thread making
a couple good
Stuart Longland wrote:
This sounds great. And yes, I'd like to participate. I have but one
question though...
My question is this: Which web-blog script would you recommend for the
p.g.o site?
I use wordpress for my own weblog, and I like it. Not overly complicated and
does the job well
Hi,
I've installed kde-meta 3.4.0 and I just did an emerge -p kde-meta, and
it wants to install 252 ebuilds. If I do an emerge -up kde-meta, it
wants to install 331 ebuilds.
In the discussion about kde split ebuilds, it was promised that the
split ebuilds would enable us to update only the
On Sunday 12 June 2005 02:02, Wolfgang Illmeyer wrote:
In the discussion about kde split ebuilds, it was promised that the
split ebuilds would enable us to update only the programs that really
changed and save us from the bulk of recompiling the same code all over.
from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1, did
On Sunday 12 June 2005 01:02, Wolfgang Illmeyer wrote:
Hi,
I've installed kde-meta 3.4.0 and I just did an emerge -p kde-meta, and
it wants to install 252 ebuilds. If I do an emerge -up kde-meta, it
wants to install 331 ebuilds.
In the discussion about kde split ebuilds, it was promised that
maillog: 11/06/2005-08:48:17(-0400): Aron Griffis types
Georgi Georgiev wrote:[Fri Jun 10 2005, 08:04:25PM EDT]
maillog: 10/06/2005-13:19:30(-0400): Aron Griffis types
Btw, here's an interesting statistic which really doesn't add to (or
detract from, I hope) this discussion...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
You asked for patches. Both of these are incorporated in the 6.8.99
series, and have been around long enough that they should go into
6.8.2-r2 if it is going mainstream:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1259
On Sunday 12 June 2005 00:34, Brian wrote:
I believe I have found an error in the way porthole is using portage.
After an emerge sync which had a large number of update downloaded. I
switched to our upgrades view which stated building the treeview.
It was extremely slow, something I had
18 matches
Mail list logo
