[gentoo-dev] punting old glibc ebuilds

2006-09-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
since all our arches have managed to migrate to either glibc-2.3.6-r4 or glibc-2.4-r3, i'd like to go ahead and punt: glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r2.ebuild glibc-2.3.4.20040619-r2.ebuild glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1.ebuild glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1.ebuild glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r2.ebuild glibc-2.3.4.20

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-16 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:02:06PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:17:21 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` > | > environment

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:17:21 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` | > environment variable, which is defined in the profiles and which | > may be augmented o

[gentoo-dev] Re: compiz

2006-09-16 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Joshua, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Joshua Baergen schrieb: > Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: >> So Gnome 2.16 will use AIGLX in Metacity? > Not by default. The support wasn't deemed 100% yet and thus slipped to > 2.18. No problem, I can wait. V-Li -- Fi

Re: [gentoo-dev] So long (but if anyone sends me fish...)

2006-09-16 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Nathaniel McCallum wrote: Well, kloeri marked me as retired today ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34058 ). I won't fight it this time... :) Its been a while since I contributed something, and I don't see myself doing anything anytime soon. I'm available at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone

[gentoo-dev] So long (but if anyone sends me fish...)

2006-09-16 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Well, kloeri marked me as retired today ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34058 ). I won't fight it this time... :) Its been a while since I contributed something, and I don't see myself doing anything anytime soon. I'm available at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone needs anything. I wish you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: compiz

2006-09-16 Thread Joshua Baergen
Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: > So Gnome 2.16 will use AIGLX in Metacity? > Not by default. The support wasn't deemed 100% yet and thus slipped to 2.18. You can enabled it through a compiler flag, and Hanno's overlay exposes this through a USE flag. Be warned that a few people are havin

[gentoo-dev] Re: compiz

2006-09-16 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Hanno, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Hanno Böck schrieb: > Now, with the release of mesa 6.5.1 and the xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 ebuild > we have a well-working aiglx-implementation in gentoo. So Gnome 2.16 will use AIGLX in Metacity? V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381

[gentoo-dev] compiz

2006-09-16 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, Now, with the release of mesa 6.5.1 and the xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 ebuild we have a well-working aiglx-implementation in gentoo. I've now added a compiz-ebuild with patches for aiglx. I plan to add additional compiz-stuff (gset-compiz, quinn-versions of compiz etc.) soon. We could think of c

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-16 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:53 -0700 Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | On Monday 11 September 2006 15:22, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > * Otherwise, try again with ``._cfg0001_name``, then > | > ``._cfg0002_name`` and so on

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-16 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` environment > variable, which is defined in the profiles and which may be augmented or > overridden by the current environment and user configuration files. The user env

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-16 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:39:35PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:51:09 +0200 Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > Comments both on the nature and the specifics of the specification > | > would