Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Required Features for $package_manager to Aid... Development!

2006-09-09 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 21:19 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: I've been inspired by the local/global USE flag threads recently posted by Doug (Cardoe), and it got me to thinking... I've recently joined the pkgcore development effort, and was asked by Brian (ferringb) what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paid support

2006-09-09 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 05:06 +, Duncan wrote: I see (and appreciate) his point tho. As you say, we /should/ be in the clear. However, if we use the wrong language on the paid support setup page, then the IRS /could/ find that the corporations are hiring Gentoo developers in a quid-pro-quo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paid support

2006-09-09 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
I am just wondering, how does this affect European developers? Does this make us financially active in the US even if we work for a European company due to the fact that we are bound to Gentoo Foundation which *is* registered as a NFP Organization in the US? What are our responsibilities from

[gentoo-dev] New Developer - Vlastimil Babka

2006-09-09 Thread Christel Dahlskjaer
Bordering with Germany, Austria, Slovakia and Poland you find the Czech Republic, smack bang in the centre you find Prague, one of my all time favourite places to go for a long weekend of cheap beer and much fun. Beer isn't all that comes out of this place though, they also make mighty fine Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer - Vlastimil Babka

2006-09-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Bordering with Germany, Austria, Slovakia and Poland you find the Czech Republic, smack bang in the centre you find Prague, one of my all time favourite places to go for a long weekend of cheap beer and much fun. Beer isn't all that comes out of this place though,

[gentoo-dev] Suggestion: Globalization of some USE flags

2006-09-09 Thread arfrever
Dear Developers of Gentoo, I would really appreciate if you decided to globalize cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. cairo and openexr USE flags are used by enough amount of packages. cairo and udev USE flags are set defaultly in many profiles. Arfrever -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Christel Dahlskjaer
Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30 days. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30 days. In the future, could you please CC the maintainers

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer - Vlastimil Babka

2006-09-09 Thread Peter Gordon
Welcome, Vlastimil! :) -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) Gentoo Forums Global Moderator GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Christel Dahlskjaer
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 12:32 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 12:32 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding

[gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-09 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Bryan Østergaard wrote: [..] Adding a bit of structure to it seemed like a good thing and I'd argue that the small bit of structure have helped keep the discussion on track. I talked with kloeri in private about this and a GLEP that allows giving out bugzilla access permissions by

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:44:51PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 12:32 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no progress in resolving it. It has now

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer - Vlastimil Babka

2006-09-09 Thread Jakub Moc
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: As of today, the Java team has a new member; Vlastimil Babka aka Caster. 24 years old, CompSci student at the Charles University of Prague. Well, I say new, in actual facts he has been contributing for quite some time. Yay!!! Finally someone to wrangle all those

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Saturday 09 September 2006 21:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30 days. Unless anyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Saturday 09 September 2006 20:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30 days. Hi. shillelagh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:28:10 +0100 Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Saturday 09 September 2006 21:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: | Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen | no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and | unless someone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Required Features for $package_manager to Aid... Development!

2006-09-09 Thread S. Lockwood-Childs
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Chris Gianelloni wrote: #8. Ability to list the dependency tree for packages, even if some of the dependencies are masked by keywords, rather than throwing up the this package is masked by keywords error for each one, allowing one to see *quickly* all of the packages that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Jakub Moc
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:28:10 +0100 Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Saturday 09 September 2006 21:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: | Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen | no progress in resolving it. It has now been

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Required Features for $package_manager to Aid... Development!

2006-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 23:19, Ryan Hill wrote: - current pet peeve is some way of dealing with SRC_URI's that use dynamic redirects to the source files tell upstream people to stop being stupid -mike pgpt1iMxa8QRd.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Required Features for $package_manager to Aid... Development!

2006-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 09 September 2006 09:37, Chris Gianelloni wrote: There's also any SRC_URI that includes an ... last i checked, the only problem lies in the final filename itself ... so you can use encoded strings in the URL itself so long as it isnt part of the filename -mike pgpP5ZyX0xuva.pgp

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Required Features for $package_manager to Aid... Development!

