On Wednesday 24 May 2006 07:42, Jakub Moc wrote:
Please, make portage spit out the errors in English by *default* to not
waste people's time. If someone insists on overriding it, then let them
do it in make.conf
and where do you propose we document said override ? in the locale guide ?
then
This is status report from the TeX department of text-markup, which I
find necessary due to partly sad, partly exiting news :)
So if you don't care about TeX you may skip this post.
The sad news first:
A couple of days ago Thomas Esser (the te in teTeX) announced[1] that he
wont make another
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:02, Martin Ehmsen wrote:
We are currently considering using the same approach as with the
perl packages (using new-style virtuals), but I guess thats on hold until
it is okay to introduce additional new-style virtuals?
As long as the name does not clash with the name
Hi Donnie,
Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 05:20 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
With great pleasure, I announce the testing release of new eselect
modules for BLAS, CBLAS and LAPACK implementations. You may say, But
we already have 'eselect blas' and 'eselect lapack,' Donnie! What are
you thinking? In
On Thu, 25 May 2006 21:57:30 -0400
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a tiny diff for make.conf, can someone with l337 skills in
manpages look it over before it gets commited.
Easiest way to check how a man page looks is to do:
nroff -man raw man page | less
--
Kevin F. Quinn
On Fri, 26 May 2006 02:28:44 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 02:27, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 21:57:30 -0400
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a tiny diff for make.conf, can someone with l337
skills in manpages look
