[gentoo-dev] DEPEND/RDEPEND question

2006-04-25 Thread Alin Nastac
Lets say a package foo depends on bar, both at compile time and run time. Shouldn't DEPEND _and_ RDEPEND of the foo package reflect that dependency? I usually set DEPEND=$RDEPEND ... or vice-versa (depending on which is the most demanding). Am I utterly wrong here? I know that when a package is

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND/RDEPEND question

2006-04-25 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:53:58AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote: Lets say a package foo depends on bar, both at compile time and run time. Shouldn't DEPEND _and_ RDEPEND of the foo package reflect that dependency? I usually set DEPEND=$RDEPEND ... or vice-versa (depending on which is the most

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND/RDEPEND question

2006-04-25 Thread Alec Warner
Alin Nastac wrote: Lets say a package foo depends on bar, both at compile time and run time. Shouldn't DEPEND _and_ RDEPEND of the foo package reflect that dependency? I usually set DEPEND=$RDEPEND ... or vice-versa (depending on which is the most demanding). Am I utterly wrong here? I know

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: bangert

2006-04-25 Thread Daniel
Thilo Bangert has decided to return after an extended vacation (previously with Gentoo in 2002). The fun life of studying all over the world has finally caught up with him and really needs some bug and ebuild theropy (particulary of the net-mail variety). Please welcome Thilo to theropy as he

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: bangert

2006-04-25 Thread Markus Ullmann
Hopefully he signs some contracts to never leave again... Re-Welcome on board :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: bangert

2006-04-25 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2002? Vintage! Welcome back. Daniel wrote: Thilo Bangert has decided to return after an extended vacation (previously with Gentoo in 2002). The fun life of studying all over the world has finally caught up with him and really needs some bug

[gentoo-dev] Purpose of USE=doc

2006-04-25 Thread Jakub Moc
Hello here, I'd like to see some clarification of intended doc use flag usage, so that we wouldn't force users to download/install 40+ megs of docs for a ~3 meg package, with the only reason being that USE=doc is for developer documentation only. [1] And no, I don't think we need yet another use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Purpose of USE=doc

2006-04-25 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 25/04/06, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello here, I'd like to see some clarification of intended doc use flag usage, so that we wouldn't force users to download/install 40+ megs of docs for a ~3 meg package, with the only reason being that USE=doc is for developer documentation

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo theming during bootup

2006-04-25 Thread Matthew Gaule
Could a simple USE flag (Such as branding) be implemented, which if set, will pull in and configure gentoo themes when a package is compiled? This could be unset by default, meaning most users would not be effected by this. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo theming during bootup

2006-04-25 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Matthew Gaule wrote: Could a simple USE flag (Such as branding) be implemented, which if set, will pull in and configure gentoo themes when a package is compiled? This could be unset by default, meaning most users would not be effected by this.] If most users are unaffected by the change,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo theming during bootup

2006-04-25 Thread Dave Shanker
It could be set as a default use flag and those not wanting any branding can add '-branding' to their make.conf Regards, On 4/25/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Gaule wrote: Could a simple USE flag (Such as branding) be implemented, which if set, will pull in and