Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-print/kink

2007-06-22 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
On Thursday, June 21, 2007 08:39:39 PM Wulf C. Krueger wrote: + 21 Jun 2007; Wulf C. Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] package.mask: + Masked net-print/kink for removal wrt bug #176857. net-print/kink is as dead as it gets - no changes in its CVS for more than 3 years. Nothing depends on it and it

Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages

2007-06-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 21 June 2007, Vlastimil Babka wrote: * dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.5.0.5: package has RESTRICT=fetch/(no)mirror! * dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.5.0.5: it may not be legal to redistribute this. this is incorrect ... while USE=bindist has an exact 1-to-1 correlation with the legality of

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: EAPI-1 (or 1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies

2007-06-22 Thread Steve Long
Kent Fredric wrote: Steve Long wrote: Wow that all sounds mega: er what does it mean? ;) I mean, can you give examples of the syntax please? I'm guessing and instead of but what about (..) Is that going to be line-based? (LISP brackets are very annoying imo.) Limitation of symbol oriented

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list

2007-06-22 Thread Thomas Raschbacher (Gentoo)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seemant Kulleen wrote: FWIW, I like this idea a lot. A lot of devs would rather just read the good stuff happening in -dev and discard the other 85%. I vote yes. Thanks, Seemant +1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list

2007-06-22 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 20:02 -0700, Daniel Ostrow wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:09 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Hi all, I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a great description of how

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list

2007-06-22 Thread Wernfried Haas
I think the council discussed/decided something about mailing lists in their last meeting, there doesn't seem to be a log/summary out though. cheers, Wernfried -- Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org forum-mods (at) gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] packages.g.o should link to sources.g.o and vice versa

2007-06-22 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I think it would be good if packages.g.o would link to sources.g.o and vice versa. Interconnecting these sources of information would make them more valuable. I thought it was obvious so I opened

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.g.o should link to sources.g.o and vice versa

2007-06-22 Thread expose
Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2007 17:48 schrieb Marijn Schouten (hkBst): Hi list, I think it would be good if packages.g.o would link to sources.g.o and vice versa. Interconnecting these sources of information would make them more valuable. I thought it was obvious so I opened

[gentoo-dev] last-rites mzscheme

2007-06-22 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Marijn Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14 May 2007) # masked for removal, use =dev-scheme/drscheme-360-r2 # without X use flag instead dev-scheme/mzscheme -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla

[gentoo-dev] Re: packages.g.o should link to sources.g.o and vice versa

2007-06-22 Thread Steve Long
+=10 to both (i get 160 votes on kde bugs.. ;) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list