[gentoo-dev] LINGUAS support

2006-05-15 Thread Tuan Van
The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf. Then I realized some package doesn't respect that variable (ie eject) Would it be better (easier) to have portage removes those extra locales in

[gentoo-dev] Re: LINGUAS support

2006-05-15 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
localepurge works fine. No need for portage to do it. Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 15 May 2006, Tuan Van wrote: The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf. Then I

Re: [gentoo-dev] LINGUAS support

2006-05-15 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Tuan Van wrote: The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf. Then I realized some package doesn't respect that variable (ie eject) Would it be better (easier)

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] RPM build changes

2006-05-15 Thread Nimish Pachapurkar
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 01:55 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 16:05 -0700, Nimish Pachapurkar wrote: Hello All, I have been fiddling with Portage for a few weeks now. Recently, I was trying to get the RPM creation with ebuild to work a little better. I noticed that currently