[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-misc/gfontview

2007-04-08 Thread Stefan Schweizer
»Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 070407 Stefan Schweizer wrote: # masked for removal: no release since 2001, build broken, bug 154671 app-misc/gfontview I have added a comment to the bug. If you want to remove this package, please provide a

[gentoo-dev] Re: Tears of unfathomable sorrow

2007-04-08 Thread Steve Long
Alec Warner wrote: I expect to still file patches for portage and I expect to hang out in gentoo-dev-help on irc and I expect to mentor for this years summer of code. I might be wrong, but my impression is you can't do that without being a dev. So how about just hanging on til end of summer?

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Jeffrey Gardner
Michael Cummings wrote: So, fellow devs, what's new with development? As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of: dev-java/ant-core dev-java/ant-contrib dev-java/commons-cli dev-java/itext

Re: [Off-topic] Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 14:38 -0700, Steven De Bock wrote: Hi, I really like the way where this mailinglist is heading with this topic. I subscribed to this mailing list a while ago with the hope to read more stuff like this, rather than all those rants from the previous days. I've already

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 19:16 +0100, George Prowse wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 09:45 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: Here is what I'm doing these days.. Let's see. I'm currently leading the 2007.0 release, which includes building LiveDVD releases for

Re: [gentoo-dev] resolvconf

2007-04-08 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:57:18 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roy Marples wrote: A new version of resolvconf-gentoo is about to be released which also works with dash and busybox. Also, the next resolvconf script for dnsmasq will (also due out soon) supports updating dnsmasq

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-db/c-jdbc

2007-04-08 Thread Petteri Räty
+# Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] (08 Apr 2007) +# Still generation 1 and we are one major version behind +# 30 days and in junkyard unless someone expresses a need +# for this package. Do it in: +# https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157427 +dev-db/c-jdbc + signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Rémi Cardona
Petteri Räty a écrit : Rémi Cardona kirjoitti: Oh and I'm working on an updated gnome2 eclass, as the current one reads data in /var/db. Fixing this should fix gnome/xfce packages for paludis users among other benefits. If anyone wants to fix env saving in portage, it would help us a lot :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tears of unfathomable sorrow

2007-04-08 Thread Raúl Porcel
Alec Warner wrote: Much to the joy of many I am now retiring from Gentoo. I've already done most of the work (sorry to burden you kloeri I think just the tree-bits are left). Many will wonder why; but this has been a while in coming. I don't get along with many like I used to and in many

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Raúl Porcel
Michael Cummings wrote: So, fellow devs, what's new with development? For those interested, genlop has migrated into gentoo as a project with the permission of upstream, which no longer maintain it. Um...any new tools or projects people are working on? Anyone? I'm currently fixing all the

[gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

2007-04-08 Thread Michael Cummings
Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested users filing bugs, so genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release based on what was open in bugs.gentoo.org. Enjoy :) -- -o()o--

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Joseph Jezak
Michael Cummings wrote: When you pop into your mail client of choice and find 50+ unread messages in the last few hours, you know what kind of day [EMAIL PROTECTED] is having. Don't suppose we could get on with that silly topical thing of development? Surely there's a usenet channel where

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tears of unfathomable sorrow

2007-04-08 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Hi. Alec Warner wrote: Much to the joy of many I am now retiring from Gentoo. I've already done most of the work (sorry to burden you kloeri I think just the tree-bits are left). I, for one, have no joy in seeing you leave. Many will wonder why; but this has been a while in coming. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Joseph Jezak wrote: I like this thread! Indeed! This thread is fun - and fun is what Gentoo should be about. The PPC team had a bugday yesterday and managed to get almost 70 bugs off of our list of open issues! Thanks to nixnut, mabi, dertobi123 and ndansmith for helping to clean up the bug

Re: [Off-topic] Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 09:19 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: I think we all should do our part in asking people to keep things on topic, and for discussions to move to the proper lists. If it isn't about development, it doesn't belong here. Yes and at min, if it does go off topic and remains

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Roy Wright
Jeffrey Gardner wrote: Michael Cummings wrote: So, fellow devs, what's new with development? As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of: dev-java/ant-core dev-java/ant-contrib

[gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
working here is no longer fun; the following are up for maintainer grabs ... drop me a line if something interests you app-benchmarks/nbench sys-power/nvram-wakeup sys-power/nvram-reboot sys-power/athcool sys-process/runit sys-process/minit sys-process/schedutils sys-process/acct sys-process/atop

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:58:17 Jeffrey Gardner wrote: Michael Cummings wrote: So, fellow devs, what's new with development? As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of: ..but finding sources I can

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Petteri Räty
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: working here is no longer fun; the following are up for maintainer grabs ... drop me a line if something interests you So you are looking to remove these things from the base-system herd or new people to join the herd? Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: working here is no longer fun; the following are up for maintainer grabs ... drop me a line if something interests you So you are looking to remove these things from the base-system herd or new people to join the herd?

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Timothy Redaelli
Alle domenica 08 aprile 2007, Mike Frysinger ha scritto: working here is no longer fun; the following are up for maintainer grabs ... drop me a line if something interests you net-misc/netkit-rsh I know it very well (patches are mine) so I can maintain it. Happy Easter to .* :) -- Timothy

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Mike Frysinger wrote: sys-apps/byld sys-apps/yard sys-apps/mkinitrd app-admin/superadduser I can probably pick these up if nobody else wants them. sys-boot/syslinux And this, but a bit less interested... Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: sys-apps/byld sys-apps/yard sys-apps/mkinitrd app-admin/superadduser I can probably pick these up if nobody else wants them. sys-boot/syslinux And this, but a bit less interested... Thanks,

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: sys-apps/byld sys-apps/yard sys-apps/mkinitrd app-admin/superadduser I can probably pick these up if nobody else wants them. three of those should be a cake walk ... mkinitrd is a friggin mess though, so after you

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:20 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:58:17 Jeffrey Gardner wrote: ..but finding sources I can use for the following jars has been kicking my butt: Acme.jar The entire Acme package is here:-

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-04-08 23h59 UTC

2007-04-08 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-04-08 23h59 UTC. Removals: games-board/pysol-cardsets 2007-04-02 19:31:27 tupone net-news/hellanzb 2007-04-05 18:37:26 aballier x11-misc/klineakconfig

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Robin H. Johnson
I'm one of the folks on the base-system alias already, but here's the key stuff that I interact with, and some other related notes. Put me down for the following: sys-process/supervise-scripts sys-apps/smartmontools sys-apps/sg3_utils sys-apps/dmidecode sys-apps/ethtool

[gentoo-dev] Re: base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Ryan Hill
Mike Frysinger wrote: working here is no longer fun * HUGZ * -- where to now? if i had to guess dirtyepic gentoo orgi'm afraid to say antarctica's next 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing

[gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d

2007-04-08 Thread Marcelo Góes
Hello, I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d. As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is 1) cleaner and easier to read 2) more portable (for systems that use something other than /etc/env.d, for example)

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote: sys-apps/mii-diag Can this one just go away? Is there anything that it does that ethtool doesn't do? yeah, newer net-tools integrates this package sys-libs/nss-db My name should be on this one already. i specifically checked because i

Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d

2007-04-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote: As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d` Does it make sense to allow both styles? not really Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? yes please -mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-08 Thread Jeffrey Gardner
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:20 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:58:17 Jeffrey Gardner wrote: ..but finding sources I can use for the following jars has been kicking my butt: Acme.jar The entire Acme package is here:-