Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:23:58 -0400 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename. app-vim/ant Policy says to go with upstream's naming. This is, after all, why we have categories. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP

[gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Duncan
Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 16 May 2007 13:48:35 -0400: I have no problem waiting for 2007.1, if Gnome and KDE don't mind. I don't know what hackery has to take place to do that, but I'm sure someone out there does. What sort of timing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name

2007-05-17 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Jakub Moc wrote: On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename. app-vim/ant and app-vim/sudo and app-xemacs/emerge, g But (X)Emacs was first. It had emerge in 1992 already. :P ;; LCD Archive Entry: ;; emerge|Dale R. Worley|[EMAIL PROTECTED] ;;

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Rumen Yotov
Duncan написа: Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 16 May 2007 13:48:35 -0400: I have no problem waiting for 2007.1, if Gnome and KDE don't mind. I don't know what hackery has to take place to do that, but I'm sure someone out there does. What

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name

2007-05-17 Thread Raúl Porcel
Blame drobbins :P -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Rémi Cardona
Rumen Yotov wrote: Hi, Might i sugest making an doc expat-upgrade and posting it in Docs (or some dev's space). This only for those who can't wait and want earlier upgrade. Even can participate in making it, if needed. Three easy steps: 1) unmask it 2) revdep-rebuild 3) profit ! Really, out

[gentoo-dev] 'stricter' FEATURE and poor programming practices notice

2007-05-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
Hi, I've had the 'stricter' FEATURE turned on for some time and found that many packages failed due to the QA notice regarding poor programming practices. I filed a few bugs for this but have not gotten a lot of response, or the suggestion to talk to upstream. Obviously the latter is always a

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'stricter' FEATURE and poor programming practices notice

2007-05-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:12:01 +0200 Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My view is that if this is a QA notice then, if a package doesn't emerge because of it, it is a Gentoo QA bug and package maintainers should be responsible for fixing it. Gentoo should not be applying patches simply to

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Le Zhang (r0bertz)

2007-05-17 Thread Christian Heim
It's my please to introduce to you Le Robert Zhang (also known as r0bertz on IRC), our latest addition joining the GWN Translators. Le is joining us from Hong Kong (yes, that's in China boys and girls) where he's currently working for Thizlinux (a Hong Kong based Linux company). When Le isn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 08:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2007 17:23:58 -0400 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename. app-vim/ant Policy says to go with upstream's naming. This is, after all, why we have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:59:09 -0400 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Policy says to go with upstream's naming. This is, after all, why we have categories. Sure, and along those lines upstream seems to call it ant_menu or ant_menu.vim :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Le Zhang (r0bertz)

2007-05-17 Thread Zhang Le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Heim : It's my please to introduce to you Le Robert Zhang (also known as r0bertz on IRC), our latest addition joining the GWN Translators. Thanks to all of you who have helped in the process of mentoring and recuiting me! You can just

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Le Zhang (r0bertz)

2007-05-17 Thread Zhang Le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Heim wrote: It's my please to introduce to you Le Robert Zhang (also known as r0bertz on IRC), our latest addition joining the GWN Translators. Thanks to all of you who have helped in the process of mentoring and recuiting me! You can

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Le Zhang (r0bertz)

2007-05-17 Thread Anant Narayanan
Christian Heim wrote: It's my please to introduce to you Le Robert Zhang (also known as r0bertz on IRC), our latest addition joining the GWN Translators. Oriental! A warm welcome to Gentoo, Zhang Le Robert :) -- Anant -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:59:09 -0400 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Policy says to go with upstream's naming. This is, after all, why we have categories. Sure, and along those lines upstream seems to call it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:48:11 -0400 William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=155 Not for the versions in the tree they don't. You mean 0.5.3 released 2003-12-28. IMHO that borderlines a stale package or one that should be punted. Or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread Josh Sled
On Thu, May 17, 2007 12:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: 'Twas added to the tree at user request. Given that Java's basically a dead language and only being used for legacy applications now, it's I'm having a hard time trying to figure out how you justify calling Java a dead language. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josh Sled wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2007 12:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: 'Twas added to the tree at user request. Given that Java's basically a dead language and only being used for legacy applications now, it's I'm having a hard time trying to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Le Zhang (r0bertz)

