On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:52:05PM +0200, dju` wrote:
Probably a silly question, but why choose nsplugin over browserplugin?
Aren't there any package that might provide plugins for
non-netscape-based browsers?
Yes, that's the exact reason for chosing nsplugin over browserplugin:
the latter
Mike Frysinger wrote:
anyone care if i move the lua USE flag to global scope ? noticed it was still
local when bumping swig ...
www-servers/lighttpd:lua - Use lua for mod_cml
Has my blessing.
--
I know not how I came into this, shall I call it a dying life or a
living death?
Alle 16:06, lunedì 17 ottobre 2005, Francesco R. ha scritto:
mysql-4.1.14 has been added to the tree on 29 Aug 2005, should be
time to stabilize the 4.1 branch of mysql.
has been reported on GWN, thanks gui
[snip]
If no one is versus I'll stabilize 4.1.14 for x86 and amd64
tomorrow (with
* Aron Griffis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the
USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During
the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing
USE=nsplugin was more appropriate.
Thomas Matthijs wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT]
We had discussed it prior and then nobody seemed to object to
browserplugin, only after we changed it.
Actually that's not true.
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg02898.html
You see that karltk said he would
Thomas Matthijs wrote:
* Aron Griffis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the
USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During
the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing
USE=nsplugin was more
Thomas Matthijs wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT]
You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it.
Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change.
All set. The only place browserplugin is mentioned is in the
ChangeLogs.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Aron Griffis wrote:
Thomas Matthijs wrote:[Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT]
You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it.
Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change.
All set. The only place browserplugin is mentioned is in the
ChangeLogs.
I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
developers on howto solve this bug.
Regards,
Petteri Räty (Betelgeuse)
Petteri Räty wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 03:39:04PM EDT]
Maybe there should also be a mention in gwn next week and the change
would then be committed on for example next tuesday.
It's already done. The ebuilds still honor USE=browserplugin but they
give a warning. Also the flag is marked as
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 22:58 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
developers on howto solve
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:58:51 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
This simple patch automatically bumps portage to the top of the merge list.
I've always wanted this feature and it is a dependency of bug 108262. Feedback
please. :)
Zac
Index: bin/emerge
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100479
The problem here is that we are iterating through pkgfiles.keys() and inside
the iteration loop we modify the obj variable so subsequent calls to
pkgfiles[obj] may fail. The obvious solution is to use a separate variable for
the pkgfiles key. My
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:30:56AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
As brought to my attention by Brian, the problem with my previously posted
patch is that the emerge sync cvs checkout will be owned by root and cvs
doesn't allow commits by root. Apparently we need to devise a scheme to
set the
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 16:49, Zac Medico wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
This simple patch automatically bumps portage to the top of the merge list.
I've always wanted this feature and it is a dependency of bug 108262.
Feedback please. :)
No good. ;)
What if
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 19:52, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:32:26 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 16:49, Zac Medico wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
This simple patch automatically bumps portage to the top of
17 matches
Mail list logo
