Luca Barbato wrote:
Enhance distcc?
++
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:12:01 +0200
Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had the 'stricter' FEATURE turned on for some time and found that
many packages failed due to the QA notice regarding poor programming
practices. I filed a few bugs for this but have not gotten a lot of
response,
On Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on some recent findings, it looks like the two above mentioned
features don't work together. pch don't get distributed to distcc
nodes, so they're basically mutually exclusive. However, distcc is a
FEATURE
+# Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 May 2007)
+# Time for the binary ebuild to go as nothing is using it
+# any more. Please use dev-java/sun-javamail instead.
+dev-java/sun-javamail-bin
+
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation
request form the KDE team as well, lately.
welp's been away ;)
welp does not touch KDE packages...
