Robert Szentmihalyi wrote:
is there a group limit for NFS exported file systems in recent
kernels? One if my users cannot access directories that belong to a
group he actually _is_ a member of. That, however, is true only when
accessing them over NFS. On the local file system, everything is
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:34:27 +0200 Andrej Kacian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:42:27 +0200
Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
mpd (and xmms2) is just a server that is responsible for music playback,
functionality such as xosd notification can be provided by
Hi all,
app-pda/rapip has been masked and is pending removal from the portage
tree. Upstream has stopped maintaining this and I believe that kpilot
and others are a good replacement for it.
Due to the lack of man power and my general lack of interest with
anything that requires KDE, I am
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:58:05PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
I've got switching my nfs installations to coda for right some
time, and so I'd offer to maintain the package.
Actually I'm looking for a Gentoo developer to take over maintenance.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Robert Cernansky wrote:
Unfortunatelly this is something different. xmm-pipe lets you control
running xmms from commandline (thus binding these commands to
keys). It allows control volume, skipping in current track (fast
forward), do some playlist
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 04:58:02PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Don't forget that this will require an update to (at least)
eselect-opengl, too.
Actually I'm not sure it would. eselect-opengl currently checks
/usr/lib[,64,32]/opengl/ for 32bit opengl libs libs and only finds the
emul libs
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Are they configuration-file compatible, including the location of said
configuration files?
[homedir]/.kde3.5/share/config/koverartistrc is obviously different from
[homedir]/.kde3.5/share/config/koverrc (both path and contents),
but it doesn't needs manual intervent
I have been busy all the summer! Is there any news about the TeXLive ebuild?
About the texmf tree, is there really many packages that would be included in
each distributions? Would a modular ebuild system like the one used by Gnome
(emerge gnome and emerge gnome-lite) and X.org would be nice for
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 17:26 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
We've had a global vision for where Gentoo is going from before I
joined - Gentoo is here to create a source-based distribution where
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 22:36 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 14:00 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Oh, gimme a break. Screaming about it on -dev for hundreds of posts
isn't just equivalent to a vote, it's better. It makes people think
there's
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 13:26 +0100, Herbie Hopkins wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 04:58:02PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Don't forget that this will require an update to (at least)
eselect-opengl, too.
Actually I'm not sure it would. eselect-opengl currently checks
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[snip]
How do you kick someone out of a project? Currently, I know of no way
to do so.
It's at the leads discretion. For amd64 me and my OP leads talk it over
and make a decision. I suspect that most leads simply don't have the
balls to remove someone. It's not an
Mike Doty wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[snip]
How do you kick someone out of a project? Currently, I know of no way
to do so.
It's at the leads discretion. For amd64 me and my OP leads talk it over
and make a decision. I suspect that most leads simply don't have the
balls to remove
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:45:36AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
As Weeve said, he's still trying to get people to stop breaking SPARC
keywords, just like 3 years ago. It's just when trying to do anything
larger than a single project that you run into issues.
People that do this sort of
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:25:53 +0200 Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So if by breaking the keyword someone breaks a policy, it is something
| devrel should and will deal with.
Should, sure. Care to back up the will part?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaran dot mccreesh at
Tach Gabriel, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Gabriel Lavoie schrieb:
About the texmf tree, is there really many packages that would be
included in each distributions? Would a modular ebuild system like the
one used by Gnome (emerge gnome and emerge gnome-lite) and
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:29:03PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Quite frankly, I think that with a properly run community, there should
be no need for a Developer Relations project, since it should be
mostly self-policing.
With 300+ people, i severely doubt self policing would work. I assume
So, I'm curious -- did anyone ever come to a decision what to do on the
matter? The list traffic seems to be dying down. Maybe I just missed
the final decision email.
Not that it really matters, but here's my 2 cents:
If its a pita to maintain, hard mask everything and just say sorry, no
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:35:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:25:53 +0200 Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So if by breaking the keyword someone breaks a policy, it is something
| devrel should and will deal with.
Should, sure. Care to back up the will
Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:35:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:25:53 +0200 Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So if by breaking the keyword someone breaks a policy, it is something
| devrel should and will deal with.
Should, sure. Care
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 19:13 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:29:03PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Quite frankly, I think that with a properly run community, there should
be no need for a Developer Relations project, since it should be
mostly self-policing.
With
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 19:27 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
What i can assure you is that there is a policy that says so, and that
policies are there to be followed.
I thought that you'd been around long enough to laugh at this one,
yourself. Sure the policies are there to be followed. That
Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:20:52 -0600:
So, I'm curious -- did anyone ever come to a decision what to do on the
matter? The list traffic seems to be dying down. Maybe I just missed
the final decision email.
Well, no one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Cummings wrote:
This package was absorbed back into perl-core/Test-Simple as of the 0.62
release (which you have either via dev-lang/perl-5.8.8 or as the ebuild
at this point). I'm package.mask'ing it and will be removing it from the
tree
On 8/24/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A distribution is more than just an entity that packages upstream
tarballs. I agree with your point, but it misses a large chunk of what
we do.
We do more than that, sure, but the vast majority of the day to day
work in Gentoo is exactly
On 8/24/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A distribution is more than just an entity that packages upstream
tarballs. I agree with your point, but it misses a large chunk of what
we do.
We do more than that, sure, but the vast majority of the day to day
work in Gentoo is exactly
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:41:16 +0100 Stuart Herbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Seriously - what exactly is this enormous brick wall that folks need
| a boost from management to climb over?
1. Portage.
2. Tree QA.
3. www.g.o.
Those three should get you started.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail
Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Fri Aug 25 2006, 01:35:53PM CDT]
See, you missed that we're talking with the idea of people belonging to
a project. If you work on my project and quit, I'll know. If you go
AWOL, I'll know. I can then simply ask Infra to remove your access. It
really should be that
* Maurice van der Pot [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:58:05PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
I've got switching my nfs installations to coda for right some
time, and so I'd offer to maintain the package.
Actually I'm looking for a Gentoo developer to take over
Steve Dibb wrote:
So, I'm curious -- did anyone ever come to a decision what to do on the
matter? The list traffic seems to be dying down. Maybe I just missed
the final decision email.
Not that it really matters, but here's my 2 cents:
If its a pita to maintain, hard mask everything and
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 16:49 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
I don't see how whining about a package you don't maintain, nor helping
out with it helps anyone. Either it stays in pmask, or it stays in
sunrise (since I would bet 5 bucks it ends up in sunrise after getting
punted). The sound team has
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
From what I see, projects are pretty free to govern themselves. How do
you see it differently?
As Weeve said, he's still trying to get people to stop breaking SPARC
keywords, just like 3 years ago. It's just when trying to do anything
larger than a single project
PORTAGE:
Portage developers are afraid to put anything new in the tree for fear
of breaking things (and somewhat rightly so). But as noted, it also
means you get new stuff very infrequently.
I think the portage team has either done a poor job of bringing their
issues to the table; or the
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 22:36 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
From what I see, projects are pretty free to govern themselves. How do
you see it differently?
How do you kick someone out of a project? Currently, I know of no way
to do so.
What process is required for
For all 2 of the users of freenet6, I mistakenly removed it today and
then restored it to cvs. Between the deletion and restoration there was
a cvs-rsync run, so it may be broken for a sliver of time. Hopefully
if should be fixed now.
Sorry for my mistake, I had cvs rm'd the files and then
app-emulation/pose and net-misc/bidwatcher were punted today.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
36 matches
Mail list logo
