On Thursday 21 July 2005 00:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> how is that not common operation ? SMTP AUTH is a pretty
> critical feature imho
It's not a supported on included part of qmail, which has not been
modified in a number of years. The functionality is provided only
via unofficial patches.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:28:31AM +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> > chsh has also been vetted for security problems a LOT more
> > closely than vchkpw. I don't trust vchkpw with suid-root.
> Then use suidctl?
I do on my production machines.
> > The postfix maintainers were asked about it once b
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 03:04 am, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:37:19AM +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> > I can confirm that - bincimap and qmail-pop3d run as root, so the
> > setuid bit is not necessary. I believe this is also the case for
> > dovecot 1.0 beta releases,
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 07:04, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> For common operation of qmail-smtpd, vchkpw is NOT required. SMTP
> AUTH is the only reason qmail-smtpd would call vchkpw.
True. Sorry for not realizing that.
> chsh has also been vetted for security problems a LOT more
> closely than vc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen skrev:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 20:21, Jochen Maes wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>>
>> bjarke, our new dev from the vast lands off Denmark, has been
>> added to the team!
>
> Another member for the Danish conspiracy:-)
>
> Welc
Ops... sorry.
On 7/20/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 06:46 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
> > Doing a grep on portage I found this another package with profile.d
> > things: dev-util/aegis
>
> if you read back about 8 e-mails in this thread you'll see i note
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 06:46 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
> Doing a grep on portage I found this another package with profile.d
> things: dev-util/aegis
if you read back about 8 e-mails in this thread you'll see i noted this
already but it should be ok as the package looks like it's removing the
Great!
Doing a grep on portage I found this another package with profile.d
things: dev-util/aegis
Thanks!
On 7/20/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 03:27 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
> > So... profile.d have future on Gentoo? If yes, any idea on when this
>
On Thursday 21 July 2005 00:09, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> So you're splitting this into separate ebuilds, or it comes that way
> from upstream?
Well, upstream is me, however, the package gets released in a big tarball
containing a global level configure script that can handle a all-at-once
insta
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:10:31PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 16:54 -0500, Brian D. Harring wrote:
> > Out of curiousity, has any put any thought into some automated method
> > or hook for allowing restarting of rc-scripts on upgrade/re-emerge of
> > a package?
> >
>
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 05:54 pm, Brian D. Harring wrote:
> Out of curiousity, has any put any thought into some automated method
> or hook for allowing restarting of rc-scripts on upgrade/re-emerge of
> a package?
such a completely automated thing is a bad idea ... detecting and warning
though
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 16:54 -0500, Brian D. Harring wrote:
> Out of curiousity, has any put any thought into some automated method
> or hook for allowing restarting of rc-scripts on upgrade/re-emerge of
> a package?
>
> Other question is if any such hook is even needed.
> So... thoughts? I don'
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 23:58 +0200, Christian Parpart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to create some ebuilds for at least one community server
> (represented
> by a bunch of ebuilds);
>
> So, I was looking for the right category for all of those ebuilds that belong
> to this software, however, I
On Wed, 2005-20-07 at 23:58 +0200, Christian Parpart wrote:
> community-libs/libyacs
> community-server/yacsd
> community-server/yacs-meta
> So, finally, in what category could those packages be placed in?
What about net-libs and net-misc ?
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
x8
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 23:58, Christian Parpart wrote:
> dev-libs/libyacsutil
> - the support library (client/server)
> community-libs/libyacs
> - the YaCS core framework library (server)
> community-server/yacsd
> - the UNIX daemon process finally serving the community
> app-admin/y
Out of curiousity, has any put any thought into some automated method
or hook for allowing restarting of rc-scripts on upgrade/re-emerge of
a package?
Other question is if any such hook is even needed.
So... thoughts? I don't really have any input on it, aside from I'd
like to gather what peop
Hi all,
I wanted to create some ebuilds for at least one community server (represented
by a bunch of ebuilds);
So, I was looking for the right category for all of those ebuilds that belong
to this software, however, I didn't find a proper category for each of them
at all :(
The software I am
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 20:21, Jochen Maes wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
> bjarke, our new dev from the vast lands off Denmark, has been added to
> the team!
Another member for the Danish conspiracy:-)
Welcome on board Bjarke!
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Security Team
pgpUiIRELDSNt.
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 03:27 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
> So... profile.d have future on Gentoo? If yes, any idea on when this
> will become part of baselayout.
yes, we will add it when i can get all remaining packages cleared of profile.d
we have bash-completion and tcsh left
-mike
--
gentoo
So... profile.d have future on Gentoo? If yes, any idea on when this
will become part of baselayout. Please, I'm not compelling... just
curious.
On 7/18/05, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> | On Monday 18 July
Jochen Maes skrev:
> Hey all,
>
>
> bjarke, our new dev from the vast lands off Denmark, has been added to
> the team!
> He's been working on the bugday website and has been helping out a lot
> for bugday.
>
> his intro:
> "I'm a 20 year old guy from Denmark studying software development.
> I like
Hey all,
bjarke, our new dev from the vast lands off Denmark, has been added to
the team!
He's been working on the bugday website and has been helping out a lot
for bugday.
his intro:
"I'm a 20 year old guy from Denmark studying software development.
I like spending my time with my friends a
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:32:29AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>>Duncan wrote:
>>| The AT guidelines (available for amd64 ATs here:
>>| http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml ) specifically
>>| mention testing "every conceivable permutation",
>>That'
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:32:29AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> | The AT guidelines (available for amd64 ATs here:
> | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml ) specifically
> | mention testing "every conceivable permutation",
> That's an absolute joke for reason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
| The AT guidelines (available for amd64 ATs here:
| http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml ) specifically
| mention testing "every conceivable permutation",
That's an absolute joke for reasonably large packages with s
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 01:43 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > This sounds like a request for the QA team. I tend to stay away
> > from most ~arch packages simply because most of our systems are
> > live production servers, but I'd be happy to test-drive new ebuilds
> > of vpopmail if it would help
Michael Cummings posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:59:42 -0400:
> I can't speak for other developers or herd maintainers, but if you have
> been using a perl package that is ~arch masked and think its as good as it
> gets, please file a 'bug' on bugzilla saying s
Recent thread on vpopmail had a few developers make this comment
(quoting robbat2):
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] VPopmail - SUID vchkpw
>In the absence of a proper QA team, users are some of the best
>large-scale QA available. All I'm asking
Robin H. Johnson posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:04:57 -0700:
>> > And as I've mentioned before I'd like MORE reports of packages working
>> > well before they are moved to stable arch. Without those stable
>> > working reports I don't have any means to judge j
Casey Allen Shobe posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Wed, 20 Jul 2005 01:32:30 +:
> Hello all, I'm sorry to bring this here, but I don't know where else to
> take it, and feel that I was treated really unfairly.
>
> As you know, I recently inquired about ebuild development on th
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:37:19AM +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> > So if this is still a problem in arch, but works in ~arch, you
> > SHOULD file a bug report.
> Why not just wait for the newer releases to make it to arch?
See my note as to why they haven't moved yet, and consider testing them
31 matches
Mail list logo