2007-05-17 Thread Davide Cendron
Il Thursday 17 May 2007 16:49:02 Christian Heim ha scritto: It's my please to introduce to you Le Robert Zhang (also known as r0bertz on IRC), our latest addition joining the GWN Translators. Welcome aboard, Zhang Le! 8) ... and good GWN translations! ;-) Cheers, -- Davide Cendron Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:07 -0400, Josh Sled wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2007 12:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: 'Twas added to the tree at user request. Given that Java's basically a dead language and only being used for legacy applications now, it's I'm having a hard time trying to figure out

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 07:57 +, Duncan wrote: Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 16 May 2007 13:48:35 -0400: I have no problem waiting for 2007.1, if Gnome and KDE don't mind. I don't know what hackery has to take place to do that, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:48 -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote: No. It would have been ideal if we would have done it with the release. Now, it means people *will* need to use revdep-rebuild as soon as they install their shiny new system if they use binary packages. People coming from stage3

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Rémi Cardona
Chris Gianelloni wrote: It's simple. You mask expat-2.0.0 on all the current profiles, we mark it stable in the snapshot and don't have it masked in the 2007.1 profile. When we release (actually right before), we mark the package stable in the tree. We document the expat upgrade as part of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rémi Cardona wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: It's simple. You mask expat-2.0.0 on all the current profiles, we mark it stable in the snapshot and don't have it masked in the 2007.1 profile. When we release (actually right before), we mark the

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'stricter' FEATURE and poor programming practices notice

2007-05-17 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hans de Graaff wrote: If the notice is only informational, then the emerge process should not be stopped because of it (and this would mean that it is nice to fix these issues but not mandatory). If you disable stricter in FEATURES, you'll still

Re: [gentoo-dev] add built_with_use_die() to eutils.eclass ?

2007-05-17 Thread Petteri Räty
Marius Mauch kirjoitti: On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:45:48 +0200 dju` [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: eerror Your ${package} package has been built without eerror ${func} support, please enable the '${use_flag}' USE flag and eerror re-emerge ${package}. elog You can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:33 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: It's simple. You mask expat-2.0.0 on all the current profiles, we mark it stable in the snapshot and don't have it masked in the 2007.1 profile. When we release (actually right before), we mark the package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:38 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: Now, how can we do this? Could we start changing the profiles right now? (I guess people on ~arch will need to unmask it to not downgrade). That can be avoided if you make an artifical revbump that won't change anything, just have

[gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Le Zhang (r0bertz)

2007-05-17 Thread Duncan
Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 17 May 2007 23:16:59 +0800: Le is joining us from Hong Kong (yes, that's in China boys and girls) where he's currently working for Thizlinux (a Hong Kong based Linux company). I regret to tell you that I have

[gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 17 May 2007 10:59:36 -0700: We're taking a couple months off. We deserve it. There's no way we're making an August release. If you would have checked http://releng.gentoo.org before asking, you wouldn't

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-fps/unreal-tournament-infiltration

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
# Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17 May 2007) # Masked for removal, See bug #169546 for more information. Will be removed on # 17 Jun 2007. games-fps/unreal-tounrament-infiltration If you want to save this mod, rewrite the ebuild to use the zip version. Thanks, -- Chris Gianelloni

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Steve Long
Chris Gianelloni wrote: Now, how can we do this? Could we start changing the profiles right now? Considering we already have a 2.0.0 ebuild, we do the following: - Mask =2.0.0-r9 (this allows for security bumps, if necessary, number can be adjusted) - Copy 2.0.0 to 2.0.0-r9 - When we

[gentoo-dev] Re: 'stricter' FEATURE and poor programming practices notice

2007-05-17 Thread Ryan Hill
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My view is that if this is a QA notice then, if a package doesn't emerge because of it, it is a Gentoo QA bug and package maintainers should be responsible for fixing it. Gentoo should not be applying patches simply to fix what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Le Zhang (r0bertz)

2007-05-17 Thread Zhang Le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 17 May 2007 23:16:59 +0800: Le is joining us from Hong Kong (yes, that's in China boys and girls) where he's currently working for Thizlinux (a Hong

[gentoo-dev] SVN/CVS temporarily down for CIAbot debugging

2007-05-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
CVS and SVN are temporarily offline while I figure out why bug #169930 has come back and broken stuff. I'll send another list message when they are back. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer Council Member E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] docbook-sgml-util build problem

2007-05-17 Thread George Hedfors
Sorry for the post but thanks for the solution. It worked perfectly! George On 5/17/07, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 George Hedfors wrote: Hi list This is my first post and I just joined so I apologize if the question already has been