Hi,
I got no answer on gentoo-user, so I try again here.
I've seen keywords m68k and ~m68k in several ebuilds and there's also an
m68k profile in the portage tree.
Does this mean I can put gentoo on my old Amiga? Is there a stage file
somewhere which I can test?
And finally: Anything I can
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 06:32, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
On Monday, June 20, 2005 9:30 pm, Wesley Leggette wrote:
Isn't that sort of like speaking French with English words?
Sorry, perhaps I should actually state what I need to do in clear
terms: I need to turn MyQuiteLongClassOrMethodName()
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 05:28, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 14:35, Alin Nastac wrote:
This would be fine as long as LINGUAS do not appear in IUSE. When
LINGUAS var is empty, the equery uses report would be an abomination .
The whole point is to add this stuff to IUSE and
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 05:46 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Does this mean I can put gentoo on my old Amiga?
kind of
Is there a stage file somewhere which I can test?
not yet ... but you can find binary packages here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/m68k/
And finally: Anything I can do to help?
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2005 15:02 schrieb ext Mike Frysinger:
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 05:46 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Is there a stage file somewhere which I can test?
not yet ... but you can find binary packages here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/m68k/
Ah yes, I will see if I find some
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help.
There is no
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Any reason why INPUT_DEVICES is needed in USE_EXPAND rather than just as local
USE flags? It's kind of the odd one out among the above.
The reasoning for that is that hardware support doesn't make
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 09:55 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2005 15:02 schrieb ext Mike Frysinger:
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 05:46 am, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
And finally: Anything I can do to help?
try to get a gcc version which doesnt segfault ? :)
Yep, that was the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
The reasoning for that is that hardware support doesn't make sense as
USE flags, so it should be something else. In this case, that was
INPUT_DEVICES. We haven't been able to take much advantage of it yet,
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:48 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
What the tool should basically do is in some way record the full names
(including namespaces) that were changed, and then at the end change them
back again.
That was one of the first things that I considered, but how would it know to
Alec Warner wrote:
There is no obvious way to freeze a Portage tree (or to design a
specific profile) for testing on a golden workstation, to build a set of
update packages (ServicePack) and push it to the workstations, or to
have centralized accountability of what's installed where. There is
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:[Fri Jun 17 2005, 10:05:32AM EDT]
On Friday 17 June 2005 04:32, Aron Griffis wrote:
Before working on a solution to the problem, could we get a more
complete list of the tools in question? This has come up before but
the list seems to always end with etc etc
Azarah wrote:[Sat Jun 18 2005, 07:23:19AM EDT]
You might however say install all gnuish tools with the 'g' prefix,
and then install wrapper scripts/stubs into say /usr/bin/gnu/ or
/bin/gnu/ (with /usr/bin/gnu/find calling gfind, etc), and portage
just adds this path as the first path to $PATH
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 20:42, Aron Griffis wrote:
In other words, I think you need to do some work in an overlay so that
you can present a real list of affected ebuilds and utilites, rather
than stating that you don't really know
Well this was just a discussion, no work should really start for
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help.
There is no
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:35:52PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I don't say that it cannot be done, and I don't ask what's the best way
to do it. I just ask *if* we should try to provide higher-level tools
(and/or doc) to help in doing so. It's not obvious (especially for
non-developers) how
16 matches
Mail list logo
