Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Philip Webb
060617 Mike Frysinger wrote: can people give 1.11.15-r3 a run through ? I've been using 1.12.0-r1 since 060604 without any problems ... (smile) I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). --

[gentoo-dev] [Last Rites] app-text/bow

2006-06-18 Thread Danny van Dyk
* No maintainer. * It is a library w/o executable in the tree (would be Rainbow, Crossbow or Arrow). * It has one open bug (#88302). * No upstream release since 2002, so little chance to fix bug #88302. app-text/bow is already masked, pending removal in 30 days unless someone steps up to

[gentoo-dev] Changes to the way Java packages are built

2006-06-18 Thread Joshua Nichols
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 = Background = As some might have noticed, Java 1.5 has been package.masked for some time now. There are a number of issues introduced with 1.5 that have kept it in package.mask. Please see the Java 1.5 FAQ [1] for more details. [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). people are *not* happy when their machine cannot boot -mike pgp7nVT5KH2DY.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Maintainer wanted for dev-lang/pike

2006-06-18 Thread Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
dev-lang/pike is without an active maintainer and has an open security bug 136065 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136065 Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update metadata/herd info and CC yourself on the bug. -- Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to the way Java packages are built

2006-06-18 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: Joshua Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:39:06 -0500: I have written documentation on switching to the new system, from the user's perspective, over at our wiki [6] [6]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Roy Marples
On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). people are *not* happy when their machine cannot boot -mike Are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to the way Java packages are built

2006-06-18 Thread Francesco Riosa
I'm surprised from the lack of Thanks a lot Java Team, so please let me have the honour to be the first on this ml ;-) The work done has been impressive, the number of package involved great, thanks _a_lot_ for all you did. Francesco R. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Philip Webb
060618 Roy Marples wrote: On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). people are *not* happy when their machine

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 18 June 2006 14:11, Roy Marples wrote: On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). people are

Re: [gentoo-dev] embedded overlay on overlays.gentoo.org

2006-06-18 Thread Ryan Tandy
Stefan Schweizer wrote: Hi, solar has requested an account on overlays.gentoo.org for the embedded overlay for you. Your password: DX7wnSe40Y Kind regards, Stefan o_O -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2006-06-18 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15664 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in

[gentoo-portage-dev] Manifest verification

2006-06-18 Thread Andrei Slavoiu
Hello, I want to raise a issue with the way that package integrity verification is done by portage. For an example of such an issue see bug 136742. The idea is that portage now checks the Manifest as a whole, not allowing a version of the package to be emerged if any of the files mentioned by the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Manifest verification

2006-06-18 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Andrei Slavoiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I want to raise a issue with the way that package integrity verification is done by portage. For an example of such an issue see bug 136742. The idea is that portage now checks the Manifest as a whole,

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Manifest verification

2006-06-18 Thread Alec Warner
Now I get it. So could somebody add a line to make.conf.example that says which features are on by default? I didn't notice strict was on. We can't tell you that, FEATURES are stacked, first make.defaults, and then from your profile setting; aka the default FEATURES are only known at runtime