On Wednesday 20 September 2006 23:06, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
A GLEP doesn't have to be bureaucracy. It can be nothing more than a
way of ensuring that the correct technical decisions are made. For a
project that could end up affecting a lot of people, getting the design
right and determining
# Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] (24 Sep 2006)
# masked app-crypt/hashsum for treecleaners, bug(s) 148530
# Pending Removal Oct 22th
app-crypt/hashsum
Masked as requested by Hanno Boeck [EMAIL PROTECTED].
--
Christian Heim phreak at gentoo.org
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hello all,
I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
Thanks in advance!
I think I agree with the others. Excellent idea though; thanks for
giving this issue your attention.
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Lance Albertson wrote:
From my point of view, it would have been nice to have at least been
asked what infra could do to host these tarballs down the road. That
way, we have a sound plan of doing a good release when they're ready. I
don't like the idea of them springing a release and then
Ryan Hill wrote:
Lance Albertson wrote:
From my point of view, it would have been nice to have at least been
asked what infra could do to host these tarballs down the road. That
way, we have a sound plan of doing a good release when they're ready. I
don't like the idea of them springing a
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 21:43 +, Peter wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:01:02 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
snip
Since you mentioned my name in your e-mail I figured I had something to
do with the delay on your becoming a developer, however, having
consulted bugzilla I find that this is not the case.
