-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner schrieb:
|The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
|unique identifier string (for example, in metadata/repository_id) or
|whether it's user-assigned. The former is clearly the more sensible
|option, since it lets
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Possible proposal: the current council meeting rules be updated with
one of the following two clauses:
Each person at a council meeting may represent only one voting role.
Or:
A proxy must not be an existing council member, and any single person
may not be a proxy
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:19:41 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| DEPEND==foo-bar/baz-2.1::ciaranmssekritrepo
|
| which would add a restriction that only packages in
| ciaranmssekritrepo would be considered. This only works if the
| repository knows its own identifier, however...
|
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:00:02 +0100 Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to
| C++ users:
|
| ~ DEPENDS=gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1
That was my original thought when I started playing with it. I switched
to postfix to make it
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:12:08 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| What's needed is an extension of the portage configuration so that
| it's able to specify multiple standalone repos, slaved (overlay)
| repos chained against the standalones, package.* filters applied to
| each repo, etc.
To all,
After blowing my upgrade window by almost 2 hours bugzilla is back up,
albeit missing the pretty Gentoo theme. I will be putting that in after
I've taken a break, because this upgrade was NOT FUN.
First and foremost I want to thank some people over in #mozwebtools on
irc.mozilla.org for
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Local news delivery *should* still be using the user label. Unique
| repo internal labels don't matter to glep42, since the label that
| news delivery _should_ use is what the user's configuration has named
| it.
|
| Just stating it, since tagging a unique id into the
Here, have a goat.
It's on me
no, literally, get it off!
On 12/16/05, Jeffrey Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To all,
After blowing my upgrade window by almost 2 hours bugzilla is back up,
albeit missing the pretty Gentoo theme. I will be putting that in after
I've taken a break, because
Following the bugzilla upgrade, looks like email is now setting a field
procmail can filter on. so, ah, thanks! 'cause i know this bugzilla
upgrade was all secretly to satisfy me ;)
~mcummings, advocate of saving jforman from further torment without a
good cause, like sheer fun or something
--
Why not $(portageq newsdir) ? Currently, that would return only the
one for main tree, but if/whenever multi repo support it added, it
could return a space delimted list. This makes it simple to manage,
and lets the portage crew
a) figure out what they want to do
b) implement it while keeping
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Brian agreed with you that the extended dep syntax will be necessary
| at some point in the future. I also agree. So, knowing that glep 42
| doesn't require extended depset syntax, can we stop playing this game
| and just settle on something like newsdir=$(portageq
On 12/16/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Brian agreed with you that the extended dep syntax will be necessary
| at some point in the future. I also agree. So, knowing that glep 42
| doesn't require extended depset syntax, can we stop playing this game
|
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:17:13 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What the heck is this 'gentoo' thing, and how does it help? Shoving
| newsdir into portageq doesn't help *at all* with multiple repository
| support.
|
| Like I said in a previous email, 'gentoo' corresponds to
|
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:17:13 -0800 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What the heck is this 'gentoo' thing, and how does it help? Shoving
| newsdir into portageq doesn't help *at all* with multiple repository
| support.
|
| Like I said in a previous email, 'gentoo'
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Like I said in a previous email, 'gentoo' corresponds to 'magic-chicken' in
your news-magic-chicken.unread files. The news reader app gets the repo
identifier from the news-*.unread files and plugs that into portageq to get the
directory where the corresponding new items
Danny van Dyk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner schrieb:
|The big controversy seems to be over whether repositories carry a
|unique identifier string (for example, in metadata/repository_id) or
|whether it's user-assigned. The former is clearly the more sensible
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115707
dev-libs/commonc++ doesn't compile with gcc 3.4, and isn't depended
upon by anything. The replacement is dev-cpp/commoncpp2. Unless someone
screams soon I'll package.mask and remove.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:48:05AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
Just one remark: What about making the syntax a bit more familiar to C++
users:
~ DEPENDS=gentoo-foo::foo-bar/baz-2.1
Comments?
what about
DEPENDS=gentoo-foo/foo-bar/baz-2.1
No, screws over 1 depth categories.
~harring
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 02:55 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115707
dev-libs/commonc++ doesn't compile with gcc 3.4, and isn't depended
upon by anything. The replacement is dev-cpp/commoncpp2. Unless someone
screams soon I'll package.mask and remove.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
So... thoughts? I'm not much for making portage depend on tarsync
just for emerge-webrsync improvements, would rather chunk the bugger
out.
How about runtime detection?
runtime detection is questionable
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
So... thoughts? I'm not much for making portage depend on tarsync
just for emerge-webrsync improvements, would rather chunk the bugger
out.
How about runtime detection?
runtime
On Friday 16 December 2005 19:01, Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:09:10PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Thursday 15 December 2005 20:06, Brian Harring wrote:
This is the only blocker for merging parallel-fetch as far as I can
tell- so... my vote is nuking the wait out of
22 matches
Mail list logo
