Re: [gentoo-dev] How get ebuild provider virtual/category.

2006-11-10 Thread Anatoly Shipitsin
why do you care who is providing the virtual ?the entire point of virtual's is that the provider does not matter-mikeThis set default editor at run configure with flag --with-editor=/bin/nano.But if i'm not install this editor for fcron (unstable 3.0.x) configure script broke. See bug #149376.

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] local use flag cleanu p

2006-11-10 Thread arfrever
Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9 listopada 2006 22:11 napisaƂ: I've gone through some of them and here are the ones I suggest get moved to global, since the use flag description / functionality is the same or similar enough to mean support for $x: logrotate musepack xscreensaver

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking

2006-11-10 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 08:56 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: Ok, the list definitely isn't accurate. If there is a legitimate reason to mask sylpheed-claws-1.x you also have to mask it's reverse deps. However I'm still waiting for the explanation why it is on that list. (I don't mind if it's masked

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking

2006-11-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: I didn't generate the list, but my understanding was that it was intended to include all packages with a hard dep on gtk+-1, in addition to gnome 1.x. Emphasis on the first sentence below.. Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: GTK+-1 and glib-1 will not be removed at this

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: games-fps/ut2004-domain2049

2006-11-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
It's broken. There's a supposed fix, but many people say the fix doesn't work for them. Upstream has been gone forever. Anyway, I'm removing it December 10th unless someone else wants to fix the problems with it *and* port it to the games-mods eclass. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering