Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Matti Bickel
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I shall contemplate fiercely on building my own herd of nightly bloodsuckers, zombies and cannibals. I don't know whether to call it 'postnuclear-vampirism' or just plain 'satanism' yet. I'm interested. Will you bring back xmms? Will your program include

[PROCTORS] Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote: and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or into the open flame, only conservapedia is real,... This certainly is an interesting first post to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Jan Kundrát
Robin H. Johnson wrote: In terms of implementing this in the DTD, I'm going to specify that 'contact=1' (or whatever name we settle on) is the default, so that we don't break validation of any existing metadata: !ATTLIST maintainer contact (0|1) 1 -- should this maintainer be used

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-27 Thread Dawid Węgliński
Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:02 -0600 Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sweet. Are you gonna bring back those Gentoo icons that mysteriously disappeared? :) The ones with the copyright problems? I'm out of topic i think. Could you amplify, please? --

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-27 Thread Jakub Moc
On 4/27/07, Dawid Węgliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:02 -0600 Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sweet. Are you gonna bring back those Gentoo icons that mysteriously disappeared? :) The ones with the copyright problems? I'm out of

[gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:24:18 +0200: On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400 Josh Sled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If that's the case, might not humanities be a better name? E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do

[gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-27 Thread Duncan
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:16:26 -0700: As no one was actually fixing any of the remaining bugs that were reported, what were the kernel developers supposed to do, just sit around and wait another week for no reason? I wasn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-27 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It would be nice if there where some CD/DVD labels created, that people could print and put on their LiveCDs/InstallCDs :-) Bjarke Dawid Węgliński skrev: Hi there As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I have just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-27 Thread Petteri Räty
Daniel Drake kirjoitti: This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this will obviously be delayed, but do keep this date in mind. Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:25:01 +0200, Duncan wrote: It's a very good question, it was posed at the time, it was never answered and at last we can now say it was almost completely ignored. I (and I expect others who know) didn't answer this before, as it would have been too easy to start

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Steffen Brumm
... and if it's more convenient for them in a theology herd, why should it be a problem for those not interested in the package?  It might raise a few eyebrows here or there, but if it's being well maintained,   that is the problem, because what is theology? only christianity, only islam? i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Our profiles/updates handling is not smart enough

2007-04-27 Thread Marius Mauch
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:00:18 +0300 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ grep javahelp -r /usr/portage/profiles/updates/ /usr/portage/profiles/updates/3Q-2004:move dev-java/javahelp dev-java/javahelp-bin Well nowadays Sun has put javahelp under GPL so now we have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread expose
Robin H. Johnson wrote: [...] the attribute should only indicate if the maintainer entry should be used for any automatic process at all, not how to use it. Oh, I thought you were talking about the name of the variable. I intend that the first non-excluded maintainer entry is the one used

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/jcs-bin

2007-04-27 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
+# Krzysiek Pawlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] (27 Apr 2007) +# Mask binary-only version of jcs, please use dev-java/jcs, +# will be removed from the tree around end of May. +dev-java/jcs-bin + end of May is 27 of May ;) -- Krzysiek Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xBC51 desktop-misc,

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-27 Thread Timothy Redaelli
Jakub Moc ha scritto: On 4/27/07, Dawid Węgliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:02 -0600 Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sweet. Are you gonna bring back those Gentoo icons that mysteriously disappeared? :) The ones with the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer -- - The herd field is not used. - The maintainer address is used

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Jakub Moc
On 4/27/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: It should take devaway into account. why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into account is pointless in my opinion as it

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:56:44 +0200 Matti Bickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I shall contemplate fiercely on building my own herd of nightly bloodsuckers, zombies and cannibals. I don't know whether to call it 'postnuclear-vampirism' or just plain

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-27 Thread Daniel Drake
Petteri Räty wrote: Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention that as a reason in your post. At last check this was a recommendation, not a policy, plus nobody objected timeframe-wise before.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-27 Thread Daniel Drake
Duncan wrote: I'm running (vanilla) rc7-git10 ATM, and have two possible regressions remaining here If reproducible on gentoo-soures-2.6.21, please file bug reports for them or they will get lost. Daniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-27 Thread Petteri Räty
Daniel Drake kirjoitti: Petteri Räty wrote: Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention that as a reason in your post. At last check this was a recommendation, not a policy, plus nobody

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 22:01 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:33:50AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable). notification=assignment|cc|none ? This is to answer expose's question as well, but the attribute

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-27 Thread Alec Warner
Petteri Räty wrote: Daniel Drake kirjoitti: Petteri Räty wrote: Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention that as a reason in your post. At last check this was a recommendation, not a policy,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-27 Thread Duncan
Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:00:41 -0400: Duncan wrote: I'm running (vanilla) rc7-git10 ATM, and have two possible regressions remaining here If reproducible on gentoo-soures-2.6.21, please file bug reports for them or

Re: [gentoo-dev] That time again...

2007-04-27 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 20:12 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: Any other cool updates in the last few weeks? (it's been 20 days since the last time I started this thread - at this rate, we might make enough input to make Chris' job on the gwn easier). For Gnome, 2.18.1 is almost entirely in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Jan Kundr?t wrote: AFAIK the preferred way of specifying boolean values in XML is to use contact=contact, not contact=1. I can't find this described anywhere in the XML specification http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ Have you got a reference for it?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:57:27AM -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: In light of the above, how about 'automatic=0'? Please keep with your original idea of letting maintainers opt out vs some of the ideas proposed in this thread where maintainers have to opt in as I'm sure the metadata.xml files wont be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Dominique Michel
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:59:25 +0200, Alexandre Buisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:25:01 +0200, Duncan wrote: It's a very good question, it was posed at the time, it was never answered and at last we can now say it was almost completely ignored. I (and I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Matti Bickel
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Taking into account the other reasonable input, how about the name of attribute 'automatic-bug' ? I would like assign somewhere in the name, but i'd be fine with your proposal as well. -- Regards, Matti Bickel Encrypted/Signed Email preferred

Re: [gentoo-dev] That time again...

2007-04-27 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Michael Cummings wrote: Worth a shot, it seemed to work last time (and I just noticed that a neglected -dev mail folder is a bad thing). We're working on getting X.Org 7.2 stable. The hot new stuff, video hotplugging et al, is in xorg-server 1.3 and xf86-video-i810 2.0. Other drivers remain

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Jan Kundrát
Robin H. Johnson wrote: Have you got a reference for it? That's how it is in XHTML, so I thought it's common practice in XML as well. That probably isn't true, so sorry for noise. Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Drake Wyrm
Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote: and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or into the open flame, only conservapedia is real,... This

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Drake Wyrm wrote: Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote: and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or into the open flame, only conservapedia is

Re: [gentoo-dev] That time again...

2007-04-27 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Donnie Berkholz wrote: Michael Cummings wrote: Worth a shot, it seemed to work last time (and I just noticed that a neglected -dev mail folder is a bad thing). We're working on getting X.Org 7.2 stable. The hot new stuff, video hotplugging et al, is in xorg-server 1.3 and xf86-video-i810

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Josh Saddler
Steve Dibb wrote: Dominique Michel wrote: I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will include both religious and scientific softwares. No worries, app-misc/gramps was dropped from the theology herd, and is herdless once again. It's interesting that people are up