On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:00:46 +0200
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 01 July 2006 00:31, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
Paul,
Congratulations! What did you and your wife name him? When
exactly was he born, etc?
Give us details!!
:)
Official name: Tom Wei
Calling
Alec Warner wrote:
dev-libs/nana bug # 32672 - Removed
x11-wm/blwm bug # 71479 - Removed
app-editors/gnotepad+ bug # 122993 - Removed
net-misc/powerd bug # 70373 - Removed
dev-lisp/cl-clx-sbcl bug # 134623 - Removed
app-office/gnofin and gnome-extra/gnobog bug # 134624 - Removed
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:12 +, Duncan wrote:
For example, if we hand out CDs at conventions etc, we would have to
also hand out source CDs.
As my reply there, however, Gentoo does still have it better than most, in
that the LiveCDs contain relatively few binaries, and they tend to be
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 19:23 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
Can we have another Sunrise discussion please? I would love to have some
feedback about Sunrise, about our progress and where we are still lacking.
What exactly is there to discuss about this? It is not an official
project
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:25:45PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
If nobody objects I'll package.mask net-wireless/bluez-kernel in 7
days, pending removal 30 days later.
Added to package.mask pending removal, bug #132600.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo
All what that package provides is already in the vainilla kernel.
That's why it isn't being updated anymore. Personally, and due to the
fact that it is even advised to not use bluez-kernel, I would proceed
with the masking and removal asap.
On 7/2/06, Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
What exactly is there to discuss about this?
Evaluating our progress with hashing out the details etc.
It is not an official
project anymore, so the council really has no bearing on it. I'm
guessing you would like for it to become an official project.
correct.
If I
On Sunday 02 July 2006 10:10, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 19:23 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Can we have another Sunrise discussion please? I would love to have some
feedback about Sunrise, about our progress and where we are still
lacking.
What exactly is there to
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Serverside checks are overkill imo since we check that later ourselves when
reviewing. It is also harder to implement in general and especially now
because the administrator of the server, jokey, has exams this week.
Nope, you need them to avoid smart stupid
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15968 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
11 matches
Mail list logo
