-3.1.4 now in portage
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Jakub Moc wrote:
I bet there's a bug open for it.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482
. How's portage 2.1 getting along? I notice it gets frequent
updates.
The gentoo-portage-dev list is the place to follow this.
Also,
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
-3.1.4 now in portage
Why did you add that, without adding metadata ? That is just wrong.
It is better to remove it if there is no maintainer, you upping it
without adding yourself as maintainer is no form of maintenance. This is
foser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
-3.1.4 now in portage
Why did you add that, without adding metadata ? That is just wrong.
It is better to remove it if there is no maintainer, you upping it
without adding yourself as maintainer is
On 15/04/06, Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
foser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I still say it should be removed in 30 days.
I agree. There is a lot of stuff that suffers from being unmaintained,
and I think we should strive towards cleaning that up. It helps no one
if there isn't anyone
On Saturday 15 April 2006 12:07, Mark Loeser wrote:
I agree. There is a lot of stuff that suffers from being unmaintained,
and I think we should strive towards cleaning that up. It helps no one
if there isn't anyone to claim responsibility for the package when there
is a problem.
and it
www-servers/pound is without an active maintainer and has an open security bug
#118541
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118541
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata/herd info and CC yourself on the bug.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo
Allen Rohner wrote:
I am looking to use Gentoo to create a standard x86 environment complete
with apache and X, but with no gcc or portage on the target machine.
Additionally, use the same technique to cross-compile to a ppc embedded
system.
You might take a look at GNAP [1]. I'm not sure if
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:06:00AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
dev-libs/openobex-1.2 is now in the tree.
Why did you p.mask openobex-apps before openobex-1.2 is stable?
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpD05qBotCsV.pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:01:56AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:31, Brian Harring wrote:
cache backend selection (failed import == defaults to sys default)
This is incorrect. It displays an error
On Apr 15, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Duncan wrote:
Wouldn't the help them out default be consistent with the
non-interactive goal for portage? Quit if there's no sane way to go
forward without potentially breaking a system, but otherwise, use sane
fallbacks where they are possible.
I don't think
Hi guys,
I wonder why the default behaviour of portage is to generate ._cfg_foo
files only one time after a --sync. For example I have done the following;
- emerge --sync
- emerge baselayout --oneshot -v
._cfg_foo files are created so I can use dispatch-conf to select which one
I want
Hey all,
I'm just wading through a list of ~200 bugs of which some need decisions what
should be done, whether it should be done at all or simply whether it is a bug
or not.
Bug: SRC_URI: spaces not supported
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
Is this a 'NOTABUG' case?
Bug: gpg:
Philipp Riegger posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:12:09 +0200:
But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i
post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even if i
have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does
On Saturday 15 April 2006 18:51, Duncan wrote:
man emerge, search on --noconfmem, or emerge --help. Both the usual
places one looks for documentation on command line options for a Unix
command cover it. That seems decent documentation to me, as I didn't
remember what the option was either
On Saturday 15 April 2006 10:51, Simon Stelling wrote:
Bug: SRC_URI: spaces not supported
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
Is this a 'NOTABUG' case?
personally i'd say not worth the hassle, fix the brain dead URL
Bug: gpg: strict incorrectly takes priority over severe
16 matches
Mail list logo