2006-09-09 Thread Luca Barbato
Elfyn McBratney wrote: [snip] 1- provide a standardized api for the queries/commands (C, C++, python, perl, ruby) 2a either provide an emerge or 2b make emerge and equery use 1 and be just a front-end That way other tools won't have to be rewritten for a specific manager, advanced/experimental

[gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: New developer William L. Thomson Jr (wltjr)]

2006-09-09 Thread Bryan Østergaard
Hi all. I'm Slightly late but proud to present another addition to the hard working java team. William has been helping the java team with bug fixes and user support for quite a while and was finally made official a month ago. William hails from CA, USA and also participated in the recent Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: New developer William L. Thomson Jr (wltjr)]

2006-09-09 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Few additions ;) On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 23:29 +, Bryan Østergaard wrote: William has been helping the java team with bug fixes and user support for quite a while and was finally made official a month ago. Mostly Tomcat related stuff. William hails from CA Hailed for like 10 yrs in CA,

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer - Vlastimil Babka

2006-09-09 Thread Andrej Kacian
Dňa Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:07:02 +0100 Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] napísal: So, make sure you all welcome him onboard, and as he's Czech, I figure the beer is on him.. Uh-oh, the Czech conspiracy keeps growing! -- Ticho signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer - Vlastimil Babka

2006-09-09 Thread Jan Kundrát
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: So, make sure you all welcome him onboard, and as he's Czech, I figure the beer is on him.. Sure. Nice to know about another drinking aid. Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: New developer William L. Thomson Jr (wltjr)]

2006-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 09 September 2006 19:46, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Don't want to be misleading or anything :) aka he's a lamer -mike pgpQwrqf3hY8B.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Hi all, This is a formal notice that monolithic X is no longer supported. Developers with X-dependent packages may pull the || virtual/x11 section and retain just the modular dep list. Monolithic X will receive no further security updates, and is currently subject to at least one local security

[gentoo-dev] Re: Paid support

2006-09-09 Thread Ryan Hill
Curtis Napier wrote: I know christel is consulting with an accountant about adpot-a-dev, Now there's a project we can get behind. QA might fall a bit though. --de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: New developer William L. Thomson Jr (wltjr)]

2006-09-09 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 20:06 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 09 September 2006 19:46, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Don't want to be misleading or anything :) aka he's a lamer I bet you say that about all the guys that turn ya down ;) -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 09 September 2006 20:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote: This is a formal notice that monolithic X is no longer supported. awesome ! Developers with X-dependent packages may pull the || virtual/x11 section and retain just the modular dep list. Monolithic X will receive no further security

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Mike Frysinger wrote: so we're clear (cause i might have just missed it on irc) but there will be a meta monolithic ebuild right ? one that has all the same deps as what the current monolithic provides ? Not planning on it. There will be the xorg-x11 metabuild that provides a recommended

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 09 September 2006 22:46, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: so we're clear (cause i might have just missed it on irc) but there will be a meta monolithic ebuild right ? one that has all the same deps as what the current monolithic provides ? Not planning on it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal

2006-09-09 Thread Luca Barbato
Alec Warner wrote: So which sucks, upstream or our unbending policy? upstream for that reason us because we haven't a tool like the one BaSS wrote for the ebooks. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paid support

2006-09-09 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 18:49 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: I am just wondering, how does this affect European developers? Does this make us financially active in the US even if we work for a European company due to the fact that we are bound to Gentoo Foundation which *is* registered as a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Required Features for $package_manager to Aid... Development!

2006-09-09 Thread Alec Warner
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 21:19 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: I've been inspired by the local/global USE flag threads recently posted by Doug (Cardoe), and it got me to thinking... I've recently joined the pkgcore development effort, and was asked by

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: New developer William L. Thomson Jr (wltjr)]

2006-09-09 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:28 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 20:06 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 09 September 2006 19:46, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Don't want to be misleading or anything :) aka he's a lamer I bet you say that about all the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paid support

2006-09-09 Thread Daniel Ostrow
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 15:03 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 18:49 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: I am just wondering, how does this affect European developers? Does this make us financially active in the US even if we work for a European company due to the fact that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Paid support

2006-09-09 Thread Daniel Ostrow
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 21:23 -0700, Daniel Ostrow wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 15:03 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 18:49 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: I am just wondering, how does this affect European developers? Does this make us financially active in the US

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Mike Frysinger wrote: how about a local USE flag like all-the-junk-in-the-trunk ? Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a while than add a new option to install stuff nobody will ever run. Thanks, Donnie