Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
My main issue is with size. Right now portage has to pull ALL the packages in
the PORTAGE_BINHOST to create the dep tree. Is there a way for me to say:
emerge -u --use-bynary-packages-if-possible system and portage will build the
dep tree based on the local portage
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:54:24PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
This is tentatively scheduled to start at 02h00 UTC on 6th January 2007.
I am estimating 3 hours for all of it, but I hope to have it done is
less than that.
And we're done!
Some delays were experienced getting it up (total
Hello,
Is there any reason why not setting latest as default for WANT_AUTO*
variables?
I believe that an ebuild should set these variables only if there is
some exception.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 06 January 2007 05:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Is there any reason why not setting latest as default for WANT_AUTO*
variables?
I believe that an ebuild should set these variables only if there is
some exception.
that seems like a not-too-shabby idea actually
-mike
pgp7qE8JnVb2f.pgp
We have created the overlay, hosting it on sourceforge:
http://gentoo-gis.sourceforge.net/
Can it be added to Layman default list?
Thanks
Luca
On 12/6/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luca Casagrande wrote:
Hi to all!
I am a user of geographic information system (GIS) on
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 12:27:31AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
And we're done!
Thanks to myself, kingtaco, ramereth, solar, jforman and cshields for
all playing a part of getting this together so far!
A special thank you to our sponsor GNi (gni.com) for the hardware.
I hear there will
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:21:48 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 06 January 2007 05:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Is there any reason why not setting latest as default for
WANT_AUTO* variables?
I believe that an ebuild should set these variables only if there is
some
On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Is there any reason why not setting latest as default for WANT_AUTO*
variables?
Because then stuff will magically work in stable, and break in ~arch, and
you won't know why it's happening.
Instead if you follow the procedure (set the
On Saturday 06 January 2007 09:47, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 06 January 2007 05:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Is there any reason why not setting latest as default for
WANT_AUTO* variables?
I believe that an ebuild should set these variables
On Saturday 06 January 2007 10:22, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Is there any reason why not setting latest as default for WANT_AUTO*
variables?
Because then stuff will magically work in stable, and break in ~arch, and
you won't
On Saturday 06 January 2007 16:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what does it matter if all of the ebuilds declare latest or the eclass
declares latest ?
Weren't we going to allow declaring 1.10 1.9 soon, so that we could stop
using latest ?
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò -
Robert Buchholz wrote:
But I had the impression the idea was discarded anyway. So I should
focus my thoughts somewhere else :-)
Please focus your thoughts wherever you wish. I gotta ask tho; what idea?
I thought we were just talking about excess dependencies in the tree.
I somehow lost
On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Saturday 06 January 2007 16:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what does it matter if all of the ebuilds declare latest or the eclass
declares latest ?
Weren't we going to allow declaring 1.10 1.9 soon, so that we could stop
Ryan Hill wrote:
Robert Buchholz wrote:
I don't want to sound negative and I like the idea a lot, but two things
are on my mind about this:
It should also sync with changes in the tree, like package removals,
additions and package moves.
For sure.
When you're talking about it on
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
My idea for the second way is basically to make the life of tools easier.
It would make explicit that someone accepting GPL-3, but not GPL-2 would
be able to accept a GPL-2 and later license.
Ah, I see what I'm missing- you're saying a tool could just check for the
Having read the other thread, I have to agree that the N+ approach is
better, as you could have GPL3+ as well with simple parsing.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Steve Long wrote:
maybe, but no one has this as the default behavior, so ...
-mike
Yeah, but it's still a good idea, as others have discussed.
Just wanted to apologise for my rudeness there- after all it was your
proposal in the first place. Just been a bit strung out recently, so please
On Saturday 06 January 2007 18:25, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the reason was so in the *eclass* you could translate latest to 1.10 1.9
and drop the need of executing that helper function in local scope
Right, but I thought the other one, too..
Well, I suppose it would do little harm at this point to
As per summary, this is a last rites message for jmode.
It's an IME engine that still uses GTK+ 1.2 (we all know what that means), and
that was last touched to fix something useful - beside the einfo - elog move
yesterday - on 2004-11-23, by usata, adding the following postinst message:
On Saturday 06 January 2007 13:32, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Saturday 06 January 2007 19:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
why not just get rid of the idea of latest ? is there a scenario where
autotools would be inherited but not actually used/added to DEPEND ? i
guess that's what this
Copying from my latest blog post, to let the news be spread without surprises:
--
This is a very sad blog by my side, although I hope this can be cleared up
soon so that I don’t have to be this sad anymore in the future.
Basically, the public Gentoo/FreeBSD development is officially halted
is it possible for dodoc to do a `make doc' (or whatever the standard is) if
called without any filenames?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Alec Warner wrote:
Talk to solar about binhost, I know he has a better implementation lying
around; it's a matter of finalizing it ;)
solar: where is it on your site?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
if u need help with the clean room stuff, give me a shout. when i meet a
coder i really respect, i tell them i'm a clean-room engineer. only then.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 07 January 2007 00:13, Steve Long wrote:
is it possible for dodoc to do a `make doc' (or whatever the standard is)
there is no such standard
-mike
pgpDj99We5oHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 00:13, Steve Long wrote:
is it possible for dodoc to do a `make doc' (or whatever the standard is)
there is no such standard
-mike
well are there any general usage examples? i've just had to amend an ebuild
so that it did make doc, and i
26 matches
Mail list logo
