[gentoo-dev] Re: /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc

2006-11-26 Thread Wiktor Wandachowicz
Sven Köhler skoehler at upb.de writes: Hi, i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules and 60-fuse.rules. The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't they? So that is _very_, _very_ unpractical, because the older your gentoo gets, the

Re: [gentoo-dev] New maintainers needed for packages

2006-11-26 Thread Charlie Shepherd
On 21/11/06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: app-text/txt2man (low maintenance) I'll take this... -- -Charlie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc

2006-11-26 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Drake wrote: Sven Köhler wrote: Have you ever thought about sollutions of that problem? It's not a real problem, that these files are orphaned - but they are neither removed nor renamed, so they stay in place and in one or the other way,

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-26 Thread Christian Heim
It is my pleasure to announce that Alexander pappy Gabert is returning from retirement to battle the hardened bugs. Retired sometime in 2004, he is now again interested in being blessed with a @gentoo.org email address. Nowadays he lives in Trier, Germany and is reaching his thirties. That's

[gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Alexander Gabert (pappy) returns from retirement

2006-11-26 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Tach Petteri, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Petteri Räty schrieb: It is my pleasure to announce that Alexander pappy Gabert is returning from retirement to battle the hardened bugs. Retired sometime in 2004, he is now again interested in being blessed with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Make 'nls' use flag more generic

2006-11-26 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 26 November 2006 13:24, Charlie Shepherd wrote: The description for the nls use flag is currently 'Adds Native Language Support (using gettext - GNU locale utilities)'. However, in bug 137297, the kde herd would like to pull in kde-i18n from kde-meta, And *how* KDE is using those

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Make 'nls' use flag more generic

2006-11-26 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:17:39PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Sunday 26 November 2006 13:24, Charlie Shepherd wrote: The description for the nls use flag is currently 'Adds Native Language Support (using gettext - GNU locale utilities)'. However, in bug 137297, the kde herd

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Make 'nls' use flag more generic

2006-11-26 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 26 November 2006 16:46, Harald van Dijk wrote: It's using gettext? Maybe I'm just clueless (very well possible), but I was under the impression that KDE had its own internal language handling. It uses gettext's format, with gettext's utilities for building the .po files in .mo, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Make 'nls' use flag more generic

2006-11-26 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 04:45:59PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:17:39PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Sunday 26 November 2006 13:24, Charlie Shepherd wrote: The description for the nls use flag is currently 'Adds Native Language Support (using

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited

2006-11-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 18 November 2006 02:53, Marius Mauch wrote: Anyone interested in this feature should review the attached version. i've come to the party a bit late ... i cant seem to divine the answer to my question from reading this thread and the GLEP and the bugzilla, so perhaps someone can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement: New(ish) eclass pax-utils.eclass

2006-11-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 24 November 2006 11:16, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: Although I committed it originally almost a year ago, it hasn't been used yet, so if there's anything fundamentally wrong with whole thing, now is the time say as it can be removed with impunity. some suggestions: you should use $@

[gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml

2006-11-26 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Tach,0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) dev-scheme/guile-pg scheme dev-scheme/kawa scheme dev-scheme/mzscheme scheme Done. V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3 http://www.gnupg.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing

[gentoo-dev] [treecleaner] Last rites: net-p2p/gtkhx

2006-11-26 Thread Steve Dibb
# Deprecated: upstream dead, unsupported, doesn't compile anymore. # Pending removal Dec 26 # See #146571 net-p2p/gtkhx -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] [treecleaner] package removals

2006-11-26 Thread Steve Dibb
# Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14 Oct 2006) # masking media-radio/xastir for treecleaners, bug(s) 109695 # Pending removal 14th November 2006 media-radio/xastir # Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14 Oct 2006) # masking media-libs/gltt for treecleaners, bug(s) 145969 # Pending removal 14th

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited

2006-11-26 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:07:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there a way in the new GLEP to say never bother me with any license bullcrap ? i made sure the current check_license() function respected the idea of * so that i can put this in my make.conf: ACCEPT_LICENSES=*

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited

2006-11-26 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:03:08 -0500 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is used to mask the package, correct. When a package is masked, it gives the output of the license, or, if the license it too large (I think Marius set it at 20K) informs the user to read the license file. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCEPT_LICENSE revisited

2006-11-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 26 November 2006 18:38, Marius Mauch wrote: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there a way in the new GLEP to say never bother me with any license bullcrap ? i made sure the current check_license() function respected the idea of * so that i can put this in my make.conf:

[gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES to cut the excess in portage

2006-11-26 Thread Ryan Hill
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can those flags be used in dependencies ? Not as far as I know. They're FEATURES, not flags, and are global. Let's say, some package needs certain tools (ie. TeX) for building its documentation, it would be stupid to build the whole docs and so

[gentoo-dev] Re: spamc standalone package

2006-11-26 Thread Ryan Hill
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is anyone else working on an standalone spamc package ? I've got several machines where I don't want to have the whole spamassassin installed - they're just calling an remote machine to do this work. Sounds like a good question for the Networking forum

[gentoo-dev] [treecleaner] Last rites: media-libs/jpeg-mmx

2006-11-26 Thread Steve Dibb
# Upstream wants it dead, we want it dead, it's time to die. # Pending removal Dec 26 2006, bug 156373 media-libs/jpeg-mmx -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list