Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Show me name calling and/or insulting behavior.
If you want a list of *that*, look at 134852. But we were discussing
Jakub's contributions, not Jakub's bad behaviour.
I think this is a much more representative example of Jakub's
On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage than test.
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
On 4/20/07, Rob C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
keywording/stablingin my eyes this is sufficient.
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a weekly
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage
Ciaran, Steve,
I think i made it clear this subthread needs to be left alone here and
moved to a better place (if any) as already explained here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48164/focus=48271
So please stop it, both of you.
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas
Rob C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect
by default would do a lot more good at this stage than test.
Arch teams normally have collision-protect
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
keywording/stablingin my eyes this is sufficient.
V-Li
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 20:04 +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Aggelos Orfanakos (also known as
agorf on IRC), our latest addition joining the Ruby herd and the GWN
translators (he has already worked on the Greek GWN translations for
quite some time).
Welcome!
On 20-04-2007 08:22:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
does anyone actually find this useful ? i think ive used the value in there
like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked just as well) ...
otherwise, from my perspective:
- it causes annoying bogus hunks in diffs
- not
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 08:22:42AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
does anyone actually find this useful ? i think ive used the value in there
like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked just as well) ...
otherwise, from my perspective:
- it causes annoying bogus hunks in diffs
Welcome Aggy!
Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once Aggy isn't around computers, he finds time to enjoy swimming (/me
winks
at dad eryof), table tennis, photography, astronomy and listening to music.
I challenge you to a match of table tennis. Now come over here and beat
me! No,
On Friday 20 of April 2007 14:22:42 Mike Frysinger wrote:
does anyone actually find this useful ? i think ive used the value in
there like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked just as well)
... otherwise, from my perspective:
- it causes annoying bogus hunks in diffs
- not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Welcome Aggy!
Matti Bickel wrote:
Welcome Aggy!
Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once Aggy isn't around computers, he finds time to enjoy swimming (/me
winks
at dad eryof), table tennis, photography, astronomy and listening to music.
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:52:46 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20-04-2007 15:45:00 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I use it to make deltas of changes made in the tree, and apply
those deltas on the overlay I'm using. Without $Header: $ there
I have no way to actually see
Mike Frysinger wrote:
does anyone actually find this useful ? i think ive used the value in there
like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked just as well) ...
otherwise, from my perspective:
- it causes annoying bogus hunks in diffs
- not uncommon for people to contact me as
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 08:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
does anyone actually find this useful ?
yes quite useful.
i think ive used the value in there
like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked just as well) ...
otherwise, from my perspective:
- it causes annoying bogus
On 20-04-2007 09:11:10 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:52:46 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the info you need in CVS/ ?
That requires:
a) an up-to-date CVS tree checkout
b) a CVS tree (not a regular rsynced one)
c) parsing of the CVS/Entries
Fabian Groffen kirjoitti:
On 20-04-2007 08:22:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
does anyone actually find this useful ? i think ive used the value in there
like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked just as well) ...
otherwise, from my perspective:
- it causes annoying bogus
On 4/20/07, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Aggelos Orfanakos (also known as
agorf on IRC), our latest addition joining the Ruby herd and the GWN
translators (he has already worked on the Greek GWN translations for
quite some time).
Welcome! Ruby
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 11:52 +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Christina (Chrissy) Fullam (also know as
musikc on IRC) our latest addition joining Developer relations, more precise
conflict resolution and will probably join Chris' GWN minions.
Welcome!!
does anyone actually find this useful ? i think ive used the value in there
like once (when in reality a `md5sum` would have worked just as well) ...
otherwise, from my perspective:
- it causes annoying bogus hunks in diffs
- not uncommon for people to contact me as the maintainer because i'm
# Michael Sterrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20 Apr 2007)
# masked for removal in May
# No reply from maintainer on bug #169198
# Uses old Manifest format.
app-emulation/vmware-gsx-console
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage
Christian Heim wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Christina (Chrissy) Fullam (also know as
musikc on IRC) our latest addition joining Developer relations, more precise
conflict resolution and will probably join Chris' GWN minions.
Christina is joining us from Greenville, SC (that's
On 20/04/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect
by
On 20/04/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are
not acting as you describe.
Can you provide some bug numbers to backup this claim?
Matthias
--
[EMAIL
I thought about it some longer, and it's even nastier than just having
to get the value in a different way, because you also have to keep the
value in the file in your local version. This either means also
storing the CVS directory (in SVN, funny :) ) or devoting the first line
of every file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Langer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are
not acting as you describe.
Can you
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 19:56 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Langer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:06 +0200, Rob C wrote:
Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a
weekly basis. So either this
Alle venerdì 20 aprile 2007, Fabian Groffen ha scritto:
On 20-04-2007 15:45:00 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I use it to make deltas of changes made in the tree, and apply those
deltas on the overlay I'm using. Without $Header: $ there I have no
way to actually see which version I'm
You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to
revoke this license now.
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 23:05 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey everyone :-)
Infra told me to go ahead and email this around, so here it
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:26:08 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to
revoke this license now.
Hmm, it was sent to both lists, looks intended to me, besides that,
here's a snippet from the original email:
Feel
free to share
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to
revoke this license now.
Nah, read closely:
Feel free to share the license key with anyone interested or post it on
the
web. The license allows any number
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That was my intention, since it's public for everyone.
- From the email I got it looks like they want me to share it, and spread
the word ;-)
Bjarke
Ned Ludd wrote:
You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to
revoke this
Yeah KingTaco pointed that out on IRC.
Sorry for any confusion.
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 23:50 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That was my intention, since it's public for everyone.
- From the email I got it looks like they want me to share
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Once all but the last arch has keyworded said package, it is acceptable
and proper for a bug wrangler and/or maintainer/herd to re-assign the
bug to the last remaining arch and they remove that arch from CC. They
should add their herd/maintainer to the CC of the bug.
On Friday 20 April 2007, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
Hey everyone :-)
*cough* bad cross-poster *cough*
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 17:33 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Or even just some way
to differentiate CCed archs from CCed randompeoples.
You probably need to emerge eyeballs and enable them with the look
command. After the look command gets the input, you'll need to parse it
with the think subroutine,
39 matches
Mail list logo
