net-misc/bcm4400 is a kernel driver built as an external package through
portage. The codebase which this package use has been discontinued
upstream. The upstream replacement (which is not in Portage directly) is
simply a copy of the in-kernel b44 driver code.
For this reason we are
Hey you Gentoo-Developers!
On gentoo.org, in the great announcement of Gentoo 2006.1, it says:
The most popular architectures now use GCC 4.1, glibc 2.4 and baselayout
1.12.1, as well as including a new profile layout, with separate desktop
and server profiles.
So i took you at your word, but
I think that cairo, logrotate, openexr, udev and vnc USE flags should be
global. These are now local USE flags.
Do you agree to change their globalness?
Jak zerwać z dziewczyną, która potrafi fruwać, przenosić
góry i przebijać wzrokiem
On Thursday 31 August 2006 07:24, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
I think that cairo, logrotate, openexr, udev and vnc USE flags should be
global. These are now local USE flags.
Gotta say why along with that.
Jak zerwać z
Chris White wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 07:24, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
I think that cairo, logrotate, openexr, udev and vnc USE flags should be
global. These are now local USE flags.
Gotta say why along with that.
Local use flags:
cairo: 15
logrotate: 8
Steve Dibb wrote:
And the descriptions seem to be pretty much the same in all of them from
use.local.desc
I think we agreed at least 3 times on that the logrotate use flag
shouldn't exist at all because those files add 4kb to the package.
About the udev, there's one package that doesn't share
On Thursday 31 August 2006 16:58, Simon Stelling wrote:
I think we agreed at least 3 times on that the logrotate use flag
shouldn't exist at all because those files add 4kb to the package.
Right. Open a bug and cc involved maintainers. This is the way it works -
maybe slowly, but it does. We
Simon Stelling wrote:
I think we agreed at least 3 times on that the logrotate use flag
shouldn't exist at all because those files add 4kb to the package.
Please look at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/35754 .
I said it once, I'm saying again: squid need this USE flag.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:58:20 +0200 Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I think we agreed at least 3 times on that the logrotate use flag
| shouldn't exist at all because those files add 4kb to the package.
No we didn't. It's another file in /etc, which is entirely different
from another
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Thu Aug 31 2006, 10:37:21AM CDT]
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:58:20 +0200 Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I think we agreed at least 3 times on that the logrotate use flag
| shouldn't exist at all because those files add 4kb to the package.
No we didn't. It's
* Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
just found another broken package that uses the 'static' USE flag
to control generation of static libraries (aka libfoo.a)
this is very much wrong ... USE=static is only to control the static-ness of
binaries ... if your package has an option to
On Thursday 31 August 2006 13:19, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
BTW: is there a way to control whether static libs should be
installed ?
`man make.conf` - INSTALL_MASK
dont even think about filing a bug though when something breaks because it's
missing static libs cause it'll just make me stab you
Sven Köhler wrote:
This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be
a supported server profile at this time. For a supported server
profile, please check the Hardened project (http://hadrened.gentoo.org).
(Beside that, there is a spelling mistake: it should read
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 13:19, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
BTW: is there a way to control whether static libs should be
installed ?
`man make.conf` - INSTALL_MASK
dont even think about filing a bug though when something breaks because it's
missing static libs cause
On Thursday 31 August 2006 15:42, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I just filed bug #140776 for you because I masked out all shared
libraries and my system doesn't work. You only mentioned masking out
static libraries so I didn't mask those out.
Please consider this a serious issue and fix it ASAP.
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 13:19, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
BTW: is there a way to control whether static libs should be
installed ?
`man make.conf` - INSTALL_MASK
dont even think about filing a bug though when something breaks because it's
missing
Hiya all,
Just a quick note to let you know that the Paludis guys are happy to
inform you that they've just released version 0.6.0 of Paludis, the most
popular and widely used alternative to Portage. With this release
they're finally more or less VDB compatible with Portage, so switching
to and
On Thursday 31 August 2006 18:53, Chris White wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 15:42, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I just filed bug #140776 for you because I masked out all shared
libraries and my system doesn't work. You only mentioned masking out
static libraries so I didn't mask those out.
On Thursday 31 August 2006 19:41, Alec Warner wrote:
He didn't say use install masked to mask out shared libraries he said
use install mask to mask static libraries.
looks like two people missed the short bus actually ...
-mike
pgpL1XLzxTYzu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hiya all,
Just a quick note to let you know that the Paludis guys are happy to
inform you that they've just released version 0.6.0 of Paludis, the most
popular and widely used alternative to Portage. With this release
they're finally more or less VDB compatible
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 19:41, Alec Warner wrote:
He didn't say use install masked to mask out shared libraries he said
use install mask to mask static libraries.
looks like two people missed the short bus actually ...
-mike
JEEVES!?
And yes I a realized it was a
Hi all,
I have a need to selectively run src_test() for some packages, but do
not want to run it for all like FEATURES=test. Has anyone discussed or
thought about this?
If not, here is my proposal. Have a /etc/portage/package.test file that
contains packages that will run src_test().
On Thursday 31 August 2006 20:06, Christopher Chan wrote:
I have a need to selectively run src_test() for some packages, but do
not want to run it for all like FEATURES=test. Has anyone discussed or
thought about this?
what you actually want is per-package environment variables
search
23 matches
Mail list logo
