On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:41:56 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:40 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | What is the best way to handle packages that require parts of
| | tr1? The options
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
bringing it up to 3.3MBytes of code, about 3.2MBytes of which is
compiler bug workarounds and boost-review-process-induced mutual
masturbation.
So the safest route is either bundle boost (that is heavy as you shown
in detail) and/or just depend on it at least for now.
On 30.01.2007, at 09:36, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch to
| system on at configure time as done for other libs?
At something like five megs of code per application?
If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like minimal?
Philipp
--
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:36:35 +0200 Philipp Riegger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 30.01.2007, at 09:36, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
|
| | * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch
| | to system on at configure time as done for other libs?
|
| At something like five megs of
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 06:27 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
[ Background: tr1 is a set of extensions to the C++ Standard Library
giving various useful things like hash tables and smart pointers. There
are partial implementations included in g++-4.1 and boost and full
implementations available
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:49:48 +0100
Matthias Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't it possible to check the version of gcc that is in _use_ in an
ebuild, like i can do in a configure script? if so, one could provide a
old-gcc use flag that must be enabled when trying to build with
gcc-4.1.0
On 30.01.2007, at 11:40, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch
| | to system on at configure time as done for other libs?
|
| At something like five megs of code per application?
|
| If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like
* Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
* Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that =4.1 is being used
even if it's installed.
I don't think these are necessarily compatible. tr1 is implemented in the
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 30
Jan 2007 16:49:51 +0100:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:49:48 +0100
Matthias Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't it possible to check the version of gcc that is in _use_ in an
ebuild, like i can do in a
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Jan 30 2007, 12:27:49AM CST]
* Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
Agreed. Worse, it's a stop-gap measure, since presumably the long term
solution is for tr1 to be supported directly by the compiler on all
archs. So, any work done with this approach
I have a few suggestions for the make_desktop_entry function in
eutils.eclass:
1 - Allow me to pass in a full application path. If you pass in the
full path to an executable as the first argument, it comes up with a
crazy filename like this:
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 16:10, Jim Ramsay wrote:
In other words, I propose that this function should probably do
'basename' on $exec before using it for the .desktop filename.
no ... the point of using $exec is to make sure the .desktop file is unique
i'll change it to sanitize the filename
Sometimes a package has to depend on a specific version of a slotted package
being the active one to build correctly, like in the current tr1 discussion
on -dev [1] or with packages that depend on the running kernel.
Currently this isn't really possible, however I while ago I got an idea how to
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
Sometimes a package has to depend on a specific version of a
slotted package being the active one to build correctly, like in
the current tr1 discussion on -dev [1] or with packages that
depend on the running kernel.
tr1 is
Marius Mauch wrote:
Sometimes a package has to depend on a specific version of a slotted package
being the active one to build correctly, like in the current tr1
discussion on -dev [1] or with packages that depend on the running kernel.
Currently this isn't really possible, however I while
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:25:31 -0800
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
Sometimes a package has to depend on a specific version of a
slotted package being the active one to build correctly, like in
the current tr1 discussion
16 matches
Mail list logo
