Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs is dead, let's move on

2005-07-11 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 20:34 +0200, Richard Fish wrote: I.o.w. is it still necessary to have RC_DEVICE_TARBALL=yes as a default or can we move to a pure udev system and change the default to no. I've been running my boxes successfully with no since the option showed up just fine :)

[gentoo-dev] G/FBSD compatibility: root:root and cp -a

2005-07-11 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Ok, to help devels know which are the requisites of Gentoo/FreeBSD porting (as we're going near to a release, I hope), I think it's better telling here what we hope you all will avoid (and we must replace when keywording). Those problems are also valid for ppc-macos AFAIK, so you won't help just

[gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Following the discussion me and Azarah had about make commands, I've started thinking of a way to fix this without being too intrusive and I found a bit of a solution following Az's suggestion to use a wrapper script. Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for make install is

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:20:20 +0200 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for make | install is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not | good. A solution can be to improve emake wrapper to check if install |

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for make install is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not good. A solution can be to improve emake wrapper to check if install is in its

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 11 July 2005 14:32, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Why not check which phase you're in instead? That also can be done, true. -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) pgpC1VHMPecuU.pgp Description: PGP

[gentoo-dev] ebookmerge unmask and ebook-*.ebuilds remove

2005-07-11 Thread José Alberto Suárez López
Hola :) after a week w/o bugs for ebookmerge i will unmask it and i will remove all the ebook-*.ebuilds if nobody say the secret word ;) regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:32:06 +0200 Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: | Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for make | install is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's | not

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebookmerge unmask and ebook-*.ebuilds remove

2005-07-11 Thread José Alberto Suárez López
El lun, 11-07-2005 a las 14:58 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen escribió: On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:53 +0200, José Alberto Suárez López wrote: after a week w/o bugs for ebookmerge i will unmask it and i will remove all the ebook-*.ebuilds if nobody say the secret word ;) A week? Any

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:13 +0200, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called 'browserplugin'. Yay! ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Karl Trygve Kalleberg
Hi gang, over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called 'browserplugin'. The change means that in order to have continued Java browser plugin support, you must add the useflag 'browserplugin' to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Kito
On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for make install is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not good. A solution can be to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Aron Griffis
KarlTK wrote: [Mon Jul 11 2005, 09:13:03AM EDT] over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called 'browserplugin'. I think I can speak for the mozilla team... this change looks good. Regards, Aron

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Am Montag 11 Juli 2005 15:13 schrieb Karl Trygve Kalleberg: Hi gang, over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called 'browserplugin'. Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 18:38 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: I vote for global use flag and useage in all browserplugins. Yes, I second that. ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] GET ME OF THIS LIST!

2005-07-11 Thread Lance Albertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I don't want to be an ignorant asss, but it is impossible for me to unsubscribe by myself right now. I currently only have webmail access, and the webmail program of my ISP will not accept an e-mail address in the form of gentoo-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
One issue I see with a `browserplugin' USE flag is that there may at some point be web browsers in the tree that support plugins that are not Mozilla-compatible. Although there are multiple Mozilla-compatible browsers (mainly browsers which use Mozilla code or have Mozilla embedded), the plugins

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebookmerge unmask and ebook-*.ebuilds remove

2005-07-11 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:10 +0200, José Alberto Suárez López wrote: * this app will not broke anything in the system or userside if it fails. * i will go in vacations soon * and i forget about 30 days sorry :P Those are not really valid points for breaking the policy - but it's too late now,

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebookmerge unmask and ebook-*.ebuilds remove

2005-07-11 Thread Robert Paskowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 a few : * this app will not broke anything in the system or userside if it fails. But users will get angry if a package is not working and start filling bugs. * i will go in vacations soon All the more reason _not_ to mark stable, since any

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 11 July 2005 20:56, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: Thus it is probably better for the USE flag to be called `mozillaplugin', to allow for the future introduction of other browser-specific plugin USE flags. profiles/use.local.desc:app-text/djvu:nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape

[gentoo-dev] New MySQL doc

2005-07-11 Thread Chris White
Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been working on: http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html Comments, etc are welcome. Chris White pgpuXmAvblVwE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New MySQL doc

2005-07-11 Thread John Myers
On Monday 11 July 2005 21:38, Chris White wrote: http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html Comments, etc are welcome. You might want to make Code listing 4.19: Finding our guest user in the user table a little narrower, as it makes the page much wider than my 1,280 pixel wide

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Aron Griffis
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:[Mon Jul 11 2005, 03:25:22PM EDT] profiles/use.local.desc:app-text/djvu:nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape compatible browsers We already have this that is the same at the end. This looks like the right thing to do instead of the browserplugin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Aron Griffis
Stefan Schweizer wrote: [Mon Jul 11 2005, 12:38:46PM EDT] Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow this step? acroread makes sense here gplflash, netscape-flash, netscape-plugger, mozplugger, mplayerplug-in? These are all plugins by definition, there's nothing to do

Re: [gentoo-dev] New MySQL doc

2005-07-11 Thread John Myers
On Monday 11 July 2005 21:38, Chris White wrote: http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html Comments, etc are welcome. Sorry for posting twice, but Code listing 4.11: REVOKE format is incorrect. It probably should say REVOKE [privleges] ON database.* FROM '[user]'@'[host]';

Re: [gentoo-dev] New MySQL doc

2005-07-11 Thread Julien Allanos
Chris White wrote: Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been working on: http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html Comments, etc are welcome. Chris White Nice guide! You might mention phpmyadmin as well, as it's a popular web-based gui to mysql. -- dju`

Re: [gentoo-dev] New MySQL doc

2005-07-11 Thread Francesco R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris White wrote: Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been working on: http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html Comments, etc are welcome. Chris White one reminder: Code listing 1.3: MySQL configuration probably

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebookmerge unmask and ebook-*.ebuilds remove

2005-07-11 Thread José Alberto Suárez López
El lun, 11-07-2005 a las 20:57 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen escribió: On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:10 +0200, José Alberto Suárez López wrote: * this app will not broke anything in the system or userside if it fails. * i will go in vacations soon * and i forget about 30 days sorry :P Those

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notice: Changing mozilla useflag to browserplugin for all Java runtimes

2005-07-11 Thread Karl Trygve Kalleberg
Stefan Schweizer wrote: Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow this step? acroread, gplflash, netscape-flash, netscape-plugger, mozplugger, mplayerplug-in? As Aaron points out, mplayerplug-in, mozplugger, netscape-plugger, netscape-flash and gplflash do not have the