Mike Frysinger posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:07:15 -0500:
any last issues people wish to cover before we start finishing this up ?
FWIW, I've already filed a bug, and had it marked invalid, due to this,
because it was using xml for xml2, despite the fact
Hi all.
Mark_alec just joined the team as our newest global forums moderator.
I'm sure he's already well known on our busy forums :)
He writes about himself: I am a 16 year high school student who is
interested in computers, physics, chemistry and maths. I also am part
of a very successful
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Mark_alec just joined the team as our newest global forums moderator.
I'm sure he's already well known on our busy forums :)
Welcome newest Forum Victim^^Staffer!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi all.
I've got another new victim to present :) Scott is joining the amd64
team that he's already been a part of for the last few months helping
out as an AT (arch tester).
Scott has experience with C/C++, Java, Python, SQL and is a long time
Gentoo user.
Scott writes: I've been heavily
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got another new victim to present :) Scott is joining the amd64
team that he's already been a part of for the last few months helping
out as an AT (arch tester).
Welcome to the team, again ;)
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 21:52 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I've got another new victim to present :) Scott is joining the amd64
team that he's already been a part of for the last few months helping
out as an AT (arch tester).
Welcome to the team Scott.
Welcome to our team and
Anyone that is maintaining a binary package in the tree, and requires
libstdc++-v3, please put a rdepend in your package on
=virtual/libstdc++-3.3. I'd like to drop the dependency from gcc-3.4 and
higher so that we do not needlessly force the libstdc++ package on people
that do not need it.
On Thursday 09 February 2006 08:19, Mark Loeser wrote:
Anyone that is maintaining a binary package in the tree, and requires
libstdc++-v3, please put a rdepend in your package on
=virtual/libstdc++-3.3. I'd like to drop the dependency from gcc-3.4 and
higher so that we do not needlessly force
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 - 3.4 upgrade.
Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until
being recompiled after the upgrade and there is currently no way to
express this with dependencies.
You need either
On Thursday 09 February 2006 09:30, Mark Loeser wrote:
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 - 3.4 upgrade.
Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until
being recompiled after the upgrade and there is currently no
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 09 February 2006 09:30, Mark Loeser wrote:
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 - 3.4 upgrade.
Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until
being recompiled
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I've got another new victim to present :) Scott is joining the amd64
team that he's already been a part of for the last few months helping
out as an AT (arch tester).
Scott has experience with C/C++, Java, Python, SQL and is a long time
Gentoo user.
Scott
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 19:24, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2006 08:19, Mark Loeser wrote:
Anyone that is maintaining a binary package in the tree, and requires
libstdc++-v3, please put a rdepend in your package on
=virtual/libstdc++-3.3. I'd like to drop the
13 matches
Mail list logo
