Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emerge =net-dialup/ppp-2.4.3-r10 will fail requesting for user action

2005-11-26 Thread Volkov Peter
Hello. Although my English is not perfect, may be you like my idea. On Птн, 2005-11-25 at 21:58 +0200, Alin Nastac wrote: I plan to release a new version of net-dialup/ppp that will add support for the pppd net module found in sys-apps/baselayout-/baselayout-1.12.0_pre11. I think it's good

[gentoo-dev] Removal of auto-use in portage-2.0.54

2005-11-26 Thread Marius Mauch
Hi, As I said earlier, we'd like to get rid of the nasty auto-use feature, including the support for the USE_ORDER variable. Right now we intend this for 2.0.54 (might not be the final version number) unless there are major objections to it. Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of auto-use in portage-2.0.54

2005-11-26 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 05:12:45PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: As I said earlier, we'd like to get rid of the nasty auto-use feature, including the support for the USE_ORDER variable. Right now we intend this for 2.0.54 (might not be the final version number) unless there are major

[gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Ned Ludd
Good afternoon, probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of stripping executables while gaining the ability to properly debug executables in bfd aware programs. It's been in testing with a small hand

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Bruno
On Saturday 26 November 2005 18:50, Ned Ludd wrote: Good afternoon, Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined. For me either way is good as long as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 19:30 +0100, Bruno wrote: [snip] What's the advantage of splitting out the debug info to some extra location instead of leaving it in the original binary (maybe smaller foot-print in memory while the debugging info is not used), Yes exactly a stripped binary will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Olivier Crête
On Sat, 2005-26-11 at 12:50 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: I'm in favor of it enabled per default but I'd like to know what you think and why. (advantages of on/off by default etc..) First, I fully support solar's patch, this feature should have been integrated into portage months ago. Anybody

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Ivan Yosifov
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 12:50 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: Good afternoon, probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of stripping executables while gaining the ability to properly debug executables in bfd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:50:30PM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined. would make more sense to have it be a FEATURE

[gentoo-dev] festival use flag

2005-11-26 Thread William Hubbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, The following packages have festival as a use flag: media-plugins/mythphone:festival - Enable festival support media-radio/xastir:festival - Enable festival support I would like to add this use flag to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher also.

Re: [gentoo-dev] festival use flag

2005-11-26 Thread Petteri Räty
William Hubbs wrote: All, The following packages have festival as a use flag: media-plugins/mythphone:festival - Enable festival support media-radio/xastir:festival - Enable festival support I would like to add this use flag to app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher also. Is 3 packages

[gentoo-dev] Re: festival use flag

2005-11-26 Thread Duncan
Petteri Räty posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:40:38 +0200: William Hubbs wrote: All, The following packages have festival as a use flag: media-plugins/mythphone:festival - Enable festival support media-radio/xastir:festival - Enable festival support I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Petteri Räty
Ned Ludd wrote: Good afternoon, Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined. Having a split debug pretty much obsoletes the need to add nostrip

Re: [gentoo-dev] festival use flag

2005-11-26 Thread Chris White
On Sunday 27 November 2005 05:26, William Hubbs wrote: All, The following packages have festival as a use flag: media-plugins/mythphone:festival - Enable festival support media-radio/xastir:festival - Enable festival support I would like to add this use flag to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Luca Barbato
Ned Ludd wrote: [snip] It's great! Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

2005-11-26 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 19:48 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote: On 11/26/05, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ned Ludd wrote: Good afternoon, Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for avifile, vcr, zphoto, drip, divx4linux, quicktime4linux

2005-11-26 Thread Luca Barbato
Luca Barbato wrote: [snip] avifile will be removed tomorrow since mlt and mlt++ (required by jahshaka as avifile replacement) will be released tomorrow. If you are maintaining or using one of the packages in the list keep in mind that it will be removed in 24h if aren't avifile free. lu

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emerge =net-dialup/ppp-2.4.3-r10 will fail requesting for user action

2005-11-26 Thread Alin Nastac
Volkov Peter wrote: I think it's good idea to add some *reasons* why that files are obsoleted. fex: * Gentoo is moving toward common configuration file for all network * interfaces. Thus starting from =ppp-2.4.3-r10 the following files * are obsoleted and should be removed to avoid future

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] .53, .54 and beyond...

2005-11-26 Thread Marius Mauch
Jason Stubbs wrote: On Saturday 26 November 2005 11:07, Marius Mauch wrote: On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:01:15 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only other new thing in trunk that I know of is logging but there's still a question mark over the ordering of messages... Can that be

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] .53, .54 and beyond...

2005-11-26 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:15 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Saturday 26 November 2005 02:05, Ned Ludd wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:51 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote: * post_sync action hook (.53/.54 ) * VDB prevention of single byte

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make dodoc return better values

2005-11-26 Thread Petteri Räty
Now dodoc always returns with success. I adjusted dodoc to return with better values. This way I can do the following in my bashrc. It would probably be better to do something like this by default, but that is an another discussion. Regards, Petteri Index: main/trunk/bin/dodoc

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make dodoc return better values

2005-11-26 Thread Petteri Räty
Petteri Räty wrote: Now dodoc always returns with success. I adjusted dodoc to return with better values. This way I can do the following in my bashrc. It would probably be better to do something like this by default, but that is an another discussion. Regards, Petteri Hmm. Forgot to